Literature DB >> 26325627

Intravitreal Injection of Splice-switching Oligonucleotides to Manipulate Splicing in Retinal Cells.

Xavier Gérard1, Isabelle Perrault1, Arnold Munnich1, Josseline Kaplan1, Jean-Michel Rozet1.   

Abstract

Leber congenital amaurosis is a severe hereditary retinal dystrophy responsible for neonatal blindness. The most common disease-causing mutation (c.2991+1655A>G; 10-15%) creates a strong splice donor site that leads to insertion of a cryptic exon encoding a premature stop codon. Recently, we reported that splice-switching oligonucleotides (SSO) allow skipping of the mutant cryptic exon and the restoration of ciliation in fibroblasts of affected patients, supporting the feasibility of a SSO-mediated exon skipping strategy to correct the aberrant splicing. Here, we present data in the wild-type mouse, which demonstrate that intravitreal administration of 2'-OMePS-SSO allows selective alteration of Cep290 splicing in retinal cells, including photoreceptors as shown by successful alteration of Abca4 splicing using the same approach. We show that both SSOs and Cep290 skipped mRNA were detectable for at least 1 month and that intravitreal administration of oligonucleotides did not provoke any serious adverse event. These data suggest that intravitreal injections of SSO should be considered to bypass protein truncation resulting from the c.2991+1655A>G mutation as well as other truncating mutations in genes which like CEP290 or ABCA4 have a mRNA size that exceed cargo capacities of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved adeno-associated virus (AAV)-vectors, thus hampering gene augmentation therapy.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26325627      PMCID: PMC4877449          DOI: 10.1038/mtna.2015.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids        ISSN: 2162-2531            Impact factor:   10.183


Introduction

Retinal diseases are a leading cause of incurable severe visual dysfunction worldwide and hence a major public health problem. Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA, MIM204000) is the earliest and most severe of these diseases and a leading cause of blindness in childhood. It is characterized by major clinical, genetic, and physiopathological heterogeneity with non syndromic and syndromic forms, variable visual outcomes, and more than 45 disease genes with variable inheritance, pattern of expression, and retinal function.[1] The safety and efficacy of AAV-based gene replacement therapy in LCA patients harboring RPE65 mutations have paved the way for treating retinal diseases.[2,3,4] However, FDA-approved AAV vector genomes are limited in size. The 7.9 kb CEP290 cDNA are currently not amenable to AAV-based gene therapy. CEP290 encodes a 290 KDa centrosomal protein, which has an essential role in the development and maintenance of primary and motile cilia.[5,6,7] CEP290 mutations cause both nonsyndromic LCA and syndromic forms with renal, kidney, neural tube, central nervous systems, and/or bone involvement.[8] Over 100 unique CEP290 mutations are reported which include a recurrent deep intronic mutation underlying 10–15% of nonsyndromic LCA cases (c.2991+1655A>G).[8,9,10,11] This mutation is located in intron 26 where it activates a cryptic splice donor site downstream of a strong acceptor splice site. The transcription of the mutant allele gives rise to a mRNA retaining a 128 bp intronic sequence encoding a premature termination codon along with low levels of the wildtype transcript. Recently, we reported 2'-O-methyl-phosphorothioate (2'-OMePS) splice switching oligonucleotide (SSO) sequences which allowed correcting the aberrant splicing and ciliation in fibroblasts from patients harboring the mutation.[12] Delivery of 2'-OMePS SSOs to the retina is challenging. Approaches of systematically and topically delivered oligonucleotides have not been successful so far to reach intraocular tissues, probably due to the blood–retina barrier,[13] and the impermeable nature of the cornea,[14] respectively. Intraocular administration of SSO to target retinal cells has not been reported to our knowledge. A transgenic mouse harboring the human CEP290 mutant intron has been produced which does not recapitulate the human molecular and clinical phenotypes.[15] Here, studying the wild-type mouse, we report selective skipping of Cep290 premessenger RNA sequences using a unique intravitreal (iv) injection of SSO. We show that both the SSO and skipped mRNA were detectable for at least 1 month and that iv administration of oligonucleotides did not provoke any serious adverse event.

