Molecular characterization of selected multidrug resistant Pseudomonas from water distribution systems in southwestern Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: Persistence of antibiotic resistant bacteria, including multidrug resistant (MDR) pseudomonads, is an important environmental health problem associated with drinking water distribution systems (DWDS) worldwide. There is paucity of data on the molecular characteristics of antibiotic resistance genes and their mode of transfer among pseudomonads from DWDS located in resource-challenged areas such as southwestern Nigeria.
METHODS: MDR pseudomonads (n = 22) were selected from a panel of 296 different strains that were isolated from treated and untreated water in six DWDS located across southwest Nigeria. Primarily, the isolated pseudomonads strains were identified by 16S rDNA sequencing and antibiotic-resistance testing was completed using agar breakpoints assays. The final panel of strains of resistant to more than three classes of antibiotics (i.e. MDR), were further characterized by PCR genotyping, Sanger sequencing, and plasmid profiling.
RESULTS: Pseudomonad resistance to gentamicin and streptomycin ranged from 22.7 to 54.6 % while resistance to tetracycline, ceftiofur and sulphamethoxazole ranged from 40.9 to 77.3 %. The most commonly detected antibiotic resistance genes were tet(A) (31.8 % of isolates), sul1 (31.8 %), bla TEM (40.9 %) and aph(3″) (c) (36.4 %). Class 1 integron sequences were evident in 27.3 % of isolates and they harbored genes encoding resistance to aminoglycosides (aadA2, aadA1), trimethoprim (dfrA15, dfr7) and sulphonamide (sul1) while the plasmid ranged between 22 and 130 kb.
CONCLUSIONS: Pseudomonas spp, isolated from these DWDS possess resistance genes and factors that are of public and environmental health significance. Therefore, has the potential of contributing to the global scourge of resistance genes transfer in human, animals and environments, thereby, useful in the epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance.

Background

Pseudomonas spp, is a ubiquitous and diverse genus of Gram-negative bacteria that can be found in soil, water, decaying vegetation and animals. According to Craun et al. [1], Pseudomonas was one of the most frequently identified agents associated with waterborne outbreaks of dermatitis (rash or folliculitis), as well as conjunctivitis, otitis externa and other symptoms from recreational water in the US Pseudomonads are well adapted to survival in the warm temperatures found in whirlpools, hot tubs and indoor pools.

The most important and ubiquitous pathogenic pseudomonad is P. aeruginosa. It is medically significant and has a high intrinsic resistance to antibiotics while causing wide spectrum of opportunistic infections [2]. P. aeruginosa is best known for chronic lung infections among cystic fibrosis patients [3]. P. aeruginosa is also a cause of serious infections among immunocompromised cancer patients, burn patients, catheterized patients, and other hospitalized individuals [2].

Antibiotic resistance genes can be transferred between different microorganisms [4]. Mobile genetic elements such as plasmids, transposons and integrons contribute to P. aeruginosa multidrug resistance [5-8]. There is, however, a paucity of information about the molecular basis for antibiotic resistance for environmental Pseudomonas in southwestern Nigeria. Hence, we characterized selected multidrug resistant bacteria from water distribution systems from southwestern Nigeria using 16S rDNA sequencing and PCR genotyping.

Methods

Bacterial isolates

Independent multidrug resistant Pseudomonas isolates (n = 22) were selected between December 2010 and July 2011 from a pool of two hundred and ninety-one different bacteria genera from raw, treated and municipal taps of six selected water distribution systems in Ife, Ede, Asejire, Eleyele, Owena-Ondo and Owena-Idanre, in southwestern Nigeria. Methods for sampling and bacterial isolation were described previously [10]. Isolates were stored in freezing medium at −80 °C in 96-well plates until analysis.

Description of sample locations

The description of these dams’ water distribution systems selected for this study is in our previous publications [9-11]. However, for clarity of this paper, raw water samples were taken from the untreated water from the dam at the point of entering the water treatment plants before passing through the plant. Treated water samples were taken from the final water after passing through all purification stages from the treatment plants before pumping to the municipal taps for public consumption while samples from the municipal taps were taking from the taps at the point of public consumption.

