Literature DB >> 26319968

Transfemoral vs Non-transfemoral Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Jaya Chandrasekhar1, Benjamin Hibbert1, Marc Ruel2, Buu-Khanh Lam3, Marino Labinaz1, Christopher Glover1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the definitive therapy for high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of non-transfemoral access on clinical outcomes in TAVI.
METHODS: We conducted a computerized literature search on SCOPUS and selected all studies published in the English language, from 2002 until March 12 2014, that compared transfemoral access with a non-transfemoral access cohort. Two independent reviewers evaluated the studies and extracted data for analysis.
RESULTS: A total 17,020 patients (11,079 transfemoral, 5941 non-transfemoral) encompassing 28 studies underwent TAVI between 2007 to 2013. Overall, the 30-day mortality was 4.7% with the transfemoral approach and 8.1% with a non-transfemoral approach (odds ratio [OR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-0.64; P < 0.01). The 1-year mortality was 16.4% with transfemoral access and 24.8% with non-transfemoral access (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.60-0.75; P < 0.01). Transfemoral access was associated with a greater incidence of vascular complications (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.48-2.99; P < 0.01) but a lower rate of surgical conversion (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42-0.81; P < 0.01) and similar bleeding (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.81-1.27; P = 0.91) compared with non-transfemoral access. The incidence of cerebrovascular events was similar in both groups (1.6% vs 2.1%; OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.64-1.15; P = 0.31).
CONCLUSIONS: Transfemoral access was associated with lower rate of 30-day and 1-year mortality compared with non-transfemoral access for TAVI. Randomized studies are needed to ascertain the effect of alternative access sites on clinical outcomes in prohibitive-risk, high-risk, and intermediate-risk populations, using currently available technologies.
Copyright © 2015 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26319968     DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  9 in total

Review 1.  Vascular approaches for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Isaac Pascual; Amelia Carro; Pablo Avanzas; Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Rocío Díaz; Jose Rozado; Rebeca Lorca; María Martín; Jacobo Silva; César Morís
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Simultaneous transfemoral valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement and debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair through a tortuous and shaggy aorta: a case report.

Authors:  Yoshito Kadoya; Kan Zen; Hitoshi Yaku; Satoaki Matoba
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2020-07-28

Review 3.  Transaxillary Versus Transaortic Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the Treatment of Aortic Stenosis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ishaque Hameed; Mohammad O Khan; Ibtehaj Ul-Haque; Omer M Siddiqui; Syed A Samad; Shanza Malik; Samar Mahmood
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-12

Review 4.  Should All Low-risk Patients Now Be Considered for TAVR? Operative Risk, Clinical, and Anatomic Considerations.

Authors:  Saima Siddique; Hemal Gada; Mubashir A Mumtaz; Amit N Vora
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Direct aortic route versus transaxillary route for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-An Lee; I-Li Su; Shao-Wei Chen; Victor Chien-Chia Wu; Dong-Yi Chen; Pao-Hsien Chu; An-Hsun Chou; Yu-Ting Cheng; Pyng-Jing Lin; Feng-Chun Tsai
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 6.  Moderate Aortic Stenosis and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Current Evidence and Challenges Ahead.

Authors:  Ernest Spitzer; Ben Ren; Herbert Kroon; Lennart van Gils; Olivier Manintveld; Joost Daemen; Felix Zijlstra; Peter P de Jaegere; Marcel L Geleijnse; Nicolas M Van Mieghem
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-08-17

7.  Clinical Arterial Peripheral Vascular Pathology Does Not Impact Short- or Long-Term Survival after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Brent Klinkhammer
Journal:  Int J Vasc Med       Date:  2018-07-17

Review 8.  Minireview: Transaortic Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Is There Still an Indication?

Authors:  Lukas Stastny; Christoph Krapf; Julia Dumfarth; Simone Gasser; Axel Bauer; Guy Friedrich; Bernhard Metzler; Gudrun Feuchtner; Agnes Mayr; Michael Grimm; Nikolaos Bonaros
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-04

9.  Comparison of outcomes of trans-subclavian versus trans-apical approaches in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Olaf Tomala; Vipin Zamvar; Rong Bing; Renzo Pessotto; Nick Cruden
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 1.522

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.