Results

We designed SSOs to skip exon 22 (disruption of the reading frame) and exon 35 (preservation of the reading frame) of the mouse Cep290 wild-type pre-mRNA, respectively. SSO sequences were designed using the m-fold and ESEfinder programs as described previously.[12] For each of the two exons, we produced a set of three 2′-OMePS oligonucleotides. Each set included one SSO targeting the donor splice site (m22D and m35D), one SSO recognizing an exonic splice enhancer (m22ESE and m35ESE), and one control oligonucleotide (m22ESEsense and m35ESEsense, i.e., sense versions of m22ESE, m35ESE SSOs, respectively; ). We assessed SSO-mediated skipping in mouse NIH3T3 fibroblasts as described previously (Supplementary Figure S1).[12] Transfection of the cells with the SSOs but not the control oligonucleotides resulted in the production of a mRNA lacking the targeted exon, and a significant reduction in wild-type mRNA and protein abundance, as determined by Sanger sequencing of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) products, RT-qPCR, and Western blot analysis of immune-precipitated cep290, respectively (Supplementary Figure S2). These data supported the efficiency and specificity of our SSOs to mediate Cep290 exon skipping in vitro. We thus assessed the retinal distribution of SSOs and splicing alteration using the iv delivery route. To this aim, we examined retinal sections and Cep290 mRNA from 8-week-old C57BL/6J mice eyes at day 2 following a unique and unilateral iv injection of variable doses (1, 5, 10 nmoles) of a fluorescently-labeled (6-FAM)-m22D SSO in saline solution (NaCl 9 g/l; pH = 8.7; 290 mOsm/kg); fellow untreated eyes were used as controls. Confocal microscopy analysis of retinal sections from injected eyes detected panretinal fluorescent signals (; Supplementary Figure S3). Signals in the photoreceptor cell layer were maximal at the highest SSO dose (10 nmoles; ). RT-qPCR analysis of retinal mRNA identified a transcript lacking exon 22 which in abundance increased with SSO concentrations (). No skipped Cep290 mRNA and no fluorescent signals were observed in uninjected fellow eyes (; Supplementary Figure S3), giving support to the view that iv administration of 2'-OMePS SSO allows manipulating the splicing of the Cep290 pre-mRNA in retinal cells, in a dose-dependent manner. To estimate the lifetime of SSOs and of mutant mRNAs after a unique iv injection, 10 nmoles of (6-FAM)-m35ESE SSO or (6-FAM)-m35ESEsense control oligonucleotides were injected. The distribution of the flurorescence and abundance of mutant mRNA in the retina were analyzed at days 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, and 30 postinjection (dpi) as described previously. We chose to use a SSO specific to exon 35 to preserve the reading frame and avoid degradation of mutant mRNA by nonsense-mediated mRNA decay mechanisms. Confocal imaging of retinal sections from eyes injected with the (6-FAM)-m35ESE SSO detected fluorescent signals in all retinal layers from 2 to 30 dpi (). In contrast, fluorescent signals arising from the (6-FAM)-m35ESEsense control oligonucleotide had disappeared at 12 dpi (), suggesting rapid clearance of oligonucleotides that do not find target. RT-PCR and RT-qPCR analysis of retinal mRNA detected the presence of Cep290 mRNA lacking exon 35 as confirmed by Sanger sequencing (not shown), after the injection of the SSO but not the control oligonucleotide (,). The abundance of mutant mRNA was maximum at 2 dpi and decreased gradually overtime but it was still measurable at 30 dpi. Surprisingly, that of the wild-type Cep290 mRNA was significantly reduced at all analysis time points including 30 dpi (), suggesting that the m35ESE SSO which target an exonic splice enhancer might recognize the mature mRNA in the cytoplasm of retinal cells, and cause double-stranded RNA-mediated interference. To assess this hypothesis, we measured the wild-type and mutant mRNA abundance at 2, 6, and 10 dpi of 10 nmoles of the m22D SSO, which targets a part of intronic sequence, absent in the cytoplasm. We observed a moderate decrease of the wild-type mRNA abundance consistent with the production of a mutant mRNA at the expense of the Cep290 pre-mRNA (Supplementary Figure S4). Together, these data are consistent with the hypothesis according to which SSOs recognizing exon-only sequences can be sequestrated by cytosolic mRNA molecules which are not subjected to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay.[16] The high expression of Cep290 in the retina[17] further supports this hypothesis. The subcellular expression of Cep290 mRNA in the mouse retina has not been documented to our knowledge. In the zebrafish, in situ hybridization analysis has shown that the gene is expressed in all retina cell layers, including the ganglion cell layer, the inner nuclear layer and the photoreceptors cell layer.[18] To assess whether photoreceptor cells contribute to the pool of switched mRNA, we designed a SSO specific to the photoreceptor-specific Abca4 gene.[19] Intravitreal injection of 10 nmoles of the Abca4-specific SSO (m10ESE) but not of its sense version (m10ESEsense) resulted in maintained (≥10 dpi) Abca4-specific splicing modification, as evidenced by agarose gel electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing of RT-PCR products (). This demonstrates that splicing can be manipulated in photoreceptor cells following a single iv injection of 2'-OMePS SSO. Finally, to evaluate the ocular toxicity of 2'-OMePS oligonucleotides, we injected 10 nmoles of the m35ESEsense oligonucleotide and we examined the retinal structure integrity, photoreceptor survival, and inflammatory response at 2, 12, and 30 dpi. Retinas from injected eyes were compared to retinas from uninjected contralateral eyes and retinas from 22-day-old rd10 mice eyes (Supplementary Figure S5). The rd10 mouse carries a spontaneous missense point mutation in Pde6b responsible for progressive retinal outer nuclear layer degeneration beginning at postnatal day 16.[20] Hematoxylin-eosin staining, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL), and glial fibrilary acidic protein labeling on histological sections of 22-day-old rd10 mice evidenced decreased thickness of the outer nuclear layer, apoptotic cells, and positive glial fibrilary acidic protein astrocytes, respectively (Supplementary Figure S5). In contrast, the retinal structure, TUNEL labeling, and glial fibrilary acidic protein staining of uninjected and injected eyes supported absence of retinal cell death and of inflammatory cell infiltration, respectively (Supplementary Figure S5). The transitory TUNEL labeling observed at 2 dpi in treated eyes likely arose from dUTP nick end labeling of the free 3'-end of the oligonucleotide (Supplementary Figure S6). The absence of deterioration of the retinal structure and the correlation between the clearance of the TUNEL labeling and that of the m35ESEsense oligonucleotide () strongly support this hypothesis.

