Literature DB >> 26328114

Comparative outcomes of plasmakinetic versus monopolar transurethral resection of benign prostatic hyperplasia: 7 years' results.

Sakıp Erturhan1, Ömer Bayrak1, İlker Seçkiner1, Asaf Demirbağ1, Ahmet Erbağcı1, Faruk Yağcı1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We compared results from the standard monopolar or the bipolar plasmakinetic method for the transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) at 4 and 7 years after surgery (medium to long term).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the complete data from 124 patients who were alive and had 7 years of regular follow-up. Of those 124 patients with BPH, 65 (52%) underwent monopolar TURP (M-TURP) and 59 (48%) underwent plasmakinetic TURP (P-TURP). During the follow-up period, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), the maximal flow rate (Qmax) measured using uroflowmetry and the prostate specific antigen (PSA) values were recorded. Patients in whom alpha blockers were administered due to the growth of postoperative adenoma and who had been operated on due to urethral stricture, bladder neck contracture or a growing adenoma were also noted and recorded.
RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between M-TURP and P-TURP groups in any pre-operative or post-operative follow-up parameter at 4 or 7 years post-surgery. Specifically, PSA, IPSS and Qmax values; urethrotomies performed; alpha-blocker use; and the frequency of re-operations were statistically insignificant (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that when medium-to long-term results are compared, P-TURP and M-TURP appear to result in similar IPSS scores, Qmax values, complication rates and retreatment rates. Larger prospective studies are required to corroborate these results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monopolar; plasmakinetic; prostate; transurethral resection

Year:  2013        PMID: 26328114      PMCID: PMC4548604          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2013.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  12 in total

1.  Gyrus bipolar electrovaporization vs transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective single-blind trial with 1 y follow-up.

Authors:  W D Dunsmuir; J P McFarlane; A Tan; C Dowling; J Downie; J Kourambas; S Donnellan; N Redgrave; R Fletcher; M Frydenberg; C Love
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.554

2.  Plasmakinetic resection of the prostate versus standard transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective randomized trial with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  S Erturhan; A Erbagci; I Seckiner; F Yagci; A Ustun
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)--incidence, management, and prevention.

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler; Dogu Teber; Rainer Kuntz; Rainer Hofmann
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  A hybrid technique using bipolar energy in transurethral prostate surgery: a prospective, randomized comparison.

Authors:  Ahmet Tefekli; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu; Murat Baykal; Murat Binbay; Aytul Tas; Fatih Altunrende
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Transurethral resection of prostate with plasmakinetic energy: 100 months results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Ahmet Y Muslumanoglu; Emrah Yuruk; Murat Binbay; Tolga Akman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Electrovaporization of the prostate with the Gyrus device.

Authors:  H Botto; T Lebret; P Barré; J L Orsoni; J M Hervé; P M Lugagne
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Management of large (>60 g) prostate gland: PlasmaKinetic Superpulse (bipolar) versus conventional (monopolar) transurethral resection of the prostate.

Authors:  Manish Bhansali; Suresh Patankar; Sayten Dobhada; Suparn Khaladkar
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Transurethral resection of the prostate with a bipolar tissue management system compared to conventional monopolar resectoscope: one-year outcome.

Authors:  Chang-Jun Yoon; Ji-Yoon Kim; Ki-Hak Moon; Hee-Chang Jung; Tong-Choon Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  A prospective randomized study for comparing bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate with standard TURP.

Authors:  Ilker Seckiner; Cetin Yesilli; Bulent Akduman; Korhan Altan; N Aydin Mungan
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  PlasmaKinetic Superpulse transurethral resection versus conventional transurethral resection of prostate.

Authors:  Suresh Patankar; Arun Jamkar; Satyen Dobhada; Vaibhav Gorde
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.