Federica Facchin1, Giussy Barbara2, Emanuela Saita1, Paola Mosconi3, Anna Roberto3, Luigi Fedele2, Paolo Vercellini2. 1. a Department of Psychology , Catholic University of Milan , Milan , Italy . 2. b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico and Università degli Studi di Milano , Milano , Italy , and. 3. c Department of Public Health , IRCCS - Istituto Mario Negri , Milano , Italy.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: No prior study of endometriosis has investigated the psychological impact of having asymptomatic endometriosis versus endometriosis with pelvic pain in a systematic way. This study aimed at examining the impact of endometriosis on quality of life, anxiety and depression by comparing asymptomatic endometriosis, endometriosis with pelvic pain, and healthy, pain-free controls. The psychological impact of different types of endometriosis pain was also tested. METHODS: One hundred and ten patients with surgically diagnosed endometriosis (78 with pelvic pain and 32 without pain symptoms) and 61 healthy controls completed two psychometric tests assessing quality of life, anxiety and depression. Endometriosis participants indicated on a numerical rating scale the intensity of four types of pain (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain and dyschezia). RESULTS: Endometriosis patients with pelvic pain had poorer quality of life and mental health as compared with those with asymptomatic endometriosis and the healthy controls. No significant differences were found between asymptomatic endometriosis and the control group. Dysmenorrhea had significant effects only on physical quality of life; non-menstrual pelvic pain affected all the variables; no significant effects were found for dyspareunia and dyschezia. CONCLUSIONS: Pain significantly affects women's experience of endometriosis. The medical treatment of endometriosis with pain may not be sufficient and psychological intervention is recommended.
INTRODUCTION: No prior study of endometriosis has investigated the psychological impact of having asymptomatic endometriosis versus endometriosis with pelvic pain in a systematic way. This study aimed at examining the impact of endometriosis on quality of life, anxiety and depression by comparing asymptomatic endometriosis, endometriosis with pelvic pain, and healthy, pain-free controls. The psychological impact of different types of endometriosis pain was also tested. METHODS: One hundred and ten patients with surgically diagnosed endometriosis (78 with pelvic pain and 32 without pain symptoms) and 61 healthy controls completed two psychometric tests assessing quality of life, anxiety and depression. Endometriosisparticipants indicated on a numerical rating scale the intensity of four types of pain (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain and dyschezia). RESULTS:Endometriosispatients with pelvic pain had poorer quality of life and mental health as compared with those with asymptomatic endometriosis and the healthy controls. No significant differences were found between asymptomatic endometriosis and the control group. Dysmenorrhea had significant effects only on physical quality of life; non-menstrual pelvic pain affected all the variables; no significant effects were found for dyspareunia and dyschezia. CONCLUSIONS:Pain significantly affects women's experience of endometriosis. The medical treatment of endometriosis with pain may not be sufficient and psychological intervention is recommended.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anxiety; depression; endometriosis; pelvic pain; quality of life
Authors: Kemi M Doll; Annie Green Howard; Till Stürmer; Tim Carey; Wanda K Nicholson; Erin Carey; Evan Myers; David Nerenz; Whitney R Robinson Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2021-11-06 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Valentina Rossi; Roberta Galizia; Francesca Tripodi; Chiara Simonelli; Maria Grazia Porpora; Filippo Maria Nimbi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Insa Winzenborg; Ahmed Nader; Akshanth R Polepally; Mohan Liu; Jacob Degner; Cheri E Klein; Nael M Mostafa; Peter Noertersheuser; Juki Ng Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Kedra Wallace; Elizabeth A Stewart; Lauren A Wise; Wanda Kay Nicholson; John Preston Parry; Shuaiqi Zhang; Shannon Laughlin-Tommaso; Vanessa Jacoby; Raymond M Anchan; Michael P Diamond; Sateria Venable; Amber Shiflett; Ganesa R Wegienka; George Larry Maxwell; Daniel Wojdyla; Evan R Myers; Erica Marsh Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Mauricio S Abrao; Eric Surrey; Keith Gordon; Michael C Snabes; Hui Wang; Horia Ijacu; Hugh S Taylor Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 2.809