OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and side effects of a cyclosporine microemulsion and tacrolimus in immunosuppressive therapy of renal transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between March 2003 and June 2005, the patients who had undergone kidney transplantation surgery and who were administered either basiliximab, a cyclosporine microemulsion, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone or basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone for baseline immunosuppressive therapy were recruited to our study. We evaluated the results of an 18-month follow-up period. The donors were called back weekly for a follow-up in the first month, fortnightly in the second month and then monthly for 18 months after discharge. A total of 41 patients were included in the study. The patients were evaluated as for demographic characteristics, acute rejection, cardiovascular and metabolic side effects, graft function, infections, hirsutism, gingival hyperplasia, cosmetic side effects, nephrotoxicity, drug changes and the survival rates. RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the patients with regard to age, sex, donor type, dialysis periods, preoperative and postoperative systolic blood pressures, creatinine levels, hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, occurrence of diabetes mellitus and the incidence of infection. The duration of hospitalization was prolonged in the cyclosporine A group. Acute rejection emerged in 5 patients (23.8%) in the tacrolimus group and in 4 patients (20%) in the cyclosporine A group. In the cyclosporin A group, the cholesterol and triglyceride levels were significantly higher than the tacrolimus group. The cosmetic side effects (gingival hyperplasia and hirsutism) as a reason for a change in medication were only observed in the cyclosporin A group, not in the tacrolimus group. A medication change was made in 8 patients in the cyclosporine A group and in 1 patient in the tacrolimus group. No death was observed in either group. Graft loss was observed in only 1 patient in the cyclosporine A group. CONCLUSION: Regarding the cosmetic side effects and hyperlipidemia, tacrolimus was found to be superior to cyclosporine A. Where hyperlipidemia is considered to be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, tacrolimus use should be considered as a more acceptable treatment modality. However, the immunosuppressive regimen should be evaluated individually.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and side effects of a cyclosporine microemulsion and tacrolimus in immunosuppressive therapy of renal transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between March 2003 and June 2005, the patients who had undergone kidney transplantation surgery and who were administered either basiliximab, a cyclosporine microemulsion, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone or basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone for baseline immunosuppressive therapy were recruited to our study. We evaluated the results of an 18-month follow-up period. The donors were called back weekly for a follow-up in the first month, fortnightly in the second month and then monthly for 18 months after discharge. A total of 41 patients were included in the study. The patients were evaluated as for demographic characteristics, acute rejection, cardiovascular and metabolic side effects, graft function, infections, hirsutism, gingival hyperplasia, cosmetic side effects, nephrotoxicity, drug changes and the survival rates. RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the patients with regard to age, sex, donor type, dialysis periods, preoperative and postoperative systolic blood pressures, creatinine levels, hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, occurrence of diabetes mellitus and the incidence of infection. The duration of hospitalization was prolonged in the cyclosporine A group. Acute rejection emerged in 5 patients (23.8%) in the tacrolimus group and in 4 patients (20%) in the cyclosporine A group. In the cyclosporin A group, the cholesterol and triglyceride levels were significantly higher than the tacrolimus group. The cosmetic side effects (gingival hyperplasia and hirsutism) as a reason for a change in medication were only observed in the cyclosporin A group, not in the tacrolimus group. A medication change was made in 8 patients in the cyclosporine A group and in 1 patient in the tacrolimus group. No death was observed in either group. Graft loss was observed in only 1 patient in the cyclosporine A group. CONCLUSION: Regarding the cosmetic side effects and hyperlipidemia, tacrolimus was found to be superior to cyclosporine A. Where hyperlipidemia is considered to be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, tacrolimus use should be considered as a more acceptable treatment modality. However, the immunosuppressive regimen should be evaluated individually.
Authors: M M Abou-Jaoude; R Najm; J Shaheen; N Nawfal; S Abboud; M Alhabash; M Darwish; A Mulhem; A Ojjeh; W Y Almawi Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 1.066