Literature DB >> 26329141

A post-remediation assessment in Jersey City of the association of hexavalent chromium in house dust and urinary chromium in children.

Kathleen Black1, Michael Gochfeld1, Paul J Lioy1, Zhi-Hua Tina Fan2, Chang Ho Yu1, Chris Jeitner3, Marta Hernandez1, Stephanie A Einstein1, Alan H Stern4,5.   

Abstract

Although all chromite ore processing residue (COPR) sites near residential neighborhoods in Jersey City, New Jersey have undergone remediation, recent studies found widespread, but low levels of hexavalent chromium (Cr(+6)) in house dust both in Jersey City and in communities with no known sources of Cr(+6). This study was designed as a follow-up to determine whether there is an association between current Cr(+6) levels in house dust and urinary chromium concentrations in young children. Dust samples (N=369) were collected from 123 homes. The median Cr(+6) concentration was 3.3 μg/g (mean±SD 5.2±7.5) and the median Cr(+6) loading was 1.1 μg/m(2) (1.9±3.1). These levels were not elevated compared with previously reported levels in background communities (median concentration=3.5 μg/g; median loading=2.8 μg/m(2)). Urinary chromium concentrations were measured in spot urine samples collected from 150 children, ages 3 months to 6 years. The median uncorrected urinary chromium concentration was 0.19 μg/l (0.22±0.16). Current urinary chromium concentrations were significantly lower than those previously reported before and during remediation (t-test; P<0.001). Urinary chromium concentrations were not significantly higher in homes with high (75th or 90th percentile) Cr(+6) dust levels (concentration or loading) compared with other homes. Multiple linear regression was used to examine the relationship between Cr(+6) levels (concentration and loading) in house dust and urinary chromium concentrations (uncorrected and specific gravity corrected). Contrary to pre-remediation studies, we did not find a positive association between Cr(+6) levels in house dust and urinary chromium concentrations. The findings indicate that current Cr(+6) levels in house dust are not positively associated with children's chromium exposure as measured by urinary chromium, and the children's exposure to Cr(+6) in house dust is below the level that could be identified by urine sampling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26329141     DOI: 10.1038/jes.2015.50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  17 in total

Review 1.  More than obvious: better methods for interpreting nondetect data.

Authors:  Dennis R Helsel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Fabricating data: how substituting values for nondetects can ruin results, and what can be done about it.

Authors:  Dennis R Helsel
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Reduction in residential chromium following site remediation.

Authors:  N C Freeman; P J Lioy; A H Stern
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.235

4.  Exposure to chromium dust from homes in a Chromium Surveillance Project.

Authors:  N C Freeman; A H Stern; P J Lioy
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1997 May-Jun

5.  Hexavalent chromium in house dust--a comparison between an area with historic contamination from chromate production and background locations.

Authors:  Alan H Stern; Chang Ho Yu; Kathleen Black; Lin Lin; Paul J Lioy; Michael Gochfeld; Zhi-Hua Tina Fan
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 6.  Risk assessment of the allergic dermatitis potential of environmental exposure to hexavalent chromium.

Authors:  A H Stern; R E Bagdon; R E Hazen; F N Marzulli
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1993-12

7.  Residential exposure to chromium waste--urine biological monitoring in conjunction with environmental exposure monitoring.

Authors:  A H Stern; N C Freeman; P Pleban; R R Boesch; T Wainman; T Howell; S I Shupack; B B Johnson; P J Lioy
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of sodium dichromate dihydrate (Cas No. 7789-12-0) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice (drinking water studies).

Authors: 
Journal:  Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser       Date:  2008-07

9.  Microenvironmental analysis of residential exposure to chromium-laden wastes in and around New Jersey homes.

Authors:  P J Lioy; N C Freeman; T Wainman; A H Stern; R Boesch; T Howell; S I Shupack
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.000

10.  Chromite ore processing residue in Hudson County, New Jersey.

Authors:  T Burke; J Fagliano; M Goldoft; R E Hazen; R Iglewicz; T McKee
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.