Literature DB >> 26321010

Clinical trial spots for cancer patients by tumour type: The cancer trials portfolio at clinicaltrials.gov.

Vinay Prasad1, Jeffery A Goldstein2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although participation in cancer clinical trials is low, little is known about the number of available clinical trials, and open spots for patients. Moreover, it is unclear what the relationship is between clinical trial openings and the incidence and mortality of cancer subtypes.
METHODOLOGY: We identified the number of phase I, phase II and phase III registered at clinicaltrials.gov by cancer (tumour) type. All counts were over the preceding 5 years (2008-2013). We compared these counts against the incidence and prevalence of disease reported by Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database for 32 common cancers.
RESULTS: From 2008 to 2013, 3879 phase I trials, 4982 phase II trials and 1379 phase III trials concerning a cancer subtype were registered in clinicaltrials.gov. These trials had a cumulative proposed recruitment of 203,396, 421,502 and 697,787 patients, respectively. Trial enrollment varied by tumour type, with both over and under-representation occurring.
CONCLUSION: Opportunities to enroll in clinical trials vary by phase and tumour type. Oncologists must remain committed to clinical trials. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burden of disease; Cancer clinical trials; Cancer trials; Cancer trials portfolio; Clinicaltrials.gov; Phase I, phase II and phase III

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26321010      PMCID: PMC4663106          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  17 in total

1.  The relation between funding by the National Institutes of Health and the burden of disease.

Authors:  C P Gross; G F Anderson; N R Powe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-06-17       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Baseline event rate, the Concorde fallacy, and the topography of cardiac risk.

Authors:  Vinay Prasad
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 1.538

3.  Clinical trial registration: transparency is the watchword.

Authors:  Ida Sim; An-Wen Chan; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Tim Evans; Tikki Pang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-05-20       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Landscape of cancer clinical trials in Australia: using trial registries to guide future research.

Authors:  Rachel F Dear; Alexandra L Barratt; Kevin McGeechan; Lisa Askie; John Simes; Martin H N Tattersall
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 7.738

5.  Characteristics of clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007-2010.

Authors:  Robert M Califf; Deborah A Zarin; Judith M Kramer; Rachel E Sherman; Laura H Aberle; Asba Tasneem
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Decade in review-funding in cancer research: National Cancer Institute awards-a work in progress.

Authors:  Tito Fojo; Paraskevi Giannakakou
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Patient income level and cancer clinical trial participation.

Authors:  Joseph M Unger; Dawn L Hershman; Kathy S Albain; Carol M Moinpour; Judith A Petersen; Kenda Burg; John J Crowley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Julie R Brahmer; Scott S Tykodi; Laura Q M Chow; Wen-Jen Hwu; Suzanne L Topalian; Patrick Hwu; Charles G Drake; Luis H Camacho; John Kauh; Kunle Odunsi; Henry C Pitot; Omid Hamid; Shailender Bhatia; Renato Martins; Keith Eaton; Shuming Chen; Theresa M Salay; Suresh Alaparthy; Joseph F Grosso; Alan J Korman; Susan M Parker; Shruti Agrawal; Stacie M Goldberg; Drew M Pardoll; Ashok Gupta; Jon M Wigginton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities.

Authors:  Vivek H Murthy; Harlan M Krumholz; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Inadequate dissemination of phase I trials: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Evelyne Decullier; An-Wen Chan; François Chapuis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  3 in total

1.  Next steps to improve disparities in lung cancer treatment clinical trial enrollment.

Authors:  Leah L Zullig; William R Carpenter; Christina D Williams
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-03

Review 2.  Phase I trials as valid therapeutic options for patients with cancer.

Authors:  Jacob J Adashek; Patricia M LoRusso; David S Hong; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results.

Authors:  Rabia Bashir; Florence T Bourgeois; Adam G Dunn
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.