Literature DB >> 26329333

Ultrasound as an Outcome Measure in Gout. A Validation Process by the OMERACT Ultrasound Working Group.

Lene Terslev, Marwin Gutierrez, Wolfgang A Schmidt, Helen I Keen, Emilio Filippucci, David Kane, Ralf Thiele, Gurjit Kaeley, Peter Balint, Peter Mandl, Andrea Delle Sedie, Hilde Berner Hammer, Robin Christensen, Ingrid Möller, Carlos Pineda, Eugene Kissin, George A Bruyn, Annamaria Iagnocco, Esperanza Naredo, Maria Antonietta D'Agostino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the work performed by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Ultrasound (US) Working Group on the validation of US as a potential outcome measure in gout.
METHODS: Based on the lack of definitions, highlighted in a recent literature review on US as an outcome tool in gout, a series of iterative exercises were carried out to obtain consensus-based definitions on US elementary components in gout using a Delphi exercise and subsequently testing these definitions in static images and in patients with proven gout. Cohen's κ was used to test agreement, and values of 0-0.20 were considered poor, 0.20-0.40 fair, 0.40-0.60 moderate, 0.60-0.80 good, and 0.80-1 excellent.
RESULTS: With an agreement of > 80%, consensus-based definitions were obtained for the 4 elementary lesions highlighted in the literature review: tophi, aggregates, erosions, and double contour (DC). In static images interobserver reliability ranged from moderate to almost perfect, and similar results were found for the intrareader reliability. In patients the intraobserver agreement was good for all lesions except DC (moderate). The interobserver agreement was poor for aggregates and DC but moderate for the other components.
CONCLUSION: These first steps in evaluating the validity of US as an outcome measure for gout show that the reliability of the definitions ranged from moderate to excellent in static images and somewhat lower in patients, indicating that a standardized scanning technique may be needed, before testing the responsiveness of those definitions in a composite US score.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GOUT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ULTRASOUND

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26329333     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.141294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  13 in total

1.  How is the ultrasound in rheumatology used, implemented, and applied in Latin American centers? Results from a multicenter study.

Authors:  Marwin Gutierrez; Cristina Hernandez-Diaz; Lucio Ventura-Rios; Lina María Saldarriaga-Rivera; Santiago Ruta; Magaly Alva; Claudia Mora -Trujillo; Wilkerson Pérez; Henry Terrazas; Rodolfo Del Carmen Arape Toyo; Maritza Quintero; Carla Solano; Oscar Sedano Santiago; Janet Grisel Huamán Sotomayor; Cesar Cefferino; Guillermo E Py; Marcelo J Audisio; Walter Javier Spindler; Horacio Berman; Carla Airoldi; Rómulo Wong; Ana Laura Álvarez Del Castillo Araujo; Mario E Díaz; Carmen Cerón Villaquiran; Rubén Darío Mantilla; José Alexandre Mendonça; Inês Guimarães da Silveira; Aline Defaveri do Prado; Melissa Cláudia Bisi; Violeta Rosario; Jeannette Medrano-Sánchez; Roberto Muñoz-Louis; Ana Cecilia Lozada-Navarro; Araceli Bernal; Maribel Lozano; Carlos Pineda
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Performance of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Gout in a Multicenter Study: Comparison With Monosodium Urate Monohydrate Crystal Analysis as the Gold Standard.

Authors:  Alexis Ogdie; William J Taylor; Tuhina Neogi; Jaap Fransen; Tim L Jansen; H Ralph Schumacher; Worawit Louthrenoo; Janitzia Vazquez-Mellado; Maxim Eliseev; Geraldine McCarthy; Lisa K Stamp; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Francisca Sivera; Hang-Korng Ea; Martijn Gerritsen; Giovanni Cagnotto; Lorenzo Cavagna; Chingtsai Lin; Yin-Yi Chou; Anne-Kathrin Tausche; Manuella Lima Gomes Ochtrop; Matthijs Janssen; Jiunn-Horng Chen; Ole Slot; Juris Lazovskis; Douglas White; Marco A Cimmino; Till Uhlig; Nicola Dalbeth
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 10.995

3.  Potential risk factors for reactive arthritis and persistence of symptoms at 2 years: a case-control study with longitudinal follow-up.

Authors:  Helga Raquel Garcia Ferrer; Alexander Azan; Isa Iraheta; Joan Von Feldt; Luis R Espinoza; Julia Manasson; Jose U Scher; Abraham Garcia Kutzbach; Alexis Ogdie
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Tendon involvement in patients with gout: an ultrasound study of prevalence.

Authors:  Lucio Ventura-Ríos; Guadalupe Sánchez-Bringas; Carlos Pineda; Cristina Hernández-Díaz; Anthony Reginato; Magaly Alva; Marcelo Audisio; Ana Bertoli; Tomas Cazenave; Marwin Gutiérrez; Claudia Mora; Guillermo Py; Oscar Sedano; Carla Solano; Eugenio de Miguel
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Size matters: observations regarding the sonographic double contour sign in different joint sizes in acute gouty arthritis.

Authors:  C Löffler; H Sattler; U Löffler; B K Krämer; R Bergner
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Ultrasound scans and dual energy CT identify tendons as preferred anatomical location of MSU crystal depositions in gouty joints.

Authors:  Yuan Yuan; Chang Liu; Xi Xiang; Tong-Ling Yuan; Li Qiu; Yi Liu; Yu-Bin Luo; Y Zhao; Martin Herrmann
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 7.  Role of dual-energy CT in the diagnosis and follow-up of gout: systematic analysis of the literature.

Authors:  André Ramon; Amélie Bohm-Sigrand; Pierre Pottecher; Pascal Richette; Jean-Francis Maillefert; Herve Devilliers; Paul Ornetti
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Ultrasonography and dual-energy computed tomography provide different quantification of urate burden in gout: results from a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tristan Pascart; Agathe Grandjean; Laurène Norberciak; Vincent Ducoulombier; Marguerite Motte; Hélène Luraschi; Marie Vandecandelaere; Catherine Godart; Eric Houvenagel; Nasser Namane; Jean-François Budzik
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.156

9.  An optimal ultrasonographic diagnostic test for early gout: A prospective controlled study.

Authors:  Eleonora Norkuviene; Mykolas Petraitis; Indre Apanaviciene; Dalia Virviciute; Asta Baranauskaite
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 10.  The diagnostic performance of musculoskeletal ultrasound in gout: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qingyu Zhang; Fuqiang Gao; Wei Sun; Jinhui Ma; Liming Cheng; Zirong Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.