Discussion

AAV-based gene therapy developments are ongoing worldwide to treat a wide range of inherited retinal diseases since the report of safety and efficacy in phase 1/2 clinical trials of a RPE65 gene augmentation therapy, by subretinal delivery of AAVs carrying the wild-type RPE65 cDNA.[2,3,4] A severe limitation of this approach however is the limited packaging capacity (~4.9 Kb) of AAV vectors. In addition to CEP290, several other of the most frequently mutated inherited retinal dystrophy genes, e.g., ABCA4, EYS, and USH2A have a cDNA size way exceeding this limit and hence are not amenable for AAV-based gene therapy. Other vectors (e.g., lentiviruses, adenoviruses) with a larger cargo capacity have a limited tropism for photoreceptor cells, and may produce insertional mutagenesis by integration into the host genome. Unintended gene overexpression and/or imbalanced expression of splicing isoforms are other severe limitations of gene augmentation therapy, especially when the gene, like CEP290, is transcribed into multiple isoforms and/or contribute to large protein complexes which stoichiometry has to be respected.[21,22] Rescuing aberrant pre-mRNA processing rather than supplementing a healthy cDNA copy of a gene that is mutated is an interesting therapeutic alternative. It is ideally suited to overcome both size limitations and unintended gene overexpression and imbalanced expression of splicing isoforms by maintaining endogenous transcriptional regulation of the target gene; acting at the pre-mRNA level allows correcting the genetic defect where and when the gene is expressed. Strategies have been developed which allow the modification of splice patterns of genes to bypass mutations that silence consensus splice sites and/or activate cryptic splice sites and hence promote exonic exclusion and/or intronic retention. Splicing can be altered by masking splice sites, or by targeting regulatory sequences to promote or to block splicing.[23] Drugs, isoform-specific antibodies, trans-splicing approaches, RNA interference, and antisense oligonucleotides have been investigated for their ability to modify splicing in various diseases.[23,24,25,26,27] Compared to most other molecules, nuclease-protected phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotides are of easy design[28] and inexpensive. In addition, they can be widely used to restore wild-type genetic configuration by allowing skipping of stray pseudoexons such as the one which arises from the splicing of pre-mRNAs harboring the recurrent LCA-causing CEP290 c.2991+1655A>G mutations.[12,29] Current ongoing trials in patients affected with Duchenne muscular dystrophy have shown that systemic delivery of 2′-OMePS SSOs on a short-term basis is well tolerated.[30,31,32] Systemic administration of 2′-OMePS SSOs to correct the abnormal splicing resulting from the CEP290 c.2991+1655A>G is hampered by the very efficient blood–retina barrier. Likewise the impermeable nature of the cornea hampers non-invasive topical delivery.[14] Here, we present data which demonstrate that iv administration of 2'-OMePS oligonucleotides allows alteration of Cep290 splicing in retinal cells, including photoreceptors as shown by successful alteration of Abca4 splicing using the same approach. We were able to detect both fluorescent signals arising from 6-FAM-labeled antisense oligonucleotides and skipped mRNA 1 month after a single iv injection. Interestingly, it has been previously reported that fluorescent signals in 6-FAM-injected eyes rat completely disappeared at 24 hours after iv injection.[33] The persistence over several weeks of fluorescent signals in eyes that received the labeled 2'-OMePS SSO indicates that the fluorescence is associated with the oligonucleotide itself rather than the fluorescent molecule that was used for labeling. In addition, we observed that the persistence of the fluorescence arising from 6-FAM sense oligonucleotides was strikingly reduced (lost between 2 and 12 dpi) compared to that arising from 6-FAM antisense oligonucleotides (still present at 30 dpi). This indicates that oligonucleotides which do not find target are rapidly cleared. This observation along with the progressive decrease overtime of skipped mRNA abundance in eyes injected with antisense oligonucleotides suggest that the detection of skipped mRNA at 1 month reflects active splice switching rather than mRNA stability. In this study, we analyzed the retina no longer than 1 month after injection. Other studies have however shown that RNA-interfering phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotides (PS-AON) could be detected in the retina of rodent and nonprimate humans as full-length oligonucleotide at least for 6 weeks and as N-1 for up to 12 weeks after injection.