Extraction of DNA and molecular characterization of bacteria using 16S rDNA

The stock culture was streaked on Luria Betani (LB) agar and grown overnight. Afterwards, total genomic DNA was extracted by dispensing 200 µl of 5 % chelex in a tube. A loopful of the overnight grown colony of bacterium from LB agar was then inoculated into the solution. The mixture was then boiled at 100 °C for 10 min and centrifuge at 13 k×g for 1 min. Five microliter of the supernatant which consist of the extracted DNA was then used as template with 2 mM MgCl2, 0.8 mM dNTPs, 0.2 µl of primer 1 and primer 2 and 1× PCR buffer. The reaction condition include 1 min denaturation (95 °C) followed by 30 cycles of 96 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s and a final extension of 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were then separated and visualized on 1 % agarose gel electrophoresis to confirm amplification. The 16S rDNA sequence was amplified using 16s-8F (AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG) and 16s-517 (ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG) primers. PCR products were sequenced (Eurofins MWG, USA) and manual base calls and sequence trimming was completed by sequencer (5.0) BLAST [12] was used to identify close sequence matches (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nib.gov/BLAST/blast).

Phylogenetic tree construction

Phylogenetic relatedness of the 16s rDNA genes of these Pseudomonas was compared with 12 downloaded 16s rDNA sequences of other species from the gene bank. Sequences were aligned by multiple sequence alignment technique using CLUSTAL W [13] and a phylogenetic tree constructed by the neighbor joining method [14] using MEGA version 5 [15]. Azotobacterchroococcum (JQ692178)’s 16s rDNA was used as an outgroup.

Antimicrobial drug susceptibility and selection of multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas spp

Multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas was selected based on their resistance to over three classes of antibiotics. This was carried out after assessing antibiotic resistant properties of the Pseudomonas using break point assays on LB agar plates [9]. This involves autoclaving of LB agar and cooling down to 45 °C in a water bath and seeding with antibiotics of specific concentration (Table 1) based on Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standard for gram negative bacteria [16]. Afterwards, the medium was then poured into Petri dishes (150 × 15 mm) and allowed to set. Overnight culture were then stabbed from 96-well plate onto agar plate using 96-well pin replicator and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Isolates were scored as ‘1’ for growth and ‘0’ for no growth on each antibiotics plate. It should be noted that E. coli strain K12 was used as negative control while E. coli strain H5N was used as positive control.

Table 1

Antibiotic concentrations tested against Pseudomonas spp

Code	Name	Concentration (µg/ml)
FF	Florfenicol	16
T	Tetracycline	16
S	Streptomycin	16
G	Gentamycin	16
K	Kanamycin	64
C	Chloramphenicol	32
N	Nalidixic acid	30
AMC	Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid	32/16
CEF	Ceftiofur	12
SU	Sulfamethoxazole	512
SXT	Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim	76/4

Assessing antibiotic resistance genes

In this study, six tetracycline, three sulfonamide, three extended β-lactamase and three streptomycin/spectinomycin resistance genes were amplified using specific primer specific for each gene and the annealing temperature as described in Table 2. The amplification of all the genes was carried out using 5 µl of the chelex extracted DNA as template for the PCR mixture with 5 µl of PCR buffer (1×), 2 µl of MgCl2 (2 mM), 1 µl of dNTPs 0.8 mM and 1 µl (0.2 µl) each of the forward and reverse primers in a thermo cycler (Model: Bio Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA, USA). The condition for the amplification of the genes include: 1 min of denaturation of 95 °C followed by 30 cycles of 96 °C for 30 s 60 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s and final extension of 72 °C for 10 min. All these conditions remain the same during the amplification of the genes except the annealing temperature which is described in Table 2. PCR products were then separated and visualized on 1 % agarose gel electrophoresis to confirm amplification.

Table 2

Primers used in this study for amplification of class 1 and class 2 integrons and other antibiotic resistant genes

