Literature DB >> 26325670

The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer.

Hemamali Samaratunga1, Brett Delahunt, Troy Gianduzzo, Geoff Coughlin, David Duffy, Ian LeFevre, Shulammite Johannsen, Lars Egevad, John Yaxley.   

Abstract

The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) modified Gleason grading system was further amended in 2014 with the establishment of grade groupings (ISUP grading). This study examined the predictive value of ISUP grading, comparing results with recognised prognostic parameters.Of 3700 men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) reported at Aquesta Pathology between 2008 and 2013, 2079 also had a positive needle biopsy available for review. We examined the association between needle biopsy 2014 ISUP grade and 2005 modified Gleason score, tumour volume, pathological stage of the subsequent RP tumour, as well as biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS). The median age was 62 (range 32-79 years). Median serum prostate specific antigen was 5.9 (range 0.4-69 ng/mL). For needle biopsies, 280 (13.5%), 1031 (49.6%), 366 (17.6%), 77 (3.7%) and 325 (15.6%) were 2014 ISUP grades 1-5, respectively. Needle biopsy 2014 ISUP grade showed a significant association with RP tumour volume (p < 0.001), TNM pT and N stage (p < 0.001) and BRFS (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression model showed serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) at the time of diagnosis and ISUP grade >2 to be significantly associated with BRFS.This study provides evidence of the prognostic significance of ISUP grading for thin core needle biopsy of prostate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26325670     DOI: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathology        ISSN: 0031-3025            Impact factor:   5.306


  10 in total

Review 1.  One is the new six: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) patient-focused approach to Gleason grading.

Authors:  John R Srigley; Brett Delahunt; Lars Egevad; Hemamali Samaratunga; John Yaxley; Andrew J Evans
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Prognostic value of the new Grade Groups in Prostate Cancer: a multi-institutional European validation study.

Authors:  R Mathieu; M Moschini; B Beyer; K M Gust; T Seisen; A Briganti; P Karakiewicz; C Seitz; L Salomon; A de la Taille; M Rouprêt; M Graefen; S F Shariat
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 3.  Histopathology of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Peter A Humphrey
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 6.915

4.  Impact of artificial intelligence on pathologists' decisions: an experiment.

Authors:  Julien Meyer; April Khademi; Bernard Têtu; Wencui Han; Pria Nippak; David Remisch
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 7.942

5.  Histopathological Study of the Prostate Cancer Growth Patterns in Relation with the Grading Systems.

Authors:  Tudor Cristian Timotei Popescu; Alex Emilian Stepan; Mirela Marinela Florescu; Cristiana Eugenia Simionescu
Journal:  Curr Health Sci J       Date:  2022-03-31

6.  Prognostic implications of 2005 Gleason grade modification. Population-based study of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Frederik B Thomsen; Yasin Folkvaljon; Klaus Brasso; Stacy Loeb; David Robinson; Lars Egevad; Pär Stattin
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Oncological outcomes in an Australian cohort according to the new prostate cancer grading groupings.

Authors:  K R Beckmann; A D Vincent; M E O'Callaghan; P Cohen; S Chang; M Borg; S M Evans; D M Roder; K L Moretti
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  The current status of renal cell carcinoma and prostate carcinoma grading.

Authors:  Brett Delahunt; Lars Egevad; John Yaxley; Hemamali Samaratunga
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

9.  Predictive efficacy of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason grading system in initially diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guang-Xi Sun; Peng-Fei Shen; Xing-Ming Zhang; Jing Gong; Hao-Jun Gui; Kun-Peng Shu; Jiang-Dong Liu; Jinge Zhao; Yao-Jing Yang; Xue-Qin Chen; Ni Chen; Hao Zeng
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  The validation of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for patients with high-risk prostate cancer: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Jiandong Liu; Jinge Zhao; Mengni Zhang; Ni Chen; Guangxi Sun; Yaojing Yang; Xingming Zhang; Junru Chen; Pengfei Shen; Ming Shi; Hao Zeng
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 3.989

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.