Literature DB >> 26321342

Effect of low-frequency mechanical vibration on orthodontic tooth movement.

Sumit Yadav1, Thomas Dobie2, Amir Assefnia3, Himank Gupta3, Zana Kalajzic4, Ravindra Nanda5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to investigate the effect of low-frequency mechanical vibration (LFMV) on the rate of tooth movement, bone volume fraction, tissue density, and the integrity of the periodontal ligament. Our null hypothesis was that there would be no difference in the amount of tooth movement between different values of LFMV.
METHODS: Sixty-four male CD1 mice, 12 weeks old, were used for orthodontic tooth movement. The mice were randomly divided into 2 groups: control groups (baseline; no spring + 5 Hz; no spring + 10 Hz; and no spring + 20 Hz) and experimental groups (spring + no vibration; spring + 5 Hz; spring + 10 Hz; and spring + 20 Hz). In the experimental groups, the first molars were moved mesially for 2 weeks using nickel-titanium coil springs delivering 10 g of force. In the control and experimental groups, LFMV was applied at 5, 10, or 20 Hz. Microfocus x-ray computed tomography analysis was used for tooth movement measurements, bone volume fraction, and tissue density. Additionally, immunostaining for sclerostin, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining, and picrosirius red staining were used on the histologic sections. Simple descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare the outcomes across treatment groups.
RESULTS: LFMV did not increase the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Microfocus x-ray computed tomography analysis showed increases in bone volume fractions and tissue densities with applications of LFMV. Sclerostin expression was decreased with 10 and 20 Hz vibrations in both the control and experimental groups. Additionally, the picrosirius staining showed that LFMV helped in maintaining the thickness and integrity of collagen fibers in the periodontal ligament.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant increase in tooth movement by applying LFMV when compared with the control groups (spring + no vibration).
Copyright © 2015 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26321342     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.03.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  14 in total

1.  Effects of Electric-Toothbrush Vibrations on the Expression of Collagen and Non-Collagen Proteins through the Focal Adhesion Kinase Signaling Pathway in Gingival Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Kumiko Nakai; Hideki Tanaka; Kyoko Fukuzawa; Jyunya Nakajima; Manami Ozaki; Nobue Kato; Takayuki Kawato
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  Effects of compressive stress combined with mechanical vibration on osteoclastogenesis in RAW 264.7 cells.

Authors:  Boontida Changkhaokham; Sumit Suamphan; Prasit Pavasant; Suwanna Jitpukdeebodintra; Chidchanok Leethanakul
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.684

3.  The effect of compressive force combined with mechanical vibration on human alveolar bone osteoblasts.

Authors:  Chatchai Chatmahamongkol; Anute Pravitharangul; Srisurang Suttapreyasri; Chidchanok Leethanakul
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2018-10-16

4.  Biostimulatory Effects of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement and Associated Pain, Applied at 3-Week Intervals: A Split-Mouth Study.

Authors:  Irfan Qamruddin; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Verda Mahroof; Meenaz Karim; Mubassar Fida; Mohd Fadhli Khamis; Adam Husein
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.037

5.  Sclerostin Promotes Bone Remodeling in the Process of Tooth Movement.

Authors:  Rui Shu; Ding Bai; Tzongjen Sheu; Yao He; Xianrui Yang; Chaoran Xue; Yiruo He; Mengyuan Zhao; Xianglong Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Vibration paradox in orthodontics: Anabolic and catabolic effects.

Authors:  Mani Alikhani; Sarah Alansari; Mohammad A Hamidaddin; Chinapa Sangsuwon; Bandar Alyami; Soumya N Thirumoorthy; Serafim M Oliveira; Jeanne M Nervina; Cristina C Teixeira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Differential Efficacy of 2 Vibrating Orthodontic Devices to Alter the Cellular Response in Osteoblasts, Fibroblasts, and Osteoclasts.

Authors:  Stefan Judex; Suphannee Pongkitwitoon
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Evaluating the Efficacy of a Modified Piezo-Puncture Method on the Rate of Tooth Movement in Orthodontic Patients: A Clinical Study.

Authors:  Maryam Omidkhoda; Mehrdad Radvar; Majid Azizi; Mahboobe Dehghani
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-03-01

9.  Effect of nicotine on orthodontic tooth movement and bone remodeling in rats.

Authors:  Sung-Hee Lee; Jung-Yul Cha; Sung-Hwan Choi; Baek-Il Kim; Jae-Kook Cha; Chung-Ju Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-07-25       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 10.  The effectiveness of vibrational stimulus to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dian Jing; Jiani Xiao; Xiaobing Li; Yu Li; Zhihe Zhao
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.