Wenzhong Liu1, Ji Yi1, Siyu Chen1, Shuliang Jiao2, Hao F Zhang3. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, Florida 33174. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208 and Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Doppler optical coherence tomography (OCT) is widely used for measuring retinal blood flow. Existing Doppler OCT methods require the eyeball axial length, in which empirical values are usually used. However, variations in the axial length can create a bias unaccounted for in the retinal blood flow measurement. The authors plan to develop a Doppler OCT method that can measure the total retinal blood flow rate without requiring the eyeball axial length. METHODS: The authors measured the retinal blood flow rate using a dual-ring scanning protocol. The small and large scanning rings entered the eye at different incident angles (small ring: 4°; large ring: 6°), focused on different locations on the retina, and detected the projected velocities/phase shifts along the probing beams. The authors calculated the ratio of the projected velocities between the two rings, and then used this ratio to estimate absolute flow velocity. The authors tested this method in both Intralipid phantoms and in vivo rats. RESULTS: In the Intralipid flow phantom experiments, the preset and measured flow rates were consistent with the coefficient of determination as 0.97. Linear fitting between preset and measured flow rates determined the fitting slope as 1.07 and the intercept as -0.28. In in vivo rat experiments, the measured average total retinal blood flow was 7.02 ± 0.31 μl/min among four wild-type rats. The authors' measured flow rates were consistent with results in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: By using a dual-ring scanning protocol with carefully controlled incident angle difference between the two scanning rings in Doppler OCT, the authors demonstrated that it is feasible to measure the absolute retinal blood flow without knowing the eyeball axial length.
PURPOSE: Doppler optical coherence tomography (OCT) is widely used for measuring retinal blood flow. Existing Doppler OCT methods require the eyeball axial length, in which empirical values are usually used. However, variations in the axial length can create a bias unaccounted for in the retinal blood flow measurement. The authors plan to develop a Doppler OCT method that can measure the total retinal blood flow rate without requiring the eyeball axial length. METHODS: The authors measured the retinal blood flow rate using a dual-ring scanning protocol. The small and large scanning rings entered the eye at different incident angles (small ring: 4°; large ring: 6°), focused on different locations on the retina, and detected the projected velocities/phase shifts along the probing beams. The authors calculated the ratio of the projected velocities between the two rings, and then used this ratio to estimate absolute flow velocity. The authors tested this method in both Intralipid phantoms and in vivo rats. RESULTS: In the Intralipid flow phantom experiments, the preset and measured flow rates were consistent with the coefficient of determination as 0.97. Linear fitting between preset and measured flow rates determined the fitting slope as 1.07 and the intercept as -0.28. In in vivo rat experiments, the measured average total retinal blood flow was 7.02 ± 0.31 μl/min among four wild-type rats. The authors' measured flow rates were consistent with results in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: By using a dual-ring scanning protocol with carefully controlled incident angle difference between the two scanning rings in Doppler OCT, the authors demonstrated that it is feasible to measure the absolute retinal blood flow without knowing the eyeball axial length.
Authors: C P Avila; D U Bartsch; D G Bitner; L Cheng; A J Mueller; M P Karavellas; W R Freeman Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: David A Atchison; Catherine E Jones; Katrina L Schmid; Nicola Pritchard; James M Pope; Wendy E Strugnell; Robyn A Riley Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Thomas W Gardner; David A Antonetti; Alistair J Barber; Kathryn F LaNoue; Steven W Levison Journal: Surv Ophthalmol Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 6.048
Authors: Bernhard Baumann; Benjamin Potsaid; Martin F Kraus; Jonathan J Liu; David Huang; Joachim Hornegger; Alex E Cable; Jay S Duker; James G Fujimoto Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2011-05-13 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Weiye Song; Sipei Fu; Shangshang Song; Sui Zhang; Lei Zhang; Steven Ness; Manishi Desai; Ji Yi Journal: Neurophotonics Date: 2019-07-09 Impact factor: 3.593
Authors: Wenzhong Liu; Shoujian Wang; Brian Soetikno; Ji Yi; Kevin Zhang; Siyu Chen; Robert A Linsenmeier; Christine M Sorenson; Nader Sheibani; Hao F Zhang Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Michelle R Tamplin; Kimberly A Broadhurst; Anthony H Vitale; Ryuya Hashimoto; Randy H Kardon; Isabella M Grumbach Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 3.283