| Literature DB >> 26320242 |
S Herrmann1, S Recht2, M Boenn2, L Feldhahn2, O Angay3, F Fleischmann4, M T Tarkka5, T E E Grams6, F Buscot5.
Abstract
Common oak trees display endogenous rhythmic growth with alternating shoot and root flushes. To explore the mechanisms involved, microcuttings of theEntities:
Keywords: Ectomycorrhiza; Piloderma croceum; Quercus robur; RNASeq; growth cessation; stable isotope labelling.
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26320242 PMCID: PMC4765786 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erv408
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Fig. 1.Developmental stages of Quercus robur L. microcuttings. Developmental stages A (bud rest), B (bud swelling), C (shoot elongation), and D (leaf expansion) showing source leaves (SourceLeaf-1 and SourceLeaf-2) and sink leaves (SinkLeaf).
Fig. 2.Biomass and both 13C and 15N excess of oak plant fractions at the four developmental stages. Measurements performed for harvested plant fractions [SinkLeaf (light green), SourceLeaf-1 (med green), and SourceLeaf-2 (dark green), stem (ochre), principal roots (dark brown), and lateral roots (light brown)] at the four developmental stages (A, B, C, and D): DWs in (A) control and (B) Piloderma croceum-inoculated oak microcuttings; 13C excess levels of (C) control and (D) P. croceum-inoculated plants; and 15N excess levels of (E) control and (F) P. croceum-inoculated plants. Root to shoot ratios (R/SDW, R/S13C, and R/S15N) determined for plants at each of the four stages under each treatment are shown (means ±SE). Significant differences between stages are indicated with different letters for whole control plants (a, b), shoots (a’, b’), and roots (a’’, b’’) and, similarly, but in italics, for P. croceum-inoculated plants; Tukey test at P<0.05.
Results of the two-way ANOVA
Significance levels (P-values) for the main effects of developmental stage (stage), inoculation by Piloderma croceum, and their interaction (stage×P. croceum) on DW, 13C excess, and 15N excess, in the different fractions of Q. robur microcuttings.
| Stage |
| Stage× | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Total plant | *** | ** | NS |
| Total shoot | ** | * | NS |
| Total roots | *** | *** | NS |
| Sink leaves (SiLeaf) | *** | NS | NS |
| Source leaves (SoLeaf-1) | *** | * | (*) |
| Stem | * | *** | NS |
| Principal roots (PRS) | *** | ** | (*) |
| Lateral roots (LRS) | ** | *** | NS |
| R/SDW | NS | NS | NS |
|
| |||
| Total plant | *** | *** | NS |
| Total shoot | *** | *** | NS |
| Total roots | *** | *** | * |
| Sink leaves (SiLeaf) | *** | * | (*) |
| Source leaves (SoLeaf-1) | *** | ** | NS |
| Stem | * | *** | NS |
| Principal roots (PRs) | *** | *** | ** |
| Lateral roots (LRs) | *** | *** | (*) |
| R/S13C | *** | *** | (*) |
|
| |||
| Total plant | *** | (*) | NS |
| Total shoot | * | n.s. | (*) |
| Total roots | *** | (*) | NS |
| Sink leaves (SiLeaf) | ** | (*) | NS |
| Source leaves (SoLeaf-1) | *** | NS | NS |
| Stem | ** | (*) | NS |
| Principal roots (PRs) | *** | NS | NS |
| Lateral roots (LRs) | *** | (*) | NS |
| R/S15N | NS | NS | NS |
NS, non-significant; (*)P<0.05; *P<0.01; **P<0.001; ***P<0.0001.
Log2 ratios based on pairwise comparisons of C excess, N excess, and soluble sugar and starch contents in leaves (Leaf) and lateral roots (LRs) between successive developmental stages A (bud rest), B (bud swelling), C (shoot elongation), and D (leaf expansion) of control (Cont) and P. croceum-inoculated (Pi) oak microcuttings
Positive/negative log2 ratios indicate increasing/decreasing values between the initial and final stage of the pairwise comparison.
| Excess 13C | Excess 15N | Soluble sugar | Starch | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cont_Leaf | Cont_LR | Cont_ Leaf | Cont_LR | Cont_Leaf | Cont_LR | Cont_Leaf | Cont_LR | |||||||||
| DtoA | 0.18 | NS | 1.79 | ** | 0.40 | NS | 1.25 | NS | 1.85 | NS | 1.61 | * | 2.31 | NS | 3.72 | (*) |
| AtoB | –0.28 | NS | –0.24 | NS | 0.07 | NS | 0.36 | NS | 0.49 | NS | –0.65 | NS | 1.11 | * | 0.62 | NS |
| BtoC | –1.83 | * | –3.49 | *** | –2.44 | * | –2.22 | ** | 0.08 | NS | –2.54 | * | –2.35 | *** | –3.82 | *** |
| CtoD | 0.05 | NS | 1.95 | NS | –0.13 | NS | 0.61 | NS | –0.46 | NS | 1.58 | NS | –1.07 | NS | –0.53 | NS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| DtoA | –0.42 | NS | 1.64 | (*) | –1.24 | NS | 1.44 | (*) | 1.31 | * | 1.69 | * | 2.38 | NS | 3.95 | *** |
| AtoB | –0.63 | NS | 0.17 | NS | 0.02 | NS | 0.04 | NS | 0.24 | NS | –0.15 | NS | 0.68 | NS | 0.02 | NS |
| BtoC | –0.55 | NS | –1.45 | * | –1.41 | NS | –0.66 | NS | –0.19 | NS | –1.86 | * | –1.87 | * | –3.32 | ** |
| CtoD | –0.59 | NS | –0.36 | NS | –1.25 | NS | –0.82 | NS | –0.68 | NS | 0.32 | NS | –1.19 | NS | –0.64 | NS |
NS, non-significant; (*)P<0.05; *P<0.01; **P<0.001; ***P<0.0001.
