| Literature DB >> 26321463 |
Anna Pursiheimo1,2, Anni P Vehmas1, Saira Afzal1, Tomi Suomi1,3, Thaman Chand1, Leena Strauss4, Matti Poutanen4, Anne Rokka1, Garry L Corthals1,5, Laura L Elo1,2.
Abstract
As tools for quantitative label-free mass spectrometry (MS) rapidly develop, a consensus about the best practices is not apparent. In the work described here we compared popular statistical methods for detecting differential protein expression from quantitative MS data using both controlled experiments with known quantitative differences for specific proteins used as standards as well as "real" experiments where differences in protein abundance are not known a priori. Our results suggest that data-driven reproducibility-optimization can consistently produce reliable differential expression rankings for label-free proteome tools and are straightforward in their application.Keywords: ROTS; label-free mass spectrometry; proteomics; quantitative analysis; reproducibility; statistical methods
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26321463 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00183
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Proteome Res ISSN: 1535-3893 Impact factor: 4.466