| Literature DB >> 26328061 |
Shokoofeh Jamshidi1, Setareh Shojaei2, Ghodratollah Roshanaei3, Shirin Modabbernia4, Esmaeel Bakhtiary5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Jaw bones might be potential locations for different lesions. Differences in prevalence and the type of lesions can help in designing and programming prevention procedures in health care centers.Entities:
Keywords: Jaw; Population; Prevalence
Year: 2015 PMID: 26328061 PMCID: PMC4552976 DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.17(5)2015.20374
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran Red Crescent Med J ISSN: 2074-1804 Impact factor: 0.611
Frequencies of Different Intraosseous Lesions Biopsied in the Maxillofacial in Terms of Radiographic Features Separately for Each Lesion Type [a,b]
| Lesion Type | Radiographic View | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radiolucent | Radiopaque | Mixed | Total | |
|
| 14 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 14 (100.0) |
|
| 153 (98.7) | 1 (6.0) | 1 (6.0) | 155 (100.0) |
|
| 31 (70.5) | 2 (4.5) | 11 (25.0) | 44 (100.0) |
|
| 13 (68.4) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (31.6) | 19 (100.0) |
|
| 36 (69.2) | 4 (7.7) | 12 (23.1) | 52 (100.0) |
|
| 247 (87.0) | 7 (2.5) | 30 (10.6) | 284 (100.0) |
a Data are presented as No. (%).
b Chi square = 56.4, degrees of freedom (df) = 8 and P value < 0.001; the relationship is significant.
Frequencies of Different Intraosseous Lesions Biopsied in the maxillofacial region in Terms of Different Age Groups Separately for Each Lesion Type [a,b]
| Lesion Type | Age, y | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 10 | 11 - 20 | 21 - 30 | 31 - 40 | 41 - 50 | 51 - 60 | Over 60 | Total | |
|
| 0 (0.0) | 3 (21.4) | 4 (28.6) | 3 (21.4) | 3 (21.4) | 1 (7.1) | 0 (0.0) | 14 (100) |
|
| 12 (7.7) | 34 (21.9) | 49 (31.6) | 27 (17.4) | 19 (12.3) | 6 (3.9) | 8 (5.2) | 155 (100) |
|
| 6 (13.6) | 12 (27.3) | 13 (29.5) | 7 (15.9) | 2 (4.5) | 1 (2.3) | 3 (6.86) | 44 (100) |
|
| 1 (5.3) | 6 (31.6) | 2 (10.5) | 4 (21.1) | 1 (5.3) | 4 (21.1) | 1 (5.3) | 19 (100) |
|
| 4 (7.7) | 14 (26.9) | 15 (28.8) | 10 (19.2) | 6 (11.5) | 1 (1.9) | 2 (3.8) | 52 (100) |
|
| 23 (8.1) | 69 (24.3) | 83 (29.2) | 51 (18.0) | 31 (10.9) | 13 (4.6) | 14 (4.9) | 284 (100) |
a Data are presented as No. (%).
b Chi square = 25.1, degrees of freedom (df) = 24 and P value = 0.432; the relationship was not statistically significant.
Frequencies of Different Intraosseous Lesions Biopsied in the Maxillofacial Region in Terms of Different Gender Groups Separately for Each Lesion Type [a,b]
| Lesion Type | Radiographic View | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Radiopaque | Total | |
|
| 12 (85.7) | 2 (14.3) | 14 (100.0) |
|
| 70 (45.2) | 85 (54.8) | 155 (100.0) |
|
| 20 (45.5) | 24 (54.5) | 44 (100.0) |
|
| 8 (42.1) | 11 (57.9) | 19 (100.0) |
|
| 28 (54.9) | 24 (45.1) | 52 (100.0) |
|
| 138 (48.8) | 146 (51.2) | 284 (100.0) |
a Data are presented as No. (%).
b chi-squa r = 9.6, degrees of freedom (df) = 4 and P value = 0.045.
Frequencies of Different Intraosseous Lesions Biopsied in the Maxillofacial Region of Patients Referring to all the Educational Pathology Centers of Hamadan Province From 1990 to 2010 [a]
| Lesion | Frequency [ | Mean Age, y | Female Frequency | Male Frequency | Radiolucent Frequency | Radiopaque Frequency | Mixed Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 51 (17.8) | 33.3 | 25 | 26 | 51 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 45 (15.7) | 30.3 | 17 | 28 | 45 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 26 (9.1) | 27.1 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 22 (7.7) | 26.8 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 21 (7.3) | 32.4 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 19 (6.6) | 22.7 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 12 (4.2) | 31.8 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 3 |
|
| 11 (3.8) | 33.5 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 11 (3.8) | 32.8 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
|
| 7 (2.4) | 24.1 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 6 (2.1) | 35.0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
|
| 5 (1.7) | 14.0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
|
| 5 (1.7) | 22.0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
|
| 5 (1.7) | 24.0 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 4 (1.4) | 22.0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 4 (1.4) | 30.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
|
| 4 (1.4) | 28.3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
|
| 4 (1.4) | 14.0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 4 (1.4) | 29.5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
|
| 3 (1.0) | 35.7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 3 (1.0) | 39.0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 3 (1.0) | 33.0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
|
| 3 (1.0) | 26.0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 2 (0.7) | 28.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 2 (0.7) | 13.0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 1 (0.3) | 35.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 1 (0.3) | 19.0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 1 (0.3) | 11.0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 1 (0.3) | 28.0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 1 (0.3) | 42.0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 287 (100%) | 29.06 | 139 | 147 | 250 | 7 | 30 |
a Abbreviations: OKC, odontogenic keratocyst; CGCG, central giant cell granuloma.
b Data are presented as No. (%).