Fig. 3.Venn diagrams based on up- and down-regulated contigs in leaves (Leaf) and lateral roots (LRs) within the Control (Cont) and P. croceum-inoculated (Pi) oak microcuttings. Differential expression of contigs was calculated in leaves (Leaf) by pairwise comparisons from stages D to A (DtoA) at shoot growth cessation and in LRs from stages B to C (BtoC) at root growth cessation. The blue ellipse marks 284 DECs in inoculated plants at leaf growth cessation, the yellow ellipse 1196 DECs in control plants at leaf growth cessation, and the red ellipse 1752 DECs of control plants during root growth cessation. Green colour indicates the ‘Leaf specific pool’ with DECs exclusively present at leaf growth cessation in control and inoculated plants, orange the ‘Cont specific pool’ with DECs exclusively present in control plants at shoot and root growth cessation, and beige the ‘Common pool’ with DECs belonging to control and inoculated plants at shoot and root growth cessation.
Fig. 4.Profiles of transcript abundance of selected differentially expressed contigs (DECs) within ‘Common pool’, ‘Cont specific pool’, and ‘Leaf specific pool’ resulting from the intersections Cont&Pi_Leaf and Cont_Leaf&LR at growth cessation: in the ‘Common pool’, DECs are common to LRs and leaves of controls and leaves of inoculated oak microcuttings; in the ‘Leaf specific pool’ DECs are common to control and inoculated leaves; and in the ‘Cont specific pool’ DECs are common to leaves and LRs of control plants. The transcript abundance is given for leaves (Leaf) and roots (LR) of control (Cont) and P. croceum-inoculated (Pi) plants at the four developmental stages A (bud rest), B (bud swelling), C (shoot elongation), and D (leaf expansion). Except for ‘si’ (indicating SinkLeaves), all leaves were SourceLeaf-1. Significant differential expression of transcripts between stages at P<0.01 is given in bold lines.
Selection of differential expressed contigs (DECs) (for a more extensive list see Supplementary Table S8 at JXB online) encoding genes with high log2 FC and/or high similarities (E-values) to A. thaliana genes (Blastx in TAIR) represented in the three pools resulting from the intersections Cont&Pi_Leaf and Cont_Leaf&LR at shoot growth cessation (SGC) in leaves (Leaf) and root growth cessation (RGC) in lateral roots (LRs) of control (Cont) and P. croceum inoculated (Pi) plants
In the ‘Common pool’ DECs are common to LRs and leaves of controls and leaves of inoculated oak microcuttings, in the ‘Leaf specific pool’ DECs are common to control and inoculated leaves, in the ‘Cont specific pool’ DECS are common to leaves and LRs of control plants. Log2 FCs of the Benjamin–Hochberg-adjusted P-values (P-adj<0.01) are given in bold (blue fields), for down-regulated genes and in italics (red fields) for up-regulated genes in the transition D to A (LeafDtoA) during SGC and in the transition B to C (LRBtoC) during RGC. Predicted functions originate from Blast2GO annotation of the OakContigDF159.1 reference library (Tarkka et al., 2013).
