Francisco Gelpi-Hammerschmidt1, Ilker Tinay2, Christopher B Allard1, Li-Ming Su3, Mark A Preston4, Quoc-Dien Trinh5, Adam S Kibel4, Ye Wang6, Benjamin I Chung7, Steven L Chang5. 1. Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Urology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: itinay@partners.org. 3. Department of Urology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida. 4. Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 7. Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We evaluate the contemporary incidence and consequences of postoperative rhabdomyolysis after extirpative renal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a population based, retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent extirpative renal surgery with a diagnosis of a renal mass or renal cell carcinoma in the United States between 2004 and 2013. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate 90-day mortality (Clavien grade V), nonfatal major complications (Clavien grade III-IV), hospital readmission rates, direct costs and length of stay. RESULTS: The final weighted cohort included 310,880 open, 174,283 laparoscopic and 69,880 robotic extirpative renal surgery cases during the 10-year study period, with 745 (0.001%) experiencing postoperative rhabdomyolysis. The presence of postoperative rhabdomyolysis led to a significantly higher incidence of 90-day nonfatal major complications (34.7% vs 7.3%, p <0.05) and higher 90-day mortality (4.4% vs 1.02%, p <0.05). Length of stay was twice as long for patients with postoperative rhabdomyolysis (incidence risk ratio 1.83, 95% CI 1.56-2.15, p <0.001). The robotic approach was associated with a higher likelihood of postoperative rhabdomyolysis (vs laparoscopic approach, OR 2.43, p <0.05). Adjusted 90-day median direct hospital costs were USD 7,515 higher for patients with postoperative rhabdomyolysis (p <0.001). Our model revealed that the combination of obesity and prolonged surgery (more than 5 hours) was associated with a higher likelihood of postoperative rhabdomyolysis developing. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that postoperative rhabdomyolysis is an uncommon complication among patients undergoing extirpative renal surgery, but has a potentially detrimental impact on surgical morbidity, mortality and costs. Male gender, comorbidities, obesity, prolonged surgery (more than 5 hours) and a robotic approach appear to place patients at higher risk for postoperative rhabdomyolysis.
PURPOSE: We evaluate the contemporary incidence and consequences of postoperative rhabdomyolysis after extirpative renal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a population based, retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent extirpative renal surgery with a diagnosis of a renal mass or renal cell carcinoma in the United States between 2004 and 2013. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate 90-day mortality (Clavien grade V), nonfatal major complications (Clavien grade III-IV), hospital readmission rates, direct costs and length of stay. RESULTS: The final weighted cohort included 310,880 open, 174,283 laparoscopic and 69,880 robotic extirpative renal surgery cases during the 10-year study period, with 745 (0.001%) experiencing postoperative rhabdomyolysis. The presence of postoperative rhabdomyolysis led to a significantly higher incidence of 90-day nonfatal major complications (34.7% vs 7.3%, p <0.05) and higher 90-day mortality (4.4% vs 1.02%, p <0.05). Length of stay was twice as long for patients with postoperative rhabdomyolysis (incidence risk ratio 1.83, 95% CI 1.56-2.15, p <0.001). The robotic approach was associated with a higher likelihood of postoperative rhabdomyolysis (vs laparoscopic approach, OR 2.43, p <0.05). Adjusted 90-day median direct hospital costs were USD 7,515 higher for patients with postoperative rhabdomyolysis (p <0.001). Our model revealed that the combination of obesity and prolonged surgery (more than 5 hours) was associated with a higher likelihood of postoperative rhabdomyolysis developing. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that postoperative rhabdomyolysis is an uncommon complication among patients undergoing extirpative renal surgery, but has a potentially detrimental impact on surgical morbidity, mortality and costs. Male gender, comorbidities, obesity, prolonged surgery (more than 5 hours) and a robotic approach appear to place patients at higher risk for postoperative rhabdomyolysis.
Authors: Abhinav Sidana; Annerleim Walton-Diaz; Hong Truong; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Ning Miao; Johanna Shih; Andrew Mannes; Gennady Bratslavsky; W Marston Linehan; Adam R Metwalli Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 2.370