Literature DB >> 26319272

A Context-Aware Application to Increase Elderly Users Compliance with Physical Rehabilitation Exercises at Home via Animatronic Biofeedback.

Borja Gamecho1, Hugo Silva, José Guerreiro, Luis Gardeazabal, Julio Abascal.   

Abstract

Biofeedback from physical rehabilitation exercises has proved to lead to faster recovery, better outcomes, and increased patient motivation. In addition, it allows the physical rehabilitation processes carried out at the clinic to be complemented with exercises performed at home. However, currently existing approaches rely mostly on audio and visual reinforcement cues, usually presented to the user on a computer screen or a mobile phone interface. Some users, such as elderly people, can experience difficulties to use and understand these interfaces, leading to non-compliance with the rehabilitation exercises. To overcome this barrier, latest biosignal technologies can be used to enhance the efficacy of the biofeedback, decreasing the complexity of the user interface. In this paper we propose and validate a context-aware framework for the use of animatronic biofeedback, as a way of potentially increasing the compliance of elderly users with physical rehabilitation exercises performed at home. In the scope of our work, animatronic biofeedback entails the use of pre-programmed actions on a robot that are triggered in response to certain changes detected in the users biomechanical or electrophysiological signals. We use electromyographic and accelerometer signals, collected in real time, to monitor the performance of the user while executing the exercises, and a mobile robot to provide animatronic reinforcement cues associated with their correct or incorrect execution. A context-aware application running on a smartphone aggregates the sensor data and controls the animatronic feedback. The acceptability of the animatronic biofeedback has been tested on a set of volunteer elderly users, and results suggest that the participants found the animatronic feedback engaging and of added value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26319272     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-015-0296-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  12 in total

1.  The use of electromyogram biofeedback to reduce Trendelenburg gait.

Authors:  J S Petrofsky
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Design and evaluation of NEUROBike: a neurorehabilitative platform for bedridden post-stroke patients.

Authors:  Vito Monaco; Giuseppe Galardi; Martina Coscia; Dario Martelli; Silvestro Micera
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  BIT: Biosignal Igniter Toolkit.

Authors:  Hugo Plácido da Silva; André Lourenço; Ana Fred; Raúl Martins
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 4.  Physiotherapist-directed rehabilitation exercises in the outpatient or home setting improve strength, gait speed and cadence after elective total hip replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Corinne L Coulter; Jennie M Scarvell; Teresa M Neeman; Paul N Smith
Journal:  J Physiother       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.000

5.  Six-week gait retraining program reduces knee adduction moment, reduces pain, and improves function for individuals with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Pete B Shull; Amy Silder; Rebecca Shultz; Jason L Dragoo; Thor F Besier; Scott L Delp; Mark R Cutkosky
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  EMG-based visual-haptic biofeedback: a tool to improve motor control in children with primary dystonia.

Authors:  Claudia Casellato; Alessandra Pedrocchi; Giovanna Zorzi; Lea Vernisse; Giancarlo Ferrigno; Nardo Nardocci
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Design and control of RUPERT: a device for robotic upper extremity repetitive therapy.

Authors:  Thomas G Sugar; Jiping He; Edward J Koeneman; James B Koeneman; Richard Herman; H Huang; Robert S Schultz; D E Herring; J Wanberg; Sivakumar Balasubramanian; Pete Swenson; Jeffrey A Ward
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 8.  Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the effectiveness of biofeedback for pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  C E Koh; C J Young; J M Young; M J Solomon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  SQUID: sensorized shirt with smartphone interface for exercise monitoring and home rehabilitation.

Authors:  Amir B Farjadian; Mark L Sivak; Constantinos Mavroidis
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2013-06

Review 10.  Biofeedback in rehabilitation.

Authors:  Oonagh M Giggins; Ulrik McCarthy Persson; Brian Caulfield
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Simulators with Haptic Devices for Medical Training.

Authors:  David Escobar-Castillejos; Julieta Noguez; Luis Neri; Alejandra Magana; Bedrich Benes
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Feasibility of the Archercise biofeedback device to strengthen foot musculature.

Authors:  Penelope J Latey; John Eisenhuth; Marnee J McKay; Claire E Hiller; Premala Sureshkumar; Elizabeth J Nightingale; Joshua Burns
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Enabling Older Adults' Health Self-Management through Self-Report and Visualization-A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Gabriela Cajamarca; Valeria Herskovic; Pedro O Rossel
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.