Literature DB >> 26321336

Esthetic evaluation of incisor inclination in smiling profiles with respect to mandibular position.

Hooman Zarif Najafi1, Morteza Oshagh2, Mohammad Hassan Khalili3, Sepideh Torkan4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The smile is a key facial expression, and a careful assessment of the facial profile in smiling is an essential part of a complete orthodontic diagnosis. The aim of this study was to determine the preferred maxillary incisor inclination in the smile profile with regard to different mandibular positions.
METHODS: A smiling profile photograph of a man with normal facial profile features was altered digitally to obtain 3 different mandibular sagittal positions in 4-mm decrements or increments from -4 to +4 mm. In each mandibular position, the inclination of the maxillary incisors was changed from -10° to +10° in 5° increments. A total of 234 raters (72 senior dental students, 24 orthodontists, 21 maxillofacial surgeons, 25 prosthodontists, and 92 laypeople) were asked to score each photograph using a Likert-type rating scale. Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and intraclass correlation coefficient tests were used to analyze the data.
RESULTS: In retruded and protruded mandibles, normal incisor inclination and the most retroclined incisors were selected as the most and the least attractive images, respectively, by almost all groups. With an orthognathic mandible, the image with the most retroclined incisors was selected as the least attractive, but the raters were not unanimous regarding the most attractive image. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.82 (high level of agreement). Also, the sex of the raters had no effect on the rating of the photographs.
CONCLUSIONS: It is crucial to establish a normal incisor inclination, especially in patients with a mandibular deficiency or excess. An excessive maxillary incisor lingual inclination should be avoided regardless of the mandibular position.
Copyright © 2015 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26321336     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  10 in total

1.  [Therapeutic effect analysis of skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion treatment by transmission straight wire technique].

Authors:  Feng Cheng; Zhi-Shan Jian; Ying Zhu; Chun-Yan Zhang; Li Hu; Li-Li Chen
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-01

2.  Change in crown inclination accompanying initial tooth alignment with round archwires.

Authors:  Mona A Montasser; Ludger Keilig; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2022-07-04

3.  Correlations between objective measurements and subjective evaluations of facial profile after orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Danqing He; Yan Gu; Yannan Sun
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Three-dimensional measurement of tooth inclination: A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Mahtab Nouri; Sahar Khaje Hosseini; Sohrab Asefi; Amir Hossein Abdi; Alireza Akbarzadeh Bagheban
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug

5.  Evaluation of aesthetic anteroposterior position of maxillary incisors in patients with extraction treatment using facial reference lines.

Authors:  Danqing He; Yan Gu; Yannan Sun
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  The relationship between dentofacial morphology and smile characteristics in lateral and oblique views.

Authors:  Johnson Hsin-Chung Cheng; Mingming Jareerat Luechapanichkul; Tracy Yi-Hsuan Lee
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.080

7.  A CBCT Evaluation of Esthetic Preference Regarding the Perceived Facial Attractiveness of Young Korean Female Adults with a Normal Skeletal Pattern.

Authors:  Jin-Hyoung Oh; Jae Hyun Park; Heon Jae Cho; Hye Young Seo; Jong-Moon Chae
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Effects of force magnitude on torque control in the correction of bimaxillary protrusion with mass retraction.

Authors:  Jiao Li; Yunhe Zhao; Houxuan Li; Huang Li; Lang Lei
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2018-06-06

9.  Proposed parameters of optimal central incisor positioning in orthodontic treatment planning: A systematic review.

Authors:  Linda Sangalli; Domenico Dalessandri; Stefano Bonetti; Gualtiero Mandelli; Luca Visconti; Fabio Savoldi
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Customized maxillary incisor position relative to dentoskeletal and soft tissue patterns in Chinese women: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Xueman Zhou; Yingcheng Zheng; Zhenzhen Zhang; Zihan Zhang; Lina Wu; Jiaqi Liu; Wenke Yang; Jun Wang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 1.372

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.