Primer pair	Target	Sequence (5´–3´)	Annealing temperature (◦C)	Amplicon size (bp)	References
Primer 1 16s-8F	16S rDNA	AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG	60	456	[36]
Primer 2 16s-517	16S rDNA	ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG	60	456	[37]
IntI1_F	Class 1 integrase gene	CCTCCCGCACGATGATC	55	270	[38]
IntI1_R		TCCACGCATCGTCAGGC
IntI2_F	Class 2 integrase gene	TTATTGCTGGGATTAGGC	50	233	[39]
IntI2_R		ACGGCTACCCTCTGTTATC
5′_CS	Class 1 integron variable region	GGCATCCAAGCAGCAAG	58.5	Variable	[40]
3′_CS		AAGCAGACTTGACCTGA
Hep_F	Class 2 integron variable region	CGGGATCCCGGACGGCATGCACGATTTGTA	60	Variable	[41]
Hep_R		GATGCCATCGCAAGTACGAG
Sul1-F	sul1	CGGCGTGGGCTACCTGAACG	60	433	[42]
Sul1-R		GCCGATCGCGTGAAGTTCCG
Sul2-F	sul2	GCGCTCAAGGCAGATGGCATT	60	293	[42]
Sul2-R		GCGTTTGATACCGGCACCCGT
pVP440sul3F	sul3	TCAAAGCAAAATGATATGAGC	55	787	[42]
pVP440sul3R		TTTCAAGGCATCTGATAAAGAC
qacEΔ1F	qacEΔ1F	ATC GCA ATA GTT GGC GAA GT	58	800	[43]
sul1-B	sul1-B	GCA AGG CGG AAA CCC GCG CC	58		[44]
aph (3″)c-F	aph (3″)c	GCTCAAAGGTCGAGGTGTGG	55	515	[27]
aph (3″)c-R		CCAGTTCTCTTCGGCGTTAG	55	515	[27]
ant (3″)b-F	ant (3″)b	CAGCGCAATGACATTCTTGC	55	295	[27]
ant (3″)b-F		GTCGGCAGCGACA(C/T)CCTTCG	55	295	[27]
aph(6)-1dd-F	aph(6)-1dd	GACTCCTGCAATCGTCAAGG	55	560	[27]
aph(6)-1dd-R		GCAATGCGTCTAGGATCGAG	55	560	[27]
tet(A)-F	tet(A)	TTGGCATTCTGCATTCACTC	60	494	[45]
tet(A)-R		GTATAGCTTGCCGGAAGTCG	60	494	[45]
tet(B)-F	tet(B)	CAGTGCTGTTGTTGTCATTAA	60	571	[45]
tet(B)-R		GCTTGGAATACTGAGTGTAA	60	571	[45]
tet(E)-F	tet(E)	TATTAACGGGCTGGCATTTC	55	544	[45]
tet(E)-R		AGCTGTCAGGTGGGTCAAAC	55	544	[45]
tet(M)-F		ACACGCCAGGACATATGGAT	55	536	[45]
tet(M)-R	tet(M)	ATTTCCGCAAAGTTCAGACG	55	536	[45]
tet(30)-F	tet(30)	CCGTCATGCAATTTGTGTTC	55	550	[45]
tet(30)-R		TAGAGCACCCAGATCGTTCC	55	550	[45]
SHV_F	bla SHV	GCGAAAGCCAGCTGTCGGGC	62	538	[46]
SHV_R		GATTGGCGGCGCTGTTATCGC	62	538	[46]
CTX_F	bla CTX-M	GTGCAGTACCAGTAAAGTTATGG	55	538	[46]
CTX_R		CGCAATATCATTGGTGGTGCC		538	[46]
TEM_F	bla TEM	AAAGATGCTGAAGATCA	44	425	[46]
TEM_R		TTTGGTATGGCTTCATTC		425	[46]

Assessing class 1 and 2 integrons

The integrase genes of class 1 and class 2 were amplified by the use of PCR using 5 µl of DNA template extracted by chelex method described above as template. Primer specific for the integrase gene and variable region was selected as described on Table 2. Condition for the PCR was also as described above except for the annealing temperature which was as described on Table 2. It should be noted that after amplification of gene cassette of both Class 1 and Class 2 integrons using 5′-CS/3′-CS and hep_F/hep_R, respectively. PCR products of the amplified genes were used for sequencing (Eurofins MWG, USA). The putative gene cassettes harboured on the integrase sequences were determined through online similarity searches using the BLAST software in the National Center for Biotechnology Information website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).

Determination of presence of plasmid on bacteria isolates

Bacteria (Pseudomonas isolates) were grown on Luria–Bertani (LB) agar overnight and a single colony was picked and inoculated overnight as well in LB Broth. One hundred and fifty microliter of the culture was later pelleted from the culture by centrifugation for 10 min at 1000×g. The supernatant was removed and re-suspended in 100 µl of lysis buffer (3 % SDS, 50 mM Tris pH 12.6 with 50 mM Tris adjusted by 1.6 ml 2 N NaOH up to 100 ml final volume). The mixture was incubated at 55 °C for 1 h. The resulting plasmid was extracted with 150 µl of phenol:chloroform (1:1, v/v, pH 7.9) and mixed by inversion several times before spinning at highest speed for 10 min. Fifty microliter of the supernatant was transferred into a new tube and mixed with 10 µl of 10× loading dye (Invitrogen). The mixture containing the plasmid was run on 1 % agarose gel electrophoresis in 1× TAE (tris-acetate buffer).

