Oliver S Grosser1, Gerhard Ulrich2, Christian Furth2, Maciej Pech3, Jens Ricke2, Holger Amthauer2, Juri Ruf4. 1. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany. Electronic address: oliver.grosser@med.ovgu.de. 2. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany. 3. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany; 2(nd) Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland. 4. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the influence of the parameters of the body surface area (BSA) method in hepatic radioembolization using yttrium-90-labeled microspheres on the determination of the prescribed activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 283 consecutive patients treated with radioembolization (BSA method) were included. For interindividual comparisons, activity concentrations (ACs; MBq/mL) were calculated for each liver. The impact of the BSA method parameters was assessed by analysis of variance and pairwise t test with Bonferroni-Holm correction. RESULTS: Prescribed activity was 1.01-2.71 GBq, with BSA, liver volume (LV), tumor burden, and the liver-lung shunt reduction factor (LLS RF) being significant contributing factors to the AC (all P < .0001, analysis of variance). BSA and LV correlated only moderately (ρ = 0.46, P < .0001). Compared with base activity defined by the BSA (median = 1.67 GBq; range, 1.20-2.32 GBq), the activity contribution of tumor burden was small (median = 150 MBq; range, 3-800 MBq). Resulting activities were reduced according to LLS RF by 20% in 12.4% and by 40% in 3.5% of patients. AC was significantly (up to 56%) lower in association with larger LV than in small LV (LV < 1,500 mL vs ≥ 2,500 mL, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In the BSA model, BSA and LV showed only a moderate correlation, resulting in a significantly lower AC in patients with larger livers. Tumor burden percentage contributed little to the prescribed activity because the BSA model did not account for actual LVs and tumor volumes. These inaccuracies may potentially result in underdosage in patients with larger livers, especially if further LLS RF needs to be applied.
PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the influence of the parameters of the body surface area (BSA) method in hepatic radioembolization using yttrium-90-labeled microspheres on the determination of the prescribed activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 283 consecutive patients treated with radioembolization (BSA method) were included. For interindividual comparisons, activity concentrations (ACs; MBq/mL) were calculated for each liver. The impact of the BSA method parameters was assessed by analysis of variance and pairwise t test with Bonferroni-Holm correction. RESULTS: Prescribed activity was 1.01-2.71 GBq, with BSA, liver volume (LV), tumor burden, and the liver-lung shunt reduction factor (LLS RF) being significant contributing factors to the AC (all P < .0001, analysis of variance). BSA and LV correlated only moderately (ρ = 0.46, P < .0001). Compared with base activity defined by the BSA (median = 1.67 GBq; range, 1.20-2.32 GBq), the activity contribution of tumor burden was small (median = 150 MBq; range, 3-800 MBq). Resulting activities were reduced according to LLS RF by 20% in 12.4% and by 40% in 3.5% of patients. AC was significantly (up to 56%) lower in association with larger LV than in small LV (LV < 1,500 mL vs ≥ 2,500 mL, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In the BSA model, BSA and LV showed only a moderate correlation, resulting in a significantly lower AC in patients with larger livers. Tumor burden percentage contributed little to the prescribed activity because the BSA model did not account for actual LVs and tumor volumes. These inaccuracies may potentially result in underdosage in patients with larger livers, especially if further LLS RF needs to be applied.
Authors: Linzi Arndt Webster; Alexander Villalobos; Bill S Majdalany; Zachary L Bercu; Ripal T Gandhi; Nima Kokabi Journal: Semin Intervent Radiol Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 1.780
Authors: Hugo Levillain; Oreste Bagni; Christophe M Deroose; Arnaud Dieudonné; Silvano Gnesin; Oliver S Grosser; S Cheenu Kappadath; Andrew Kennedy; Nima Kokabi; David M Liu; David C Madoff; Armeen Mahvash; Antonio Martinez de la Cuesta; David C E Ng; Philipp M Paprottka; Cinzia Pettinato; Macarena Rodríguez-Fraile; Riad Salem; Bruno Sangro; Lidia Strigari; Daniel Y Sze; Berlinda J de Wit van der Veen; Patrick Flamen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Hugo Levillain; Ivan Duran Derijckere; Lieveke Ameye; Thomas Guiot; Arthur Braat; Carsten Meyer; Bruno Vanderlinden; Nick Reynaert; Alain Hendlisz; Marnix Lam; Christophe M Deroose; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Patrick Flamen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-07-19 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Morsal Samim; Linde M van Veenendaal; Manon N G J A Braat; Andor F van den Hoven; Richard Van Hillegersberg; Bruno Sangro; Yung Hsiang Kao; Dave Liu; John D Louie; Daniel Y Sze; Steven C Rose; Daniel B Brown; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Edward Kim; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Marnix G E H Lam Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Hugo Levillain; Ivan Duran Derijckere; Gwennaëlle Marin; Thomas Guiot; Michaël Vouche; Nick Reynaert; Alain Hendlisz; Bruno Vanderlinden; Patrick Flamen Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2018-07-13 Impact factor: 3.138