[33,34] Antisense oligonucleotides with modified phosphorothioate backbones (2'-OMePS SSO) have increased stability compared to PS-AONs.[35] Hence, it is likely that the effect of a single iv injection should exceed 4 weeks. CEP290 is a dynamic protein which can incorporate into preassembled mutant cilia transition zone. Providing functional CEP290 should allow restoring visual function as long as there are spared photoreceptors. LCA patients with CEP290 mutations have a neonatal-onset severe panretinal loss of photoreceptors.[10,36] While patients retain a central retinal zone of photoreceptors and an intact visual cortex for up to three decades, it has been suggested from gene augmentation therapeutic trials that the earliest the treatment, the better the effect.[36,37,38] Conversely, to subretinal administration which is limited central retina to avoid severe retinal detachment, intravitreal injections of 2'-OMePS seems suited for panretinal treatment. Indeed, following an iv injection of 6-FAM 2'-OMePS SSO, we were able to detect fluorescent signals in all retinal cell layers from the centre to the far periphery supporting the view that the oligonucleotides were able to distribute widely in the target tissue. An important concern before efficacy study of iv injection-based SSO-mediated therapy is to investigate the intraocular safety. Here, we report no adverse event at 1 month following a single iv injection of 10 nmoles of oligonucleotide in the mouse. Although this study is limited and 2'-OMePS SSO chemistry differs slightly for PS-AON, it is worth remembering that repeated iv injections of Vitravene, a 22-mer RNA interfering PS-AON has been approved by the FDA to treat CMV-induced retinitis in immune-compromised individuals.[39] In addition, it is worth noting that here the duration of the SSO effect over at least 1 month is consistent with iv injection-based treatment, even in children. Indeed, although iv injection is invasive, it is a very well-established mode of delivery of therapeutic molecules both in infants with acute retinal diseases and adults with acute or chronic retinal diseases.[40,41] The advantages of SSO-based therapy over viral-based gene augmentation protocols give strong justification to the development of oligotherapy as a mean to bypass the CEP290 c.2991+1655A>G mutation. SSO therapy is not limited to this important therapeutic target or to other deep intronic mutations. The vast majority of CEP290 mutations introduce a premature termination codon in the mRNA. In addition to isolated early-onset severe retinal degenerations, these mutations cause a wide spectrum of multisystemic ciliopathies.[8] Very recently, basal exon skipping (BES), a genetic mechanism through which deleterious mutations may be partially compensated for, has been reported to occur spontaneously at low levels in all CEP290 patient fibroblasts. The gradation of CEP290 dysfunctions likely correlates with the amount of near-full length protein retaining all or some of the full-length protein functionality that can be supplied to the cell through this mechanism.[42,43] The report of selective exclusion of an in-frame CEP290 exon with a premature termination codon through nonsense-associated altered splicing[44,45,46] in an individual with unexpectedly mild retinal disease[47] is quite consistent with the hypothesis. Interestingly, SSOs are ideally suited to enhance BES of mutant exons that begin and end in the same reading frame and which do not code for a crucial protein domain, to increase the abundance of minimally shortened mRNA and hence of near-full length functional CEP290 protein. What holds true for CEP290 could be true for other retinal proteins. Evidence of splicing alteration using intravitreal administration of SSO could open avenues to oligotherapy of a wide range of dysfunction affecting retinal cell wherever their geolocalization in the tissue. The study we report here was limited by the use of wild-type animals. Availability of a spontaneous animal model of severe retinal dystrophy due to an intronic CEP290 mutation, the rdAc cat, will hopefully help in making the proof of concept of therapeutic efficiency of iv injection based SSO-mediated therapy.