Results

Bacteria isolates

In this study, 22 MDR Pseudomonas were identified by 16S rDNA out of a total of 296 different strains that were isolated from all sampled water as P. putida, P.fluorescens and P.otitidis (Table 3). Phylogenetic studies showed 10 of the Pseudomonads to be in single distinct cluster with P. graminis (KC790241.1) from leaf of Wasabia japonica from China, P. putida (JQ968690.1) from activated sludge in China, Pseudomonas spp (AB302400.1) from Japan and uncultured bacterium (HQ121069.1) from USA. Others such as Pseudomonas spp (JF683300) and Pseudomonas spp (FM161425.1) from Ede municipal tap and Asejire treated water, respectively belong to the same cluster (Fig. 1).

Table 3

Phenotypes, antibiotics resistance gene and integrons among MDR Pseudomonas spp

Source	Strain ID	Bacteria	Phenotype	tet(A)	tet (B)	tet (E)	tet(M)	tet (30)	Sul 1	Sul 2	blaSHV	blaCTX	blaTEM	aph (3″)c	ant (3″)b	aph (6)1d d	int 1	v 1	int 2	v 2
IRW	96b	P. putida	FF, T, CEF, SU, AMC	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−
IFW	89	P. putida	T, S, G, K, C, SXT, AMC, SU	+	−	−	−	+	−	−	+	−	+	+	+	−	−	−	−	−
EDRW	299A	P. otitidis	FF, C, SXT, AMC, SU	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−
EDRW	99A	P. putida	FF, SXT, AMC	−	−	−	−	−	−	+	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−
EDRW	299B2	P. otitidis	FF, CEF, AMC, SU	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	+	−	−	−	−	−
EDM1	159B	P. fluorescens	T, S, G, N, CEF, SXT	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	+	−	−	−	−	−	−	−
EDM1	304A	P. otitidis	T, SU, SXT, AMC, S, G, CEF, FF	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	+	−	+	−	−	−	−	−
EDM1	306A	P. otitidis	FF, CEF, AMC, SU	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−
EDM1	85B	P. putida	SXT, AMC, C, FF	−	−	−	−	−	−	+	+	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−
EDM1	106	P. putida	T, SU, SXT, AMC, S, N	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	+	−	−	−	−	−	−	−
AFW	6B	P. fluorescens	T, S, G, K, CEF, SXT	−	−	−	−	−	−	+	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−
AFW	6A	P. fluorescens	T, S, G, K, C, CEF, SXT, AMC, SU, FF	+	−	−	−	−	+	−	+	−	+	+	+	−	+	+	−	−
OWODFW	350	P. otitidis	SXT, SU	−	−	−	−	−	+	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−
OWODM1	260	P. putida	FF, T, C, N, CEF, SXT, AMC, SU	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	+	−	+	−	−	−	−	−
OWODM2	251B	P. putida	T, S, C, SXT, SU	+	−	−	−	−	+	+	+	−	−	+	+	+	+	+	−	−
OWIRW	343B	P. otitidis	FF, T, S, N, CEF, AMC, SU	+	−	−	−	−	+	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	+	−	−	−
OWIRW	343A	P. otitidis	FF, K, C, SXT, N, CEF, AMC, SU	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	+	−	−	−	−	−	−
OWIRW	223	P. otitidis	FF, S, C, CEF, SXT, AMC, SU	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	+	−	−	−	−	−	−
OWRW	175B	P. putida	T, S, C, K, CEF, SXT, AMC, SU	+	−	−	−	−	+	+	−	−	+	+	−	+	+	+	−	−
OWIRW	342A	P. otitidis	FF, AMC, CEF, SU	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−	−
OWIM1	196	P. putida	FF, T, S, G, K, AMC, SU	+	−	+	−	−	+	−	−	−	+	+	+	−	+	+	−	−
OWIM2	244B	P. putida	FF, T, S, G, K, C, SXT, AMC, SU	+	−	−	−	−	+	+	+	−	+	+	+	+	+	+	−	−
			Total	7	0	1	0	1	7	6	5	0	9	8	8	3	6
			Percentages	31.8	0	4.6	0	4.6	31.8	27.3	27.3	0	40.9	36.4	36.4	13.6	27.3