| Predicted functions | OakDF159 Contig name | Common pool | Cont specific pool | Leaf specific pool | Cont LeafDtoA | Cont LRBtoC | Pi LeafDtoA | Gene in | Alignment E-value | Encoded proteins in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||
| Endo-beta-glucanase | comp36907_c0_seq1 | x |
|
|
| AT1G70710 | 0.0 | GH9B1. CEL1. | ||
|
| comp41738_c0_seq1 | x |
|
|
| AT4G14080 | 1e-153 | MEE48 | ||
| beta-Glucanase | comp44202_c0_seq1 | x |
|
| AT3G07320 | 0.0 | GH17 | |||
| Glucan endo-beta-glucosidase | comp40819_c0_seq1 | x |
|
| AT5G42720 | 5e-73 | GH17 | |||
| Acid invertase | comp37785_c0_seq1 | x |
|
| AT1G12240 | 0.0 | ATBETAFRUCT4. V | |||
| Sucrose synthase sus1 | comp32110_c0_seq1 | x |
|
| AT5G20830 | 0.0 | SUS1. | |||
|
| comp36698_c0_seq1 | x |
|
| AT5G55180 | 1e-178 | GH17 | |||
| Nodulin 3 family protein | comp40679_c0_seq1 | x |
|
| AT5G23660 | 2e-47 | MTN3. SWEET12. | |||
|
| ||||||||||
| Ammonium transporter amt2 | comp38427_c0_seq1 | x |
|
| AT2G38290 | 0.0 | ATAMT2. AMT2;1. | |||
| Probable peptide nitrate transporter | comp43246_c1_seq1 | x |
|
| AT1G27080 | 7e-81 | NRT1.6 | |||
|
| ||||||||||
| Gibberellin-regulated protein | comp29599_c0_seq1 | x |
|
|
| AT5G15230 | 9e-32 | GASA4 | GAST1 | ||
| Gibberellin 20-oxidase | comp7575_c0_seq1 | x |
|
| AT5G51810 | 1e-44 | GA20OX2. | |||
|
| ||||||||||
| Auxin influx carrier component | comp38228_c2_seq1 | x |
|
| AT2G21050 | 0.0 | LAX2 | |||
| MtN21 nodulin family transporter | comp37627_c0_seq2 | x |
|
| AT3G53210 | 1e-100 | UMAMIT6 | |||
| Cytokinins | ||||||||||
| Purine permease | comp43663_c0_seq1 | x |
|
| AT1G28230 | 3e-68 | PUP1. ATPUP1 | |||
|
| ||||||||||
| Leucine-rich repeat receptor-like ki pxl2 | comp42644_c0_seq2 | x |
|
|
| AT5G61480 | 6e-95 | PXY | ||
| Leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase | comp39844_c0_seq2 | x |
|
|
| AT4G18640 | 1e-174 | MRH1 | ||
| Receptor protein kinase clavata1 | comp38911_c1_seq1 | x |
|
|
| AT1G75820 | 1e-172 | CLV1. FAS3. FLO5 | ||
| Leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase | comp42887_c1_seq1 | x |
|
|
| AT1G28440 | 0.0 | HSL1 | HAESA-like 1 | ||
| Cyclin a2 | comp41558_c0_seq1 | x |
|
|
| AT1G15570 | 1e-119 | CYCA2;3 | CYCLIN A2;3 | ||
| Cyclin d3 | comp36768_c4_seq1 | x |
|
|
| AT5G67260 | 5e-82 | CYCD3;2 | CYCLIN D3;2 | ||
|
| ||||||||||
| Gras family transcription factor | comp39403_c0_seq1 | x |
|
|
| AT1G63100 | 0.0 | GRAS TF | ||
| Platz transcription factor domain | comp43527_c1_seq3 | x |
|
|
| AT1G21000 | 3e-97 | PLATZ TF | ||
| Transcription factor bhlh62-like | comp34576_c0_seq1 | x |
|
| AT1G10120 | 6e-44 | CIB2 | |||
| Transcription factor myb48 | comp33951_c0_seq4 | x |
|
| AT3G46130 | 4e-53 | MYB48 | |||
| Wrky transcription | comp22770_c0_seq1 | x |
|
| AT5G13080 | 1e-41 | WRKY75. ATWRKY75. | |||
| Transcription factor bhlh63-like | comp29996_c0_seq2 | x |
|
| AT4G34530 | 9e-51 | CIB1 | |||
| Zinc finger | comp35351_c0_seq1 | x |
|
| AT5G33370 | 1e-145 | GDSL-like lipase | |||
|
| ||||||||||
| Quasimodo1-like protein | comp42130_c0_seq1 | x |
|
|
| AT3G25140 | 0.0 | GAUT8. QUA1. | ||
| Multidrug resistance | comp42525_c0_seq1 | x |
|
|
| AT5G65380 | 0.0 | MATE efflux family | ||
| Protein proliferation | comp39887_c0_seq1 | x |
|
|
| AT4G02060 | 0.0 | PRL. MCM7. | ||
| E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase xbat31-like | comp39201_c1_seq3 | x |
|
|
| AT2G28840 | 1e-154 | XBAT31 | XB3 orthologue 1 | ||
| Transducin wd-40 repeat-containing | comp43499_c0_seq2 | x |
|
| AT3G06880 | 1e-156 | Transducin/WD40 repeat | |||
| Sensitive to freezing 6 protein | comp42472_c0_seq4 | x |
|
| AT4G04920 | 0.0 | SFR6 | |||
| Transducin wd-40 repeat-containing | comp26403_c0_seq1 | x |
|
| AT3G06880 | 1e-40 | Transducin/WD40 repeat | |||
| Kelch repeat-containing f-box family | comp34217_c0_seq1 | x |
|
| AT1G23390 | 2e-79 | Kelch repeat-F-box | |||
| Ddb1- and cul4-associated factor | comp43378_c5_seq3 | x |
|
| AT4G31160 | 0.0 | DCAF1 | DDB1-CUL4 | |||
| Metal-nicotianamine transporter ysl1 | comp37162_c0_seq1 | x |
|
| AT4G24120 | 0.0 | YSL1. ATYSL1 | |||
| Nudix hydrolase 2-like | comp43278_c0_seq10 | x |
|
| AT4G12720 | 4e-89 | AtNUDT7. GFG1. | |||