INTRODUCTION: A high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been used to treat patients with dyspnea. We identified changes in arterial blood gas (ABG) of patients visiting the emergency department (ED) with hypercapnic and nonhypercapnic respiratory failure after use of an HFNC. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of patients with respiratory failure who visited the hospital and used an HFNC in the ED. The study period was July 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013. Patients with Paco2 greater than 45 mm Hg before the HFNC ABG analyses were included in the hypercapnia group; others comprised the nonhypercapnia group. Primary outcomes were the changes in ABG before and after use of an HFNC in the hypercapnia and nonhypercapnia groups. Progression to noninvasive or invasive ventilation and mortality rates were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were included after exclusion of 92 according to exclusion criteria. Eighty-one patients (hypercapnia group, 46, and nonhypercapnia group, 35) were included. Paco2 significantly decreased among all patients after use of HFNC (from 54.7±26.4 mm Hg to 51.3±25.8 mm Hg; P=.02), but the reduction was significant only in the hypercapnia group (from 73.2±20.0 to 67.2±23.4; P=.02). Progression to noninvasive or invasive ventilation and mortality rates were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an HFNC in patients with hypercapnia could show a significant trend of decrease in Paco2. Progression to noninvasive or invasive ventilation and mortality rates were similar in patients with and without hypercapnia.
INTRODUCTION: A high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been used to treat patients with dyspnea. We identified changes in arterial blood gas (ABG) of patients visiting the emergency department (ED) with hypercapnic and nonhypercapnic respiratory failure after use of an HFNC. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of patients with respiratory failure who visited the hospital and used an HFNC in the ED. The study period was July 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013. Patients with Paco2 greater than 45 mm Hg before the HFNC ABG analyses were included in the hypercapnia group; others comprised the nonhypercapnia group. Primary outcomes were the changes in ABG before and after use of an HFNC in the hypercapnia and nonhypercapnia groups. Progression to noninvasive or invasive ventilation and mortality rates were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were included after exclusion of 92 according to exclusion criteria. Eighty-one patients (hypercapnia group, 46, and nonhypercapnia group, 35) were included. Paco2 significantly decreased among all patients after use of HFNC (from 54.7±26.4 mm Hg to 51.3±25.8 mm Hg; P=.02), but the reduction was significant only in the hypercapnia group (from 73.2±20.0 to 67.2±23.4; P=.02). Progression to noninvasive or invasive ventilation and mortality rates were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an HFNC in patients with hypercapnia could show a significant trend of decrease in Paco2. Progression to noninvasive or invasive ventilation and mortality rates were similar in patients with and without hypercapnia.
Authors: Jens Bräunlich; Dominic Dellweg; Andreas Bastian; Stephan Budweiser; Winfried Randerath; Dora Triché; Martin Bachmann; Christian Kähler; Abdel Hakim Bayarassou; Irmhild Mäder; Jens Geiseler; Norbert Köhler; David Petroff; Hubert Wirtz Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2019-07-05
Authors: SooHyun Bae; Minkyu Han; Changyoung Kim; Hyeji Lee; Jong Joon Ahn; Jin Hyoung Kim; Byung Ju Kang Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2020-03-16 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Kemal Şener; Mustafa Çalış; Zikret Köseoğlu; Sezai Sarı; Mustafa Polat; Durdu Mehmet Üzücek; Sadiye Yolcu Journal: Anatol J Cardiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.596