Antibiotics code: FF florfenicol, T tetracycline, S streptomycin, G gentamicin, K kanamycin, C chloramphenicol, N nalidixic acid, AMC amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, CEF ceftiofur, SU sulfamethoxazole, SXT sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim

Source code: IFW Ife treated water, EDM1 Ede municipal Tap 1, AFW Asejire treated water, OWODM2 Owena Ondo Municipal Tap 2, OWIRW Owena-Idanre raw water, OWIM1 Owena-Idanre Municipal Tap 1, OWIM2 Owena-Idanre Municipal Tap 2

Fig. 1

Phylogenetic relationship of 16S rDNA of Pseudomonas spp from south western Nigeria water distribution system with sequence from gene bank

Antimicrobial susceptibility

Figure 2 and Table 3 showed the results of the percentage resistance of the studies bacteria and their phenotypic patterns of resistance, respectively. We observed among the studied Pseudomonas higher resistance to florfenicol (63.6 %), tetracycline (59.1 %), streptomycin (54.6 %), ceftiofur (59.1 %), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (81.8 %), sulfamethoxazole (77.3 %) compared to chloramphenicol (40.9 %), gentamicin (31.8 %), kanamycin (31.8 %) and nalidixic acid (22.7 %). From these results, it was noticed that these isolates were more resistant to older generation antibiotics (such as sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, streptomycin etc.) than new generation antibiotics such as (gentamicin, kanamycin and nalidixic acid). We also saw that out of 22 Pseudomonas spp isolated from all the sampled area 21 were multi-drug resistant (MDR) (Table 3). The MDR bacteria were selected based on resistant to over three classes of antibiotics.

Fig. 2

Percentage resistance of Pseudomonas spp to various antibiotics. FF florfenicol, T tetracycline, S streptomycin, G gentamicin, K kanamycin, C chloramphenicol, N nalidixic acid, AMC amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, CEF ceftiofur, SU sulfamethoxazole, SXT sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim

Molecular characterization of antibiotic resistance genes

Beyond the phenotypic determination, we tested for the presence of some antibiotic resistance genes which could have been mediating the antibiotic resistance in the Pseudomonas spp. Among the tetracycline resistance gene tested i.e. tet(A), tet(B), tet(E) and tet30 encoding resistant by efflux pump mechanism and tet(O) and tet(M) encoding resistant by protection of the ribosome. We observed that tet(A) was the highest occurred (31.8 %) followed by tet(E) and tet30 (4.5 %) (Table 3). We did not detect tet(B), tet(M) and tet(O) among the Pseudomonas isolates. Among three sulphonamide resistance genes tested for in this study. It was observed that sul 1 was the highest (31.8 %) detected followed by sul 2 (27.3 %) (Table 3). Sul 3 was not detected in any of the Pseudomonas while among the three extended beta lactamase (ESBL) genes: blaSHV, blaCTX, blaTEM, we observed that blaTEM was the highest (40.9 %) detected followed by blaSHV (27.3 %) while blaCTX was not detected at all (Table 3).

We also observed the presence of all three streptomycin resistance genes tested for in at least one of the isolates (Table 3). Aph(3″) and ant(3″) was the most detected, each was observed to be present in 36.4 % of isolates tested while aph (6)1d was the least (13.7) detected. Class 2 integron was not detected in any of the isolates (Table 3). Whereas, 6 (27.3 %) of the isolates showed the occurrence of class 1 integron.

Plasmid profiling

The presence of plasmid was observed in 10 (45.5 %) out of 22 Pseudomonas studied (Table 4). Each of the bacteria was observed to be carrying 1 plasmid each ranging between 22 and 130 kb in size. None of the bacteria showed the occurrence of more than one plasmid.

