Literature DB >> 26329484

Comparative Assessment of Cultures from Oral and Urethral Stem Cells for Urethral Regeneration.

Francesca Corradini, Michela Zattoni, Guido Barbagli, Giampaolo Bianchi, Michael Giovanardi, Chiava Serafini, Vicenzo G Genna, Anna Ribbene, Sofia Balò, Francesco Fidanza, Massimo Lazzeri, Michele De Luca, Graziella Pellegrini1.   

Abstract

Urethral reconstruction has received much attention in recent years, due to pathologies such as recurrence of urethral strictures after treatments. Various surgical techniques have been developed to obtain the best risk-benefit ratio, such as autologous grafts taken from the oral cavity. Tissue engineering and stem cells, growing in a tissue from a small biopsies, can further improve surgery, reducing invasiveness and morbidity. To determine whether urethra or other epithelia can be equally useful for urethra engineering, a comparison of clonogenic ability, proliferative potential and stem cell markers should be obtained. In this study, 19 biopsies from urethra, and 21 from oral mucosa were obtained from patients, during reconstructive surgery. Urethral and oral tissues were removed from the same donor, to develop primary cultures and cell characterization. The long term regenerative properties of both tissues were investigated in vitro by life span, clonal analysis and markers of different clonal types. Results revealed the same high proliferative potential for urethra and oral mucosa cultures, but maintenance of specific markers. Karyotype and growth factor dependence confirmed the normal phenotype of cultured cells. Clonal analysis of the proliferative compartment highlighted a very different proportion of stem and transient amplifying cells, characterised by dissimilar cell size profile and marker expression. In conclusion, both tissues can be cultured and preserve their stem cells in vitro. Few differences appeared in oral mucosa vs urethra, suggesting that they can be equally useful for tissue engineering of the urethral tract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26329484     DOI: 10.2174/1574888x10666150902094644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Res Ther        ISSN: 1574-888X            Impact factor:   3.828


  5 in total

Review 1.  The Growing Medical Need for Tracheal Replacement: Reconstructive Strategies Should Overcome Their Limits.

Authors:  Davide Adamo; Giulia Galaverni; Vincenzo Giuseppe Genna; Filippo Lococo; Graziella Pellegrini
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-09

Review 2.  Regenerative and engineered options for urethroplasty.

Authors:  Filippo Pederzoli; Gregory Joice; Andrea Salonia; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Nikolai A Sopko
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Current Status of Tissue Engineering in the Management of Severe Hypospadias.

Authors:  Tariq O Abbas; Elsadig Mahdi; Anwarul Hasan; Abdulla AlAnsari; Cristian Pablo Pennisi
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 4.  Regenerative Medicine of Epithelia: Lessons From the Past and Future Goals.

Authors:  Eleonora Maurizi; Davide Adamo; Federica Maria Magrelli; Giulia Galaverni; Eustachio Attico; Alessia Merra; Maria Benedetta Rizzarda Maffezzoni; Lorena Losi; Vincenzo Giuseppe Genna; Virginia Sceberras; Graziella Pellegrini
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-03-25

Review 5.  Urothelial or oral mucosa cells for tissue-engineered urethroplasty: A critical revision of the clinical outcome.

Authors:  Guido Barbagli; Axel Heidenreich; Vahudin Zugor; Leonidas Karapanos; Massimo Lazzeri
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2019-04-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.