Materials and methods

Design of SSOs and control oligonucleotides (ONs). SSOs were designed from the wild-type mus musculus Cep290 (UCSC accession number uc011xmr.1) and AbcA4 (UCSC accession number uc008rel.1) sequences using the m-fold and ESEfinder[48] programs available online at http://mfold.rna.albany.edu/ and http://rulai.cshl.edu/cgi-bin/tools/ESE3/esefinder.cgi, respectively. SSOs were designed to target ESE and donor-splice site sequences of Cep290 exon 22 and 35 and an ESE sequence of Abca4 exon 10, respectively. Sense versions of SSOs (control ONs) targeting Cep290 and Abca4 ESE sequences were designed to control the specificity of SSOs. SSOs and control ONs were synthetized as fluorescently labeled (6-FAM) and unlabeled 2'-O-methyl phosphorothioate oligonucleotides by Sigma-Aldrich (St Quentin Fallavier, France). The positions of SSOs and control oligonucleotides are represented in . The sequences (5′-3′) were as following: m22ESE gaugacgaaucacugcaaac; m22ESEsense guuugcagugauucgucauc; m22D guuuucaaaauauaaauaccuuagguauuc; m35ESE caugaaggucuuccucaugc; m35ESEsense gcaugaggaagaccuucaug; m35D guucucagaaucuuaccugagcug; m10ESE caaagaaguaccagaucuggggcccuac; m10ESEsense guagggccccagaucugguacuucuuug. Intravitreal injection of SSOs and control ONs. All animal experiments adhered to the French regulation statement for the use of animals in ophthalmic and vision research. Eight-week-old C57BL/6J mice were used for these experiments. Prior to intravitreal injection, the animals were anesthetized by intramuscular injection of mixture solution of ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg). The left pupil was dilated by applying one drop of a mydriatic mix containing 10% phenylephrine and 0.5% tropicamide. A 30-gauge needle was used to make an initial puncture of the sclera. 1 µl of saline solution (NaCl 9 g/l, pH = 8.7) containing 1, 5, or 10 nmoles of (6-FAM)-m22D, (6-FAM)-m35ESE SSOs, or (6-FAM)-m35ESEsense oligonucleotide, respectively was injected through this hole using a 33-gauge needle attached to a 5 μl Hamilton syringe, under a binocular magnifier. The needle was kept in the vitreous cavity for about 20 seconds, then withdrawn gently and an antibiotic ointment was applied to prevent infection. The right eyes were left noninjected and used as controls. To assess splice alteration in photoreceptor cells, 10 nmoles of the m10ESE SSO and m10ESEsense oligonucleotide were respectively injected using the same procedure. Injected and contralateral untreated eyes were enucleated at variable time points from 2 to 30 dpi. Sampled eyes were either fixed in PFA 4%, washed in PBS and embedded in paraffin for histological analyses; or dissected to recover retinal RNA; as described below. Between two and five animals were used for each experimental setup. RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis. Total RNA from treated and untreated NIH3T3 cells and mouse retinas was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) according to manufacturer's protocol. All samples were DNase treated by the RNase-free DNase set (Qiagen). Concentration and purity of total RNA was determined using the Nanodrop-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Illkirch, France) before storage at −80 °C. First-stranded cDNA synthesis was performed from 500 ng of total RNA extracted using Verso cDNA kit (Thermo Scientific) with random hexamer:anchored oligo(dT) primers at a 3:1 (vol:vol) ratio according to the manufacturer's instructions. A non-RT reaction (without enzyme) for one sample was prepared to serve as control in RT-qPCR experiments. RT-PCR. To assess the efficiency of SSO-mediated exon skipping, cDNAs (5 µl) were amplified in 50 µl of 1× Phusion HF buffer containing 5 mmol/l dNTPs (Thermo Scientific), 0.02 units of Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific), and 10 µmol/l of each primer Cep290(ex21) forward, 5′-gaccaccttgagaaggaaac-3′ and Cep290(ex23) reverse, 5′-catcctgctcagcttgatc-3′ or Cep290(ex34) forward, 5′-cccaccaaactattgccaac-3′ and Cep290(ex36) reverse, 5′-gagagtcatcttgttctgctac-3′—or - Abca4(ex9) forward, 5′-tgatccagagcctggagtcaa-3′ and Abca4(ex11) reverse, 5′-ttcttctccgagctgcctatt-3′. PCRs were carried out on a 2720 Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Courtaboeuf, France) under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 98 °C for 5 minutes, followed by 30 cycles of 10 seconds denaturation at 98 °C, 30 seconds annealing at 60 °C and 30 seconds extension at 72 °C. The PCR products were separated (20 µl) by electrophoresis in a 3% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV lights. No template control reactions were used as negative control. The final confirmation of identity of these products was carried out by Sanger sequencing to establish that the correct and expected exon junctions have been maintained. Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). To measure the level of expression of mouse Cep290 mRNAs, the wild-type and mutant transcripts were amplified as 102 and 75 bp fragments (exon 22 skipping), respectively; or the wild-type and mutant transcripts were amplified as 100 and 62 bp fragments (exon 35 skipping), respectively. The mouse TATA boxbinding protein mRNA (Tbp, NM_013684.3), the mouse β-2-microglobulin mRNAs (B2m, NM_009735.3), the mouse β-glucuronidase mRNAs (Gusb, NM_010368.1), the mouse hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 mRNA (Hprt1, NM_013556.2), and the mouse peptidylprolyl isomerase A mRNA (Ppia, NM_008907.1) were used for normalization. The mouse albumin gene (Alb, NM_009654.3) was used to control the noncontamination of cDNAs by genomic DNA. Primers were designed using the Oligo Primer Analysis Software v.7 available at http://www.oligo.net. The specificity of primer pairs to PCR template sequences was checked against the NCBI database using the Primer-BLAST software (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast). Primer sequences were as follows: Cep290ex22wt forward, 5′-tgactgctaagtacagggacatcttg-3′; Cep290ex22wt reverse, 5′-aggagatgttttcacactccaggt-3′; Cep290ex22mt forward, 5′-ctggccccagttgtaatttgtga-3′; Cep290ex22mt reverse, 5′-ctgttcccaggcttgttcaatagt-3′; Cep290ex35wt forward, 5′-tgactgctaagtacagggacatcttg-3′; Cep290ex35wt reverse, 5′-aggagatgttttcacactccaggt-3′; Cep290ex35mt forward, 5′-ctggccccagttgtaatttgtga-3′; Cep290ex35mt reverse, 5′-ctgttcccaggcttgttcaatagt-3′. Reference genes Tbp forward, 5′-tgacctaaagaccattgcacttcgt-3′; Tbp reverse, 5′-ctgcagcaaatcgcttggga-3′; B2m forward, 5′-cctgtatgctatccagaaaacccct-3′; B2m reverse 5′-cgtagcagttcagtatgttcggctt-3′; Gusb forward, 5′-ctgcggttgtgatgtggtctgt-3′; Gusb reverse, 5′-tgtgggtgatcagcgtcttaaagt-3′; Hprt1 forward, 5′-gttggatacaggccagactttgtt-3′; Hprt1 reverse, 5′-aaacgtgattcaaatccctgaagta-3′; Ppia forward, 5′-ccaaacacaaacggttcccagt-3′; Ppia reverse, 5′-gcttgccatccagccattca-3′; Alb forward 5′-gggacagtgagtacccagacatcta-3′; Alb reverse 5′-ccagacttggtgttggatgctt-3′. cDNAs (5 μl of a 1:25 dilution in nuclease-free water) were subjected to real-time PCR amplification in a buffer (20 μl) containing SYBR GREEN PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and 300 nmol/l of forward and reverse primers, on a MasterCycler epgradients Realplex2 (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) under the following conditions: Taq polymerase activation and initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 minutes, followed by 50 cycles for 15 seconds at 95 °C, and 1 minute at 62 °C. The specificity of amplification products was determined from melting curve analysis performed at the end of each run using a cycle at 95 °C for 15 seconds, 60 °C for 15 seconds, and 95 °C for 15 seconds. Data were analyzed using the Realplex software (Eppendorf). For each cDNA sample, the mean of quantification cycle (Cq) values was calculated from triplicates (SD <0.5 Cq). Cep290 expression levels were normalized to the “normalization factor” obtained from the geNorm v3.5 software for Microsoft Excel which uses the most stable reference genes and amplification efficiency estimates calculated for each primer pair using fourfold serial dilution curves (1:5, 1:25, 1:125, and 1:625). No reverse transcriptase (non-RT), no template control reactions, and noncontamination of cDNAs by genomic DNA (Alb) were used as negative controls in each run (Cq values no template control = undetermined, non-RT >35 and Alb >35). The quantitative data are the means (±standard error of the mean) of three or more independent experiments and these are presented as ratio among values for individual mRNAs. Retinal distribution of fluorescence following a unique intravitreal injection of SSOs or control oligonucleotide. Seven-micron serial sections of tissues were prepared from paraffined treated and untreated eyes. To evaluate the dissemination of (6-FAM)-m22D, (6-FAM)-m35ESE SSOs and (6-FAM)-m35ESEsense oligonucleotide through the retina, the tissue sections were mounted onto glass slides with Prolong gold antifade mounting media containing 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Invitrogen) to stain nuclei and examined by confocal microscopy (ZEISS LSM700). Images were generated using the ImageJ software. Statistical analysis. The statistical significance of the difference between three or more means was determined using a Mann-Whitney test. Statistical analysis was performed using the Biostatgv program available online at http://biostatgv.sentiweb.fr. *P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Figure S1. Optimization of NIH3T3 transfections. Figure S2. SSO-mediated skipping of Cep290 exons 22 and 35 in NIH3T3 cells. Figure S3. Panretinal distribution of SSO following a unique intravitreal injection. Figure S4. Kinetic analysis of SSO-mediated Cep290 exon skipping following a single intravitreal injection in the C57BL/6J wildtype mouse. Figure S5. Toxicological evaluation of the retina. Figure S6. TUNEL-staining of oligonucleotides.
  48 in total

