Literature DB >> 26320627

Right Parasternal Electrode Configuration Converts a Failed Electrocardiographic Screening to a Pass for Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation.

N Y Chan1, H C Yuen2, N S Mok2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pre-operative electrocardiographic (ECG) screening before subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (SICD) implantation is essential to prevent T-wave oversensing and inappropriate shocks. The failure rate of ECG screening was reported to be up to 8% when only two body positions were tested.
METHOD: Three subcutaneous ECG vectors represented by lead I, II and III were obtained in standing, supine, sitting and squatting positions. A patient qualified if the ECG in any same lead passed in all four positions. We report a 31-year-old man with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation who failed ECG screening for SICD implantation with the conventional left parasternal electrode (LPS) configuration in all three subcutaneous ECG vectors. Right parasternal electrode (RPS) configuration with left arm and right arm ECG electrodes positioned 1cm lateral to right sternal border was attempted for screening. RESULT: The amplitude of the QRS complex was significantly larger in the RPS compared to the LPS configuration in lead III and the patient passed the ECG screening in four body positions. He underwent successful SICD implantation with RPS approach with appropriate sensing both during the procedure and exercise treadmill test four weeks later. Ventricular fibrillation was successfully converted with 65J standard polarity shock during the procedure and no ICD shock was experienced by the patient on six-month follow-up.
CONCLUSION: RPS configuration may be considered in patients who fail the ECG screening with the conventional LPS approach for SICD implantation.
Copyright © 2015 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Right parasternal; Screening; Subcutaneous electrocardiography; Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Sudden cardiac death

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26320627     DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2015.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung Circ        ISSN: 1443-9506            Impact factor:   2.975


  4 in total

1.  Eligibility for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Linda Wang; Neeraj Javadekar; Ananya Rajagopalan; Nichole M Rogovoy; Kazi T Haq; Craig S Broberg; Larisa G Tereshchenko
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Analysis of Screening Electrocardiogram for the Subcutaneous Defibrillator in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Vincent C Thomas; Mark Peterson; Martin McDaniel; Humberto Restrepo; Abraham Rothman; Amit Jain
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Right versus left parasternal electrode position in the entirely subcutaneous ICD.

Authors:  Markus Bettin; Dirk Dechering; Gerrit Frommeyer; Robert Larbig; Andreas Löher; Florian Reinke; Julia Köbe; Lars Eckardt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Case report of an S-ICD implantation for secondary prevention in a patient with complex congenital heart disease, dextrocardia, and situs solitus.

Authors:  Felix Wiedmann; Raffaele De Simone; Peter Rose; Matthias Karck; Matthias Gorenflo; Norbert Frey; Constanze Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2022-06-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.