Literature DB >> 26328290

Is There Evidence of Failing to Fail in Our Schools of Nursing?

Angie Docherty, Nathan Dieckmann.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess evidence for "failing to fail" in undergraduate nursing programs.
BACKGROUND: Literature on grading practices largely focuses on clinical or academic grading. Reviewing both as distinct entities may miss a more systemic grading problem.
METHOD: A cross-sectional survey targeted 235 faculty within university and community colleges in a western state. Chi-square tests of independence explored the relation between institutional and faculty variables.
RESULTS: The response rate was 34 percent. Results suggest failing to fail may be evident across the sector in both clinical and academic settings: 43 percent of respondents had awarded higher grades than merited; 17.7 percent had passed written examinations they felt should fail; 66 percent believed they had worked with students who should not have passed their previous placement.
CONCLUSION: Failing to fail cuts across instructional settings. Further exploration is imperative if schools are to better engender a climate for rigorously measuring student attainment.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26328290     DOI: 10.5480/14-1485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Educ Perspect        ISSN: 1536-5026


  1 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of clinical competence in competency-based education.

Authors:  Teresa La Chimea; Zul Kanji; Susan Schmitz
Journal:  Can J Dent Hyg       Date:  2020-06-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.