Farhood Farjah1, David K Madtes2, Douglas E Wood3, David R Flum4, Megan E Zadworny4, Rachel Waworuntu5, Billanna Hwang5, Michael S Mulligan6. 1. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash; Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. Electronic address: ffarjah@uw.edu. 2. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Wash. 3. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. 4. Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. 5. Center for Lung Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. 6. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash; Center for Lung Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) C and D are biologically rational markers of nodal disease that could improve the accuracy of lung cancer staging. We hypothesized that these biomarkers would improve the ability of positron emission tomography (PET) to predict nodal disease among patients with suspected or confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A cross-sectional study (2010-2013) was performed of patients prospectively enrolled in a lung nodule biorepository, staged by computed tomography (CT) and PET, and who underwent pathologic nodal evaluation. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure biomarker levels in plasma from blood drawn before anesthesia. Likelihood ratio testing was used to compare the following logistic regression prediction models: ModelPET, ModelPET/VEGF-C, ModelPET/VEGF-D, and ModelPET/VEGF-C/VEGF-D. To account for 5 planned pairwise comparisons, P values <.01 were considered significant. RESULTS: Among 62 patients (median age, 67 years; 48% men; 87% white; and 84% NSCLC), 58% had fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in hilar and/or mediastinal lymph nodes. The prevalence of pathologically confirmed lymph node metastases was 40%. Comparisons of prediction models revealed the following: ModelPET/VEGF-C versus ModelPET (P = .0069), ModelPET/VEGF-D versus ModelPET (P = .1886), ModelPET/VEGF-C/VEGF-D versus ModelPET (P = .0146), ModelPET/VEGF-C/VEGF-D versus ModelPET/VEGF-C (P = .2818), and ModelPET/VEGF-C/VEGF-D versus ModelPET/VEGF-D (P = .0095). In ModelPET/VEGF-C, higher VEGF-C levels were associated with an increased risk of nodal disease (odds ratio, 2.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-6.90). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma levels of VEGF-C complemented the ability of PET to predict nodal disease among patients with suspected or confirmed NSCLC. VEGF-D did not improve prediction.
OBJECTIVE: Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) C and D are biologically rational markers of nodal disease that could improve the accuracy of lung cancer staging. We hypothesized that these biomarkers would improve the ability of positron emission tomography (PET) to predict nodal disease among patients with suspected or confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A cross-sectional study (2010-2013) was performed of patients prospectively enrolled in a lung nodule biorepository, staged by computed tomography (CT) and PET, and who underwent pathologic nodal evaluation. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure biomarker levels in plasma from blood drawn before anesthesia. Likelihood ratio testing was used to compare the following logistic regression prediction models: ModelPET, ModelPET/VEGF-C, ModelPET/VEGF-D, and ModelPET/VEGF-C/VEGF-D. To account for 5 planned pairwise comparisons, P values <.01 were considered significant. RESULTS: Among 62 patients (median age, 67 years; 48% men; 87% white; and 84% NSCLC), 58% had fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in hilar and/or mediastinal lymph nodes. The prevalence of pathologically confirmed lymph node metastases was 40%. Comparisons of prediction models revealed the following: ModelPET/VEGF-C versus ModelPET (P = .0069), ModelPET/VEGF-D versus ModelPET (P = .1886), ModelPET/VEGF-C/VEGF-D versus ModelPET (P = .0146), ModelPET/VEGF-C/VEGF-D versus ModelPET/VEGF-C (P = .2818), and ModelPET/VEGF-C/VEGF-D versus ModelPET/VEGF-D (P = .0095). In ModelPET/VEGF-C, higher VEGF-C levels were associated with an increased risk of nodal disease (odds ratio, 2.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-6.90). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma levels of VEGF-C complemented the ability of PET to predict nodal disease among patients with suspected or confirmed NSCLC. VEGF-D did not improve prediction.
Authors: Anthony Lemaire; Ivana Nikolic; Thomas Petersen; Jack C Haney; Eric M Toloza; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico; William R Burfeind Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: S J Mandriota; L Jussila; M Jeltsch; A Compagni; D Baetens; R Prevo; S Banerji; J Huarte; R Montesano; D G Jackson; L Orci; K Alitalo; G Christofori; M S Pepper Journal: EMBO J Date: 2001-02-15 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Rosalie C Viney; Michael J Boyer; Madeleine T King; Patricia M Kenny; Christine A Pollicino; Jocelyn M McLean; Brian C McCaughan; Michael J Fulham Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-06-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Donna E Maziak; Gail E Darling; Richard I Inculet; Karen Y Gulenchyn; Albert A Driedger; Yee C Ung; John D Miller; Chu-Shu Gu; Kathryn J Cline; William K Evans; Mark N Levine Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-07-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Shaun Daly; John C Kubasiak; Daniel Rinewalt; Ravi Pithadia; Sanjib Basu; Cristina Fhied; Gabriela C Lobato; Christopher W Seder; Edward Hong; William H Warren; Gary Chmielewski; Michael J Liptay; Philip Bonomi; Jeffrey A Borgia Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Francys C Verdial; David K Madtes; Billanna Hwang; Michael S Mulligan; Katherine Odem-Davis; Rachel Waworuntu; Douglas E Wood; Farhood Farjah Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Lucas W Thornblade; Douglas E Wood; Michael S Mulligan; Alexander S Farivar; Michal Hubka; Kimberly E Costas; Bahirathan Krishnadasan; Farhood Farjah Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Lucas W Thornblade; Michael S Mulligan; Katherine Odem-Davis; Billanna Hwang; Rachel L Waworuntu; Erika M Wolff; Larry Kessler; Douglas E Wood; Farhood Farjah Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Amelia Maiga; Farhood Farjah; Jeffrey Blume; Stephen Deppen; Valerie F Welty; Richard S D'Agostino; Graham A Colditz; Benjamin D Kozower; Eric L Grogan Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 4.330