| Literature DB >> 26325353 |
Cindy W Hamilton1,2, Art Gertel3, Adam Jacobs4, Jackie Marchington5, Shelley Weaver6, Karen Woolley7,8,9.
Abstract
To meet ethical and scientific obligations, authors should submit timely, high-quality manuscripts. Authors, however, can encounter ethical (e.g., authorship designation) and practical (e.g., time and resource limitations) challenges during manuscript preparation. Could professional medical writers-not ghostwriters-help authors address these challenges? This essay summarizes evidence countering three myths that may have hindered authors from considering the use of professional medical writers. Authors with sufficient time, writing expertise, and reporting guideline knowledge may meet their obligations without writing assistance. Unfortunately, not all authors are in this position. Decisions about writing support should be based on evidence, not myths.Keywords: Authorship; collaboration; conflict of interest; publication; publication ethics; science communication
Year: 2016 PMID: 26325353 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2015.1088788
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Account Res ISSN: 0898-9621 Impact factor: 2.622