Literature DB >> 26318759

Prevalence of sarcopenic obesity in Germany using established definitions: Baseline data of the FORMOsA study.

W Kemmler1,2, S von Stengel3, K Engelke3, C Sieber4, E Freiberger4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The prevalence of sarcopenic obesity in community-dwelling women 70 years and older according to established sarcopenia and obesity definitions averaged between 0 and 2.3 % and can thus be considered as relatively low. However, the converse argument that sarcopenic obesity was incompatible with an independent life cannot be confirmed.
INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of sarcopenic obesity (SO) in community-dwelling (CD) older females in Germany. The secondary aim was to assess whether these females really live independently and autonomously.
METHODS: A total of 1325 CD females 70 years and older living in the area of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany were assessed. Sarcopenia as defined by (a) the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in older people (EWGSOP) and (b) the International working group on Sarcopenia (IWGS) combined with obesity defined as (a) BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2) (NIH) or (b) body-fat ≥ 35 % (WHO) was determined. In participants with SO, Barthel Index, care level and social network were retrospectively evaluated via personal interview.
RESULTS: Based on anthropometric data, family, education and social status, lifestyle, number and distribution of diseases and medication, the present cohort is representative for the corresponding German population. Sarcopenia prevalence was 4.5 % according to EWGSOP and 3.3 % according to the IWGS criteria. Obesity prevalence in our cohort averaged 19.8 % (BMI, NIH) and 63.8 % (body fat, WHO). The overlap between both factors (i.e. SO) ranged from 0 % (EWGSOP + NIH criteria) to 2.3 % (EWGSOP + WHO criteria). Factors that may represent limited autonomy or independence were very rarely identified in this SO cohort.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of sarcopenic obesity in the CD (female) German population 70 years + is relatively low. With respect to our second research aim, the hypothesis that SO was incompatible with independent life was rejected. However, the latter finding should be addressed with more dedicated study designs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; Body fat; EWGSOP; IWGS; Sarcopenia obesity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26318759     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-015-3303-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  34 in total

1.  White paper: "walking speed: the sixth vital sign".

Authors:  Stacy Fritz; Michelle Lusardi
Journal:  J Geriatr Phys Ther       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.381

2.  Prevalence of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in Korean adults: the Korean sarcopenic obesity study.

Authors:  T N Kim; S J Yang; H J Yoo; K I Lim; H J Kang; W Song; J A Seo; S G Kim; N H Kim; S H Baik; D S Choi; K M Choi
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Walking speed in elderly outpatients depends on the assessment method.

Authors:  Jantsje H Pasma; Marjon Stijntjes; Shan Shan Ou; Gerard J Blauw; Carel G M Meskers; Andrea B Maier
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2014-12-06

Review 4.  Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard W Bohannon; A Williams Andrews
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.358

5.  Estimation of sarcopenia prevalence using various assessment tools.

Authors:  C Beaudart; J Y Reginster; J Slomian; F Buckinx; N Dardenne; A Quabron; C Slangen; S Gillain; J Petermans; O Bruyère
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.032

6.  Low relative skeletal muscle mass (sarcopenia) in older persons is associated with functional impairment and physical disability.

Authors:  Ian Janssen; Steven B Heymsfield; Robert Ross
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 7.  Sarcopenic obesity: definition, cause and consequences.

Authors:  Sari Stenholm; Tamara B Harris; Taina Rantanen; Marjolein Visser; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.294

8.  Sarcopenic obesity: prevalence and association with metabolic syndrome in the Korean Longitudinal Study on Health and Aging (KLoSHA).

Authors:  Soo Lim; Jung Hee Kim; Ji Won Yoon; Seon Mee Kang; Sung Hