| Literature DB >> 26322021 |
Christopher J Doona1, Florence E Feeherry1, Kenneth Kustin2, Gene G Olinger3, Peter Setlow4, Alexander J Malkin5, Terrance Leighton6.
Abstract
Recently, global public health organizations such as Doctors without Borders (MSF), the World Health Organization (WHO), Public Health Canada, National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the U.S. government developed and deployed Field Decontamination Kits (FDKs), a novel, lightweight, compact, reusable decontamination technology to sterilize Ebola-contaminated medical devices at remote clinical sites lacking infra-structure in crisis-stricken regions of West Africa (medical waste materials are placed in bags and burned). The basis for effectuating sterilization with FDKs is chlorine dioxide (ClO2) produced from a patented invention developed by researchers at the US Army Natick Soldier RD&E Center (NSRDEC) and commercialized as a dry mixed-chemical for bacterial spore decontamination. In fact, the NSRDEC research scientists developed an ensemble of ClO2 technologies designed for different applications in decontaminating fresh produce; food contact and handling surfaces; personal protective equipment; textiles used in clothing, uniforms, tents, and shelters; graywater recycling; airplanes; surgical instruments; and hard surfaces in latrines, laundries, and deployable medical facilities. These examples demonstrate the far-reaching impact, adaptability, and versatility of these innovative technologies. We present herein the unique attributes of NSRDEC's novel decontamination technologies and a Case Study of the development of FDKs that were deployed in West Africa by international public health organizations to sterilize Ebola-contaminated medical equipment. FDKs use bacterial spores as indicators of sterility. We review the properties and structures of spores and the mechanisms of bacterial spore inactivation by ClO2. We also review mechanisms of bacterial spore inactivation by novel, emerging, and established non-thermal technologies for food preservation, such as high pressure processing, irradiation, cold plasma, and chemical sanitizers, using an array of Bacillus subtilis mutants to probe mechanisms of spore germination and inactivation. We employ techniques of high-resolution atomic force microscopy and phase contrast microscopy to examine the effects of γ-irradiation on bacterial spores of Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus thuringiensis, and Bacillus atrophaeus spp. and of ClO2 on B. subtilis spores, and present in detail assays using spore bio-indicators to ensure sterility when decontaminating with ClO2.Entities:
Keywords: Ebola; chrloine dioxide; decontamination technologies; military medicine; spores
Year: 2015 PMID: 26322021 PMCID: PMC4533522 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00663
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Acronyms and attributes of NSRDEC decontamination technologies.
| Acronym | Technology | Attributes |
|---|---|---|
| NCC | Dry powders mix with water | |
| PCS | Plastic suitcase sterilizer | |
| D-FENS | Collapsible handheld sprayer | |
| D-FEND ALL | All purpose decontamination | |
| CoD | In-package disinfectant | |
| FDK | Ebola disinfectant | |
Spore strip bio-indicator characteristics.
| Species | ATCC# | Lot# | Population | D160 value | DEtO value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9372 | 1162052 | 2.0 × 106 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 44.5 | |
| 9372 | 1161841 | 1.3 × 106 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 23.5 | |
| 9372 | 1161911 | 1.3 × 106 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 46.0 | |
| 9372 | 1142042 | 1.2 × 104 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 39.0 | |
| 9372 | 1152041 | 1.2 × 105 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 39.0 | |
| 9372 | 1162043 | 1.2 × 106 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 39.0 | |
| 9372 | 1172041 | 1.2 × 107 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 39.0 | |
| 9372 | 1142141 | 3.5 × 104 | 2.8 | 5.0 | 33.3 | |
| 9372 | 1152141 | 2.0 × 105 | 2.8 | 5.0 | 33.3 | |
| 9372 | 1162141 | 1.5 × 106 | 2.8 | 5.0 | 33.3 | |
| 9372 | 1172141 | 1.5 × 107 | 2.8 | 5.0 | 33.3 | |
| 9372 | 1182141 | 1.5 × 108 | 2.8 | 5.0 | 33.3 | |
| 29730 | 616022 | 1.2 × 106 | n/a | n/a | n/a | |
| 7953 | 3166031 | 1.0 × 106 | 2.0 | 0.07 | 7.5 | |
Experimental ClO2 target and actual concentrations.
| ClO2 concentration (ppm) | ClO2 dose | %RH | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target | Measurement | SD | Target | Measurement | SD | Target | Measurement | SD |
| 50 | 50 | 4 | 400 | 414 | 20 | 30 | 30.32 | 0.006 |
| 67 | 68 | 4 | 1000 | 1037 | 32 | 40 | 38.75 | 0.011 |
| 100 | 110 | 17 | 2000 | 2020 | 40 | 50 | 49.51 | 0.015 |
| 125 | 131 | 6 | 4000 | 4046 | 88 | 60 | 59.41 | 0.013 |
| 167 | 177 | 21 | 70 | 69.36 | 0.011 | |||
| 200 | 218 | 14 | 80 | 79.42 | 0.015 | |||
| 250 | 256 | 23 | 90 | 89.67 | 0.01 | |||
| 400 | 405 | 31 | ||||||
| 500 | 498 | 40 | ||||||
| 800 | 784 | 53 | ||||||
| 1000 | 1027 | 115 | ||||||
| 2000 | 2027 | 303 | ||||||
Tyvek spore strip data summary.
| Species | Runs | Dose | %RH | DEtO | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyvek | No pkg | (ppm ClO2× t) | ||||
| 152 | 144 | 1.2 × 104–1.0 × 106 | 110–1991 | 79 | 3.1 | |
| 490 | 350 | 3.5 × 104–1.5 × 108 | 110–1991 | 79 | 5.0 | |
| 500 | 500 | 1.3 × 106 | 438–4106 | 30–90 | 3.3 | |
| 498 | 495 | 1.3 × 106 | 438–4106 | 30–90 | 3.8 | |
| 98 | 98 | 1.2 × 106 | 438–4106 | 79 | – | |
| 80 | 80 | 1.0 × 106 | 438–4106 | 79 | – | |
Laboratory tests of FDKs and the PCS.
| Test code | Container | Conditions | Observations | Microbiological Results | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test a | 2.5-gal bag | - 15 g Part A | Reaction in 2:20 | Sterilizeda,b | |
| - 4 g Part B | RH >96.4% | ||||
| - 30 mL H2O (tap) | |||||
| in a 100 mL beaker | [ClO2] >7000 ppm | ||||
| Test h | 10-gal bag | - 15g Part A | Reaction at 2:10 | Sterilizeda,b | |
| - 4 g Part B | RH >74% | ||||
| - 30 mL H2O (tap) | |||||
| in a 100 mL beaker | |||||
| Test i | PCS | - 16 g Part A | Reaction in 2:30 | Sterilizeda,b | |
| - 4 g Part B | RH >96.2% | ||||
| - 30 mL H2O (tap) | |||||
| in a 100 mL beaker | [ClO2] >7000 ppm | ||||
| Test n | PCS | - 15g Part A | Reaction at 2:12 | Sterilizeda,b | |
| - 4 g Part B | RH >93.5% | ||||
| - 30 mL H2O (tap) | [ClO2] >7000 ppm | ||||
| in a 100 mL beaker | Run time 15 min |
Spore height determinations.
| Spore species | Spore height air-dried (solution-grown) | Spore height air-dried (agar-grown) |
|---|---|---|
| 750–1000 nm | 740–1080 nm | |
| avg ≈ 872 nm | average ≈ 937 nm | |
| (AD = 5.4%) | (AD = 5.3%) | |
| (AD = 5.4%) | (AD = 5.3%) | |
| 800–880 nm | 750–800 nm | |
| average ≈ 835 nm | average ≈ 780 nm | |
| (AD = 5.4%) | (AD = 5.4%) |
Mechanisms of spore killing by and resistance to various agents∗.
| Type of agent | Mechanisms of killing | Mechanisms of resistance |
|---|---|---|
| HPP | Probably protein damage | Low core water content |
| UV, γ-radiation, nitrite, formaldehyde | DNA damage | α/β-type SASP, DNA repair, and perhaps IM impermeability |
| Oxidizing agents (OCl-, ClO2, O3) | IM damage | Spore coat/outer membrane |
| H2O2 | Probably core protein damage | α/β-type SASP, low core water |
| OH-, wet heat, some oxidizing agents | Inability to germinate | Spore coat/outer membrane |
| Strong mineral acid | Explosive rupture of IM | Not studied |
| Plasma | Protein or DNA damage1 | α/β-type SASP, spore coat, DNA repair |
| Wet heat | Protein damage | α/β-type SASP, low core water content |
| Dry heat | DNA damage | α/β-type SASP, DPA, DNA repair |