Table 4

Plasmid carrying Pseudomonas spp. isolated from selected water samples from southwestern Nigeria

Source	Bacteria/strain ID	Resistant phenotypes	No of plasmid and size
IFW	Pseudomonas sp (89)	T, S, G, K, C, SXT, AMC, SU	1 (95 kb)
EDM1	Pseudomonas sp (306A)	FF, CEF, AMC, SU	1 (95 kb)
AFW	Pseudomonas sp (6A)	T, S, G, K, C, CEF, SXT, AMC, SU, FF	1 (95 kb)
AFW	Pseudomonas sp (6B)	T, S, G, K, CEF, SXT	1 (95 kb)
OWODM2	Pseudomonas putida (251B)	T, S, C, SXT, SU	1 (22 kb)
OWIRW	Pseudomonas sp (175B)	T, S, C, K, CEF, SXT, AMC, SU	1 (55 kb)
OWIRW	Pseudomonas sp (342A)	FF, AMC, CEF, SU	1 (130 kb)
OWIRW	Pseudomonas sp (343B)	FF, T, S, N, CEF, AM, AMC, SU	1 (130 kb)
OWIM1	Pseudomonas sp (196)	FF, T, S, G, K, AM, AMC, SU	1 (120 kb)
OWIM2	Pseudomonas sp (244B)	FF, T, S, G, K, C, AM, SXT, AMC, SU	1 (130 kb)

Antibiotics code: FF florfenicol, T tetracycline, S streptomycin, G gentamicin, K kanamycin, C chloramphenicol, N nalidixic acid, AMC amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, CEF ceftiofur, SU sulfamethoxazole, SXT sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim

Source code: IFW Ife treated water, EDM1 Ede municipal Tap 1, AFW Asejire treated water, OWODM2 Owena Ondo Municipal Tap 2, OWIRW Owena-Idanre raw water, OWIM1 Owena-Idanre Municipal Tap 1, OWIM2 Owena-Idanre Municipal Tap 2

Discussion

Pseudomonad is one of the most important and ubiquitous pathogen that is significantly important medically [17]. Aquatic ecosystems could serve as a reservoir of antibiotic resistant pathogen through transfer of resistant plasmid [18]. Many studies on antibiotic resistance in pseudomonads had been carried out using strains of clinical origin [19]. This study selected 22 MDR Pseudomonas from drinking water distribution systems from southwestern Nigeria. These selected MDR strains showed high resistant to amoxillin/clavulanic acid (81.8 %), sulfamethoxazole (77.3 %) and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (72.7 %). Resistant to amoxillin/clavulanic acid is a little similar to the report of Mezue et al. [20] among Pseudomonas from urinary tract infection from Nigeria who reported 100 % resistant to the antibiotics in their studies. Moderate resistant to florfenicol (63.6 %), tetracycline (59.1 %), streptomycin (54.6 %) and ceftiofur (59.1 %) was observed among these Pseudomonads. The tetracycline resistance obtained in our study is similar to what Akinpelu et al. [21] reported among Pseudomonas from another river in Nigeria. The author reported 50 % resistant to tetracycline among their pseudomonads while higher (100 %) resistant to streptomycin compare to what we obtained from the isolates in this study.

Molecular characterization of the antibiotic resistance gene showed high prevalence of tet(A) (31.8 %), sul2 (27.8 %), blaTEM (40.9) for tetracycline, sulfa drug and β-lactamase antibiotic resistance, respectively. There appears to be few studies on the molecular characterization of these genes among Nigeria environmental pseudomonads, therefore, making it difficult to compare with studies from Nigeria. However, among few of the studies, Chikwendu et al. [22] reported the presence of blaSHV and blaTEM among environmental pseudomonads from Nigeria while Odumosu et al. [23] reported blaoxa-10, ampC β-lactamase in 50 and 70 % of Pseudomonasaeruginosa, respectively from Nigeria clinical source. The authors reported that only one of their isolates testing positive for blaSHV and blaCTXM-15. Studies have shown that due to overuse of β-lactam antibiotics, blaTEM and blaSHV enzyme that were originally found in enterobacteriaceae are now found in Pseudomonas [24]. Similarly, the authors also reported that blaSHV enzyme that has been found in Klebsiella, Escherichia and Salmonella can also be found in Pseudomonas. Moreover, in this study we did not detect blaTEM from any of the Pseudomonas studied from these water distribution systems.

We observed 36.36 % of our pseudomonas testing positive for each of aph(3″) and ant(3″) which are genes coding for enzymes that modifies aminoglycoside antibiotics. Odumosu et al. [23] also reported the presence of aminoglycoside modifying enzyme (AME) genes which include aac(6′)-I and ant(2″)-I in 50 and 45 %, respectively of their isolates from Nigeria clinical Pseudomonas. Publications on AME genes among Nigeria environmental Pseudomonas spp are also scarce. This could be the first time these genes will be described among pseudomonad from Nigeria environment. However, in Africa, Ndegwa et al. [25] reported the presence of AME in E. coli, klebsiella, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter from clinical isolates from Kenya. Though in this study, at least one of the AME genes occurred in at least one of these environmental bacteria. It has been reported that the incidence of streptomycin resistance in pathogenic and commensal bacteria in clinical and agricultural habitats is often high. This is most likely caused by the use of streptomycin in these environments [26]. We observed aph (3″) and ant (3″) to be more frequently detected in this study than aph (6)1d. This is similar to the study of van Overbeek et al. [27] among bacterial populations in European habitat. The authors reported that out of 22 bacteria isolates whose genomic DNA was extracted and amplified for streptomycin resistance gene, aph (3″) was the highest occurred, showing its presence in 17 isolates, followed by ant (3″) and aph (6)-1d (both present in 13 isolates), whereas the incidence of aph (6)-1c and ant (6) genes was lowest (present in one and zero isolates, respectively). Occurrence of one bacteria carrying more than one of streptomycin resistance genes was observed in this study. This is also similar to the report of van Overbeek et al. [27].

Similarly, tetracycline resistance gene has also not been described in among Pseudomonads from Nigeria. Although our recent report [28] stated the occurrence of tet(E), tet(M), tet(30) among Alcaligenes, tet(E) in Aeromonas and Klebsiella, tet(B) in Bacillus and Leucobacter from these water distribution systems. Absence of tet(B) but highest occurrence of tet(A) which are both efflux pump genes in these pseudomonads is contrary to the report of Shababi et al. [29] who reported more prevalence of tet(B) than tet(A) in their studies among MDR P. aeruginosa from municipal sewage. However, a study had shown that tet(A) has a broad host range and is often carried by various environmental genera [4]. None of the isolates showed the presence of tetracycline resistance gene [tet(O) and tet(M)] that cause resistant by producing protein that modifies the ribosome.

Occurrence of class 1 integron among these bacteria showed their potential ability to shuttle antibiotic resistance between different bacteria species. This is because integrons are mobile DNA element with the ability to integrate and express gene cassettes by site-specific recombination [30, 31]. Integrase sequence can insert many cassettes coding for different antibiotic resistance, therefore, making a single bacterium possessing it to be resistant to multiple antibiotics. Therefore, emergence of these MDR bacteria with class 1 integron could lead to reduce antibiotic treatment option which could result to an increase possibility of treatment failure, if they infect user of these water. In fact, most of the genes like aminoglycoside resistance, β-lactam resistance and sulpha-drug resistance have been reported as gene cassettes in association with class 1 integron [32]. Five of these pseudomonads were observed to test positive for the variable region of this class 1 integron. This implies the insertion of antibiotic resistant cassette in the integrase sequence and these resistance gene cassettes include aminoglycosides (aadA2, aadA1), trimethoprim (dfrA15, dfr7) and sulphonamide (sul1) resistance.

The size of plasmids observed from our study contradicts previous studies from Nigeria [6, 33] which reported low molecular weight plasmids (<2 kb) among bacteria from clinical isolates of P. aeroginosa. The relationship between plasmid profiles and MDR patterns observed in this study suggests that plasmids may have great role to play in the multidrug resistance of the Pseudomonas. Plasmids usually evolve as an integral part of the bacterial genome, consisting of several extra-chromosomal traits, one of which is their resistance genes, which can be exchanged among bacteria of different origins by conjugation [34]. Global dissemination of multiple antibiotic resistance and virulence traits by plasmids also poses an increasing threat to the successful treatment of bacterial infectious diseases in animals and humans alike [35]. Therefore, water sample containing these bacteria may be a source of transfer of antibiotic resistance genes to pathogenic bacteria of human, animal and environmental health significance.

Conclusion

In summary, the occurrence of MDR Pseudomonas harbouring various antibiotic resistance genes, class 1 integron and plasmid in drinking water systems signify that these environmental pseudomonads could significantly contribute to wide-scale transfer of resistance genes in these environments thereby posing health hazard to man and animals that depend on these water sources. This could play a major role in the epidemiology of antibiotic resistance in Nigeria and could also be responsible for prolong treatment of bacterial infection, the emergence of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. We hereby recommend integrated antibiotic resistant surveillance system and holistic one health approach as well as promoting prudent use of antibiotics both in clinical and agriculture settings in order to prevent and control multidrug resistant bacteria in southwestern Nigeria.