Literature DB >> 26327914

Polyethylene glycol plus an oral sulfate solution as a bowel cleansing regimen for colon capsule endoscopy: a prospective, single-arm study in healthy volunteers.

Pankaj K Kashyap1, Ravit Peled2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: As with colonoscopy, adequate bowel cleansing is essential prior to colon capsule endoscopy (CCE). Because CCE requires that the capsule traverse the entire gastrointestinal tract during the examination, laxative 'boosters' are used. The objective of this prospective, single-center, single-arm study was to evaluate the safety of a bowel preparation consisting of polyethylene glycol (PEG) plus an oral sulfate solution.
METHODS: Subjects were healthy volunteers aged 50-75 years old with normal baseline serum chemistry. The bowel preparation consisted of 4 Senna tablets, 4 liters of PEG (split dose), 10 mg metoclopramide, 2 oral sulfate solution boosters (6 oz. and 3 oz.), and 10 mg bisacodyl. Serum chemistry was performed at baseline, following PEG intake, 24 hours after bisacodyl administration, and at 7 days post procedure (in subjects with abnormal 24 hour results). The primary endpoints were the percentage of subjects with a clinically significant change in serum chemistry at the last test and the adverse event (AE) rate.
RESULTS: A total of 25 subjects were enrolled. The serum chemistry was normal in all subjects at the final evaluation. One subject showed a slight elevation in creatinine (1.08 mg/dl 7 days post procedure from 0.84 mg/dl at baseline), deemed not clinically significant. Another subject had a transient elevation in serum creatinine (from 1.01 mg/dl at baseline to 1.45 mg/dl at 24 hours after the bowel preparation); values returned to near baseline at 7 days post procedure (1.06 mg/dl). There were no serious AEs, three moderate AEs related to the bowel preparation (nausea, headache, elevated creatinine) and two mild unrelated AEs (chills, abdominal cramping).
CONCLUSIONS: A bowel cleansing regimen of PEG plus an oral sulfate solution can be used in healthy volunteers. These data provide support for the continued study of this regimen in future CCE clinical trials and in medical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bowel preparation solutions; capsule endoscopy; colonoscopy; oral sulfate solution; polyethylene glycols

Year:  2015        PMID: 26327914      PMCID: PMC4530431          DOI: 10.1177/1756283X15586355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1756-283X            Impact factor:   4.409


  21 in total

Review 1.  Optimal bowel preparation--a practical guide for clinicians.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  A comparison of oral sulfate solution with sodium picosulfate: magnesium citrate in split doses as bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Jack A DiPalma; John McGowan; Mark vB Cleveland
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Colon capsule endoscopy: detection of colonic polyps compared with conventional colonoscopy and visualization of extracolonic pathologies.

Authors:  Alexander F Hagel; Erwin Gäbele; Martin Raithel; Wolfgang H Hagel; Heinz Albrecht; Thomas M de Rossi; Christine Singer; Thomas Schneider; Markus F Neurath; Michael J Farnbacher
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-02

Review 4.  Bowel preparation regimens for colon capsule endoscopy: a review.

Authors:  Shashideep Singhal; Sofia Nigar; Vani Paleti; Devin Lane; Sushil Duddempudi
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.409

5.  Colon capsule versus CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy: a prospective, comparative trial.

Authors:  Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Brunella Barbaro; Franco Iafrate; Paola Cesaro; Lucio Petruzziello; Leonardo Minelli Grazioli; Carlo Senore; Gabriella Brizi; Isabella Costamagna; Giuseppe Alvaro; Marcella Iannitti; Marco Salsano; Maria Ciolina; Andrea Laghi; Lorenzo Bonomo; Guido Costamagna
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Safety of oral sulfates in rats and dogs contrasted with phosphate-induced nephropathy in rats.

Authors:  Russell W Pelham; Robert G Russell; Eric L Padgett; Frederick E Reno; Mark vB Cleveland
Journal:  Int J Toxicol       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.032

7.  A pharmacokinetics evaluation of a new, low-volume, oral sulfate colon cleansing preparation in patients with renal or hepatic impairment and healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Russell W Pelham; Harry Alcorn; Mark vB Cleveland
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 3.126

8.  Colon capsule endoscopy is feasible to perform after incomplete colonoscopy and guides further workup in clinical practice.

Authors:  Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Nikos Viazis; Panagiotis Tsibouris; Georgios Zacharakis; Chryssostomos Kalantzis; Demetrios G Karamanolis; Spiros D Ladas
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  A randomized clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jack A Di Palma; Reynaldo Rodriguez; John McGowan; Mark v B Cleveland
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  A randomized, controlled trial of oral sulfate solution plus polyethylene glycol as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John McGowan; Mark vB Cleveland; Jack A Di Palma
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Magnesium Sulfate-Rich Natural Mineral Waters in the Treatment of Functional Constipation-A Review.

Authors:  Christophe Dupont; Guillaume Hébert
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.717

2.  Feasibility of patency capsule and colon capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected gastrointestinal stenosis: a prospective study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Otsuka; Masanao Nakamura; Takeshi Yamamura; Keiko Maeda; Tsunaki Sawada; Yasuyuki Mizutani; Eri Ishikawa; Takuya Ishikawa; Naomi Kakushima; Kazuhiro Furukawa; Eizaburo Ohno; Hiroki Kawashima; Takashi Honda; Masatoshi Ishigami; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 1.131

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.