OBJECTIVE: This research investigates a novel method for identifying and measuring school-aged children with poor auditory processing through a tablet computer. DESIGN: Feasibility and test-retest reliability are investigated by examining the percentage of Group 1 participants able to complete the tasks and developmental effects on performance. Concurrent validity was investigated against traditional tests of auditory processing using Group 2. STUDY SAMPLE: There were 847 students aged 5 to 13 years in group 1, and 46 aged 5 to 14 years in group 2. RESULTS: Some tasks could not be completed by the youngest participants. Significant correlations were found between results of most auditory processing areas assessed by the Feather Squadron test and traditional auditory processing tests. Test-retest comparisons indicated good reliability for most of the Feather Squadron assessments and some of the traditional tests. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate the Feather Squadron assessment is a time-efficient, feasible, concurrently valid, and reliable approach for measuring auditory processing in school-aged children. Clinically, this may be a useful option for audiologists when performing auditory processing assessments as it is a relatively fast, engaging, and easy way to assess auditory processing abilities. Research is needed to investigate further the construct validity of this new assessment by examining the association between performance on Feather Squadron and objective evoked potential, lesion studies, and/or functional imaging measures of auditory function.
OBJECTIVE: This research investigates a novel method for identifying and measuring school-aged children with poor auditory processing through a tablet computer. DESIGN: Feasibility and test-retest reliability are investigated by examining the percentage of Group 1 participants able to complete the tasks and developmental effects on performance. Concurrent validity was investigated against traditional tests of auditory processing using Group 2. STUDY SAMPLE: There were 847 students aged 5 to 13 years in group 1, and 46 aged 5 to 14 years in group 2. RESULTS: Some tasks could not be completed by the youngest participants. Significant correlations were found between results of most auditory processing areas assessed by the Feather Squadron test and traditional auditory processing tests. Test-retest comparisons indicated good reliability for most of the Feather Squadron assessments and some of the traditional tests. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate the Feather Squadron assessment is a time-efficient, feasible, concurrently valid, and reliable approach for measuring auditory processing in school-aged children. Clinically, this may be a useful option for audiologists when performing auditory processing assessments as it is a relatively fast, engaging, and easy way to assess auditory processing abilities. Research is needed to investigate further the construct validity of this new assessment by examining the association between performance on Feather Squadron and objective evoked potential, lesion studies, and/or functional imaging measures of auditory function.
Authors: Nádia Giulian de Carvalho; Maria Isabel Ramos do Amaral; Maria Francisca Colella-Santos Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-08-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jordana C Soares; Sangamanatha A Veeranna; Vijay Parsa; Chris Allan; Winnie Ly; Minh Duong; Paula Folkeard; Sheila Moodie; Prudence Allen Journal: Audiol Res Date: 2021-12-13