Review 1.  Progress in antisense technology.

Authors:  Stanley T Crooke
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 13.739

Review 2.  SR proteins as potential targets for therapy.

Authors:  Johann Soret; Mathieu Gabut; Jamal Tazi
Journal:  Prog Mol Subcell Biol       Date:  2006

Review 3.  Novel approaches to retinal drug delivery.

Authors:  Kumar G Janoria; Sriram Gunda; Sai H S Boddu; Ashim K Mitra
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.648

Review 4.  Antisense-mediated modulation of splicing: therapeutic implications for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Annemieke Aartsma-Rus
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 4.652

5.  Disruption of CEP290 microtubule/membrane-binding domains causes retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Theodore G Drivas; Erika L F Holzbaur; Jean Bennett
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Preclinical evaluation of a phosphorothioate oligonucleotide in the retina of rhesus monkey.

Authors:  Wei-Yong Shen; Kerryn L Garrett; Chang-Guan Wang; Kun Zhang; Zhi-Zhong Ma; Ian J Constable; P Elizabeth Rakoczy
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.662

7.  A novel nonsense mutation in CEP290 induces exon skipping and leads to a relatively mild retinal phenotype.

Authors:  Karin W Littink; Jan-Willem R Pott; Rob W J Collin; Hester Y Kroes; Joke B G M Verheij; Ellen A W Blokland; Marta de Castro Miró; Carel B Hoyng; Caroline C W Klaver; Robert K Koenekoop; Klaus Rohrschneider; Frans P M Cremers; L Ingeborgh van den Born; Anneke I den Hollander
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  CEP290 tethers flagellar transition zone microtubules to the membrane and regulates flagellar protein content.

Authors:  Branch Craige; Che-Chia Tsao; Dennis R Diener; Yuqing Hou; Karl-Ferdinand Lechtreck; Joel L Rosenbaum; George B Witman
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  The skipping of constitutive exons in vivo induced by nonsense mutations.

Authors:  H C Dietz; D Valle; C A Francomano; R J Kendzior; R E Pyeritz; G R Cutting
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-01-29       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Spectrum of NPHP6/CEP290 mutations in Leber congenital amaurosis and delineation of the associated phenotype.

Authors:  Isabelle Perrault; Nathalie Delphin; Sylvain Hanein; Sylvie Gerber; Jean-Louis Dufier; Olivier Roche; Sabine Defoort-Dhellemmes; Hélène Dollfus; Elisa Fazzi; Arnold Munnich; Josseline Kaplan; Jean-Michel Rozet
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.878

View more
  15 in total

1.  In vitro and in vivo rescue of aberrant splicing in CEP290-associated LCA by antisense oligonucleotide delivery.

Authors:  Alejandro Garanto; Daniel C Chung; Lonneke Duijkers; Julio C Corral-Serrano; Muriël Messchaert; Ru Xiao; Jean Bennett; Luk H Vandenberghe; Rob W J Collin
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Identification and Rescue of Splice Defects Caused by Two Neighboring Deep-Intronic ABCA4 Mutations Underlying Stargardt Disease.

Authors:  Silvia Albert; Alejandro Garanto; Riccardo Sangermano; Mubeen Khan; Nathalie M Bax; Carel B Hoyng; Jana Zernant; Winston Lee; Rando Allikmets; Rob W J Collin; Frans P M Cremers
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  A CEP290 C-Terminal Domain Complements the Mutant CEP290 of Rd16 Mice In Trans and Rescues Retinal Degeneration.

Authors:  Suddhasil Mookherjee; Holly Yu Chen; Kevin Isgrig; Wenhan Yu; Suja Hiriyanna; Rivka Levron; Tiansen Li; Peter Colosi; Wade Chien; Anand Swaroop; Zhijian Wu
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 9.423

4.  Identification and Correction of Mechanisms Underlying Inherited Blindness in Human iPSC-Derived Optic Cups.

Authors:  David A Parfitt; Amelia Lane; Conor M Ramsden; Amanda-Jayne F Carr; Peter M Munro; Katarina Jovanovic; Nele Schwarz; Naheed Kanuga; Manickam N Muthiah; Sarah Hull; Jean-Marc Gallo; Lyndon da Cruz; Anthony T Moore; Alison J Hardcastle; Peter J Coffey; Michael E Cheetham
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  From disease modelling to personalised therapy in patients with CEP290 mutations.

Authors:  Elisa Molinari; Shalabh Srivastava; John A Sayer; Simon A Ramsbottom
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-05-12

6.  Simple and complex retinal dystrophies are associated with profoundly different disease networks.

Authors:  Christina Kiel; Claire Lastrucci; Philip J Luthert; Luis Serrano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Antisense Oligonucleotide-Based Splicing Correction in Individuals with Leber Congenital Amaurosis due to Compound Heterozygosity for the c.2991+1655A>G Mutation in CEP290.

Authors:  Lonneke Duijkers; L Ingeborgh van den Born; John Neidhardt; Nathalie M Bax; Laurence H M Pierrache; B Jeroen Klevering; Rob W J Collin; Alejandro Garanto
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Antisense Therapy for a Common Corneal Dystrophy Ameliorates TCF4 Repeat Expansion-Mediated Toxicity.

Authors:  Christina Zarouchlioti; Beatriz Sanchez-Pintado; Nathaniel J Hafford Tear; Pontus Klein; Petra Liskova; Kalyan Dulla; Ma'ayan Semo; Anthony A Vugler; Kirithika Muthusamy; Lubica Dudakova; Hannah J Levis; Pavlina Skalicka; Pirro Hysi; Michael E Cheetham; Stephen J Tuft; Peter Adamson; Alison J Hardcastle; Alice E Davidson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Antisense oligonucleotide modulation of non-productive alternative splicing upregulates gene expression.

Authors:  Kian Huat Lim; Zhou Han; Hyun Yong Jeon; Jacob Kach; Enxuan Jing; Sebastien Weyn-Vanhentenryck; Mikaela Downs; Anna Corrionero; Raymond Oh; Juergen Scharner; Aditya Venkatesh; Sophina Ji; Gene Liau; Barry Ticho; Huw Nash; Isabel Aznarez
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Antisense Oligonucleotide Mediated Splice Correction of a Deep Intronic Mutation in OPA1.

Authors:  Tobias Bonifert; Irene Gonzalez Menendez; Florian Battke; Yvonne Theurer; Matthis Synofzik; Ludger Schöls; Bernd Wissinger
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 10.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.