Literature DB >> 26320776

Vascular endothelial growth factor C complements the ability of positron emission tomography to predict nodal disease in lung cancer.

Farhood Farjah1, David K Madtes2, Douglas E Wood3, David R Flum4, Megan E Zadworny4, Rachel Waworuntu5, Billanna Hwang5, Michael S Mulligan6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) C and D are biologically rational markers of nodal disease that could improve the accuracy of lung cancer staging. We hypothesized that these biomarkers would improve the ability of positron emission tomography (PET) to predict nodal disease among patients with suspected or confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS: A cross-sectional study (2010-2013) was performed of patients prospectively enrolled in a lung nodule biorepository, staged by computed tomography (CT) and PET, and who underwent pathologic nodal evaluation. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure biomarker levels in plasma from blood drawn before anesthesia. Likelihood ratio testing was used to compare the following logistic regression prediction models: ModelPET, ModelPET/VEGF-C, ModelPET/VEGF-D, and ModelPET/VEGF-C/VEGF-D. To account for 5 planned pairwise comparisons, P values <.01 were considered significant.
RESULTS: Among 62 patients (median age, 67 years; 48% men; 87% white; and 84% NSCLC), 58% had fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in hilar and/or mediastinal lymph nodes. The prevalence of pathologically confirmed lymph node metastases was 40%. Comparisons of prediction models revealed the following: ModelPET/VEGF-C versus ModelPET (P = .0069), ModelPET/VEGF-D versus ModelPET (P = .1886), ModelPET/VEGF-C/VEGF-D versus ModelPET (P = .0146), ModelPET/VEGF-C/VEGF-D versus ModelPET/VEGF-C (P = .2818), and ModelPET/VEGF-C/VEGF-D versus ModelPET/VEGF-D (P = .0095). In ModelPET/VEGF-C, higher VEGF-C levels were associated with an increased risk of nodal disease (odds ratio, 2.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-6.90).
CONCLUSIONS: Plasma levels of VEGF-C complemented the ability of PET to predict nodal disease among patients with suspected or confirmed NSCLC. VEGF-D did not improve prediction.
Copyright © 2015 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; diagnostic test; lung cancer; prediction models; risk prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26320776      PMCID: PMC4889434          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  30 in total

1.  Determinants of practice patterns and quality gaps in lung cancer staging and diagnosis.

Authors:  David E Ost; Jiangong Niu; Linda S Elting; Thomas A Buchholz; Sharon H Giordano
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Complication rate of endosonography (endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound): a systematic review.

Authors:  M B von Bartheld; A van Breda; J T Annema
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.580

3.  Neural networks for nodal staging of non-small cell lung cancer with FDG PET and CT: importance of combining uptake values and sizes of nodes and primary tumor.

Authors:  Lauren K Toney; Hubert J Vesselle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Nine-year single center experience with cervical mediastinoscopy: complications and false negative rate.

Authors:  Anthony Lemaire; Ivana Nikolic; Thomas Petersen; Jack C Haney; Eric M Toloza; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico; William R Burfeind
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Vascular endothelial growth factor-C-mediated lymphangiogenesis promotes tumour metastasis.

Authors:  S J Mandriota; L Jussila; M Jeltsch; A Compagni; D Baetens; R Prevo; S Banerji; J Huarte; R Montesano; D G Jackson; L Orci; K Alitalo; G Christofori; M S Pepper
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Randomized controlled trial of the role of positron emission tomography in the management of stage I and II non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Rosalie C Viney; Michael J Boyer; Madeleine T King; Patricia M Kenny; Christine A Pollicino; Jocelyn M McLean; Brian C McCaughan; Michael J Fulham
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Preoperative staging of lung cancer with combined PET-CT.

Authors:  Barbara Fischer; Ulrik Lassen; Jann Mortensen; Søren Larsen; Annika Loft; Anne Bertelsen; Jesper Ravn; Paul Clementsen; Asbjørn Høgholm; Klaus Larsen; Torben Rasmussen; Susanne Keiding; Asger Dirksen; Oke Gerke; Birgit Skov; Ida Steffensen; Hanne Hansen; Peter Vilmann; Grete Jacobsen; Vibeke Backer; Niels Maltbaek; Jesper Pedersen; Henrik Madsen; Henrik Nielsen; Liselotte Højgaard
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Correlation between lymph node metastasis and the expression of VEGF-C, VEGF-D and VEGFR-3 in T1 lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shinichi Maekawa; Akinori Iwasaki; Takayuki Shirakusa; Sotaro Enatsu; Takehito Kawakami; Motomu Kuroki; Masahide Kuroki
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.480

9.  Positron emission tomography in staging early lung cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Donna E Maziak; Gail E Darling; Richard I Inculet; Karen Y Gulenchyn; Albert A Driedger; Yee C Ung; John D Miller; Chu-Shu Gu; Kathryn J Cline; William K Evans; Mark N Levine
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Circulating angiogenesis biomarkers are associated with disease progression in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shaun Daly; John C Kubasiak; Daniel Rinewalt; Ravi Pithadia; Sanjib Basu; Cristina Fhied; Gabriela C Lobato; Christopher W Seder; Edward Hong; William H Warren; Gary Chmielewski; Michael J Liptay; Philip Bonomi; Jeffrey A Borgia
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  5 in total

1.  Prediction Model for Nodal Disease Among Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Francys C Verdial; David K Madtes; Billanna Hwang; Michael S Mulligan; Katherine Odem-Davis; Rachel Waworuntu; Douglas E Wood; Farhood Farjah
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  FGB and FGG derived from plasma exosomes as potential biomarkers to distinguish benign from malignant pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Muyu Kuang; Yizhou Peng; Xiaoting Tao; Zilang Zhou; Hengyu Mao; Lingdun Zhuge; Yihua Sun; Huibiao Zhang
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.984

3.  Variability in invasive mediastinal staging for lung cancer: A multicenter regional study.

Authors:  Lucas W Thornblade; Douglas E Wood; Michael S Mulligan; Alexander S Farivar; Michal Hubka; Kimberly E Costas; Bahirathan Krishnadasan; Farhood Farjah
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Challenges in Predicting Recurrence After Resection of Node-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Lucas W Thornblade; Michael S Mulligan; Katherine Odem-Davis; Billanna Hwang; Rachel L Waworuntu; Erika M Wolff; Larry Kessler; Douglas E Wood; Farhood Farjah
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Risk Prediction in Clinical Practice: A Practical Guide for Cardiothoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Amelia Maiga; Farhood Farjah; Jeffrey Blume; Stephen Deppen; Valerie F Welty; Richard S D'Agostino; Graham A Colditz; Benjamin D Kozower; Eric L Grogan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.330

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.