Literature DB >> 26324362

Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Compared With Fluorouracil/Folinic Acid As Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III Colon Cancer: Final Results of the NO16968 Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial.

Hans-Joachim Schmoll1, Josep Tabernero2, Jean Maroun2, Filippo de Braud2, Timothy Price2, Eric Van Cutsem2, Mark Hill2, Silke Hoersch2, Karen Rittweger2, Daniel G Haller2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the final efficacy findings and biomarker analysis from the NO16968 trial comparing bolus fluorouracil/folinic acid (FU/FA) with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) in resected stage III colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After curative resection, patients were randomly assigned to receive XELOX, as oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks, or bolus FU/FA, as the Mayo Clinic or Roswell Park regimens, for 6 months. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population comprised 1,886 patients (XELOX, n = 944; FU/FA, n = 942). Seven-year DFS rates were 63% and 56% in the XELOX and FU/FA groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.93; P = .004). Seven-year OS rates were 73% and 67% in the XELOX and FU/FA groups, respectively (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.99; P = .04). A total of 68% and 77% of patients who experienced relapse or a new colorectal cancer in the XELOX and FU/FA groups, respectively, received drug treatment for metastatic disease. Four hundred ninety-eight patients consented to the biomarker analysis: 242 in the XELOX group and 256 in the FU/FA group. Low tumor expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase may be predictive for XELOX efficacy; in the XELOX group, for high versus low dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression levels, DFS HR was 2.45 (95% CI, 1.55 to 3.86; P < .001), and OS HR was 2.75 (95% CI, 1.65 to 4.59; P < .001). In the FU/FA group, no statistically significant associations were observed between any tumor biomarker and outcomes.
CONCLUSION: XELOX improved OS compared with bolus FU/FA in patients with resected stage III colon cancer after a median follow-up of almost 7 years. XELOX should be considered a standard adjuvant treatment option in patients with stage III disease. Tumoral dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression is a promising predictive, and potentially, highly clinically relevant, biomarker for XELOX efficacy requiring further prospective evaluation.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26324362     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.60.9107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  71 in total

Review 1.  The Prognostic and Predictive Value of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase-Related Indicators in Clinical Outcomes of Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaojun Sun; Shilei Guo
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 2.  Non-operative management of rectal cancer: understanding tumor biology.

Authors:  Iris H Wei; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Overexpression of long non-coding RNA colon cancer-associated transcript 2 is associated with advanced tumor progression and poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Junling Zhang; Yong Jiang; Jing Zhu; Tao Wu; Ju Ma; Chuang Du; Shanwen Chen; Tengyu Li; Jinsheng Han; Xin Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Impact of venous invasion on the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with stage III colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nobuaki Hoshino; Kenji Kawada; Koya Hida; Saori Goto; Ryuji Uozumi; Suguru Hasegawa; Kenichi Sugihara; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Final report of KSCC0803: feasibility study of capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Kazuhito Minami; Masaru Morita; Yasunori Emi; Masahiro Okamoto; Eiji Tanaka; Shigeyuki Nagata; Tetsuo Touyama; Kippei Ohgaki; Takaho Tanaka; Hiroshi Okumura; Toyokuni Suenaga; Shoji Tokunaga; Eiji Oki; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Yoshito Akagi; Hideo Baba; Shoji Natsugoe; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Comparison of Capecitabine (Xeloda) vs. Combination of Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (XELOX) as Neoadjuvant CRT for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Ali Yaghobi Joybari; Payam Azadeh; Siamak Babaei; Farnaz Hosseini Kamal
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 3.201

7.  Does adjuvant chemotherapy improve the prognosis of patients after resection of pulmonary metastasis from colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Yuen Tan; Huimian Xu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Peritoneal Metastases: Prevention and Treatment.

Authors:  Paul H Sugarbaker
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-02-04

9.  Effect of Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy With or Without Chemoradiation on Bowel Function in Rectal Cancer Patients Treated With Total Mesorectal Excision.

Authors:  Felipe Quezada-Diaz; Rosa M Jimenez-Rodriguez; Emmanouil P Pappou; J Joshua Smith; Sujata Patil; Iris Wei; Jose G Guillem; Philip B Paty; Garrett M Nash; Martin R Weiser; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Adjuvant Therapy Trials.

Authors:  Carling Ursem; Katherine Van Loon; Alan Venook
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.