Joanne Shaw1, Rhonda Brown2, Stewart Dunn3. 1. Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney Australia. Electronic address: joanne.shaw@Sydney.edu.au. 2. Research School of Psychology, ANU College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, The Australian National University, Canberra Australia. 3. Pam McLean Centre, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between doctors' bad news delivery style and their experience of physiological stress during simulated bad news consultations. METHODS: 31 doctors participated in two simulated breaking bad news (BBN) consultations. Delivery style was categorized as either blunt, forecasting or stalling (i.e. avoidant), based on the time to deliver the bad news and qualitative analysis of the interaction content and doctor's language style. Doctors' heart rate (HR) and skin conductance (SC) were recorded in consecutive 30s epochs. RESULTS: Doctors experienced a significant decrease in HR (F(1,36)=44.9, p<.0001) and SC (F(1,48)=5.6, p<.001) between the pre- and post-news delivery phases of the consultation. Between-group comparisons for the three delivery styles did not identify any significant differences in HR (F(2,36)=2.2, p>.05) or SC (F(2,48)=.66, p>.05). CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Doctors experience heightened stress in the pre-news delivery phase of breaking bad news interactions. Delaying the delivery of bad news exposes doctors to a longer period of increased stress.This suggests that medical students and doctors should be taught to deliver bad news without delay, to help mitigate their response to this stressful encounter.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between doctors' bad news delivery style and their experience of physiological stress during simulated bad news consultations. METHODS: 31 doctors participated in two simulated breaking bad news (BBN) consultations. Delivery style was categorized as either blunt, forecasting or stalling (i.e. avoidant), based on the time to deliver the bad news and qualitative analysis of the interaction content and doctor's language style. Doctors' heart rate (HR) and skin conductance (SC) were recorded in consecutive 30s epochs. RESULTS: Doctors experienced a significant decrease in HR (F(1,36)=44.9, p<.0001) and SC (F(1,48)=5.6, p<.001) between the pre- and post-news delivery phases of the consultation. Between-group comparisons for the three delivery styles did not identify any significant differences in HR (F(2,36)=2.2, p>.05) or SC (F(2,48)=.66, p>.05). CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Doctors experience heightened stress in the pre-news delivery phase of breaking bad news interactions. Delaying the delivery of bad news exposes doctors to a longer period of increased stress.This suggests that medical students and doctors should be taught to deliver bad news without delay, to help mitigate their response to this stressful encounter.
Authors: M Nardelli; A Greco; O P Danzi; C Perlini; F Tedeschi; E P Scilingo; L Del Piccolo; G Valenza Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2018-07-14 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: José Atienza-Carrasco; Manuel Linares-Abad; María Padilla-Ruiz; Isabel María Morales-Gil Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2018-01-23 Impact factor: 3.223
Authors: Sonja Weilenmann; Ulrich Schnyder; Brian Parkinson; Claudio Corda; Roland von Känel; Monique C Pfaltz Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Sandra Kemp; Wendy Hu; Jo Bishop; Kirsty Forrest; Judith N Hudson; Ian Wilson; Andrew Teodorczuk; Gary D Rogers; Chris Roberts; Andy Wearn Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 2.463