Literature DB >> 26321318

Riluzole in patients with hereditary cerebellar ataxia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Silvia Romano1, Giulia Coarelli1, Christian Marcotulli2, Luca Leonardi2, Francesca Piccolo2, Maria Spadaro3, Marina Frontali3, Michela Ferraldeschi1, Maria Chiara Vulpiani4, Federica Ponzelli1, Marco Salvetti5, Francesco Orzi1, Antonio Petrucci6, Nicola Vanacore7, Carlo Casali2, Giovanni Ristori8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our previous study in patients with cerebellar ataxias of different causes showed significant benefit of riluzole after 8 weeks. We aimed to confirm these results in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia or Friedreich's ataxia in a 1-year trial.
METHODS: Patients with spinocerebellar ataxia or Friedreich's ataxia (2:1 ratio) from three Italian neurogenetic units were enrolled in this multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, and randomly assigned to riluzole (50 mg orally, twice daily) or placebo for 12 months. The randomisation list was computer-generated and a centralised randomisation system was implemented. Participants and assessing neurologists were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with improved Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) score (a drop of at least one point) at 12 months. An intention-to-treat analysis was done. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01104649.
FINDINGS: Between May 22, 2010, and Feb 25, 2013, 60 patients were enrolled. Two patients in the riluzole group and three in the placebo group withdrew their consent before receiving treatment, so the intention-to-treat analysis was done on 55 patients (19 with spinocerebellar ataxia and nine with Friedreich's ataxia in the riluzole group, and 19 with spinocerebellar ataxia and eight with Friedreich's ataxia in the placebo group). The proportion with decreased SARA score was 14 (50%) of 28 patients in the riluzole group versus three (11%) of 27 in the placebo group (OR 8·00, 95% CI 1·95-32·83; p=0·002). No severe adverse events were recorded. In the riluzole group, two patients had an increase in liver enzymes (less than two times above normal limits). In two participants in the riluzole group and two participants in the placebo group, sporadic mild adverse events were reported.
INTERPRETATION: Our findings lend support to the idea that riluzole could be a treatment for cerebellar ataxia. Longer studies and disease-specific trials are needed to confirm whether these findings can be applied in clinical practice. FUNDING: Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26321318     DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00201-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN: 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


  61 in total

1.  Movement disorders: Repurposing riluzole to treat hereditary cerebellar ataxia.

Authors:  Heather Wood
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 2.  Emerging therapies in Friedreich's ataxia.

Authors:  Tanya V Aranca; Tracy M Jones; Jessica D Shaw; Joseph S Staffetti; Tetsuo Ashizawa; Sheng-Han Kuo; Brent L Fogel; George R Wilmot; Susan L Perlman; Chiadi U Onyike; Sarah H Ying; Theresa A Zesiewicz
Journal:  Neurodegener Dis Manag       Date:  2016

3.  Oculomotor deficits in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: Potential biomarkers of preclinical detection and disease progression.

Authors:  Chao Wu; Ding-Bang Chen; Li Feng; Xiang-Xue Zhou; Ji-Wei Zhang; Hua-Jing You; Xiu-Ling Liang; Zhong Pei; Xun-Hua Li
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 5.243

Review 4.  Ataxia.

Authors:  Sheng-Han Kuo
Journal:  Continuum (Minneap Minn)       Date:  2019-08

5.  Loss-of-function BK channel mutation causes impaired mitochondria and progressive cerebellar ataxia.

Authors:  Xiaofei Du; Joao L Carvalho-de-Souza; Cenfu Wei; Willy Carrasquel-Ursulaez; Yenisleidy Lorenzo; Naileth Gonzalez; Tomoya Kubota; Julia Staisch; Timothy Hain; Natalie Petrossian; Michael Xu; Ramon Latorre; Francisco Bezanilla; Christopher M Gomez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Spinocerebellar ataxias: prospects and challenges for therapy development.

Authors:  Tetsuo Ashizawa; Gülin Öz; Henry L Paulson
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 7.  Ion channel dysfunction in cerebellar ataxia.

Authors:  David D Bushart; Vikram G Shakkottai
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 8.  Current concepts in the treatment of hereditary ataxias.

Authors:  Pedro Braga Neto; José Luiz Pedroso; Sheng-Han Kuo; C França Marcondes Junior; Hélio Afonso Ghizoni Teive; Orlando Graziani Povoas Barsottini
Journal:  Arq Neuropsiquiatr       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.420

Review 9.  The physiological basis of therapies for cerebellar ataxias.

Authors:  Hiroshi Mitoma; Mario Manto
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 6.570

10.  Investigating the Clinical Significance and Research Discrepancies of Balance Training in Degenerative Cerebellar Disease: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Scott Barbuto; Sheng-Han Kuo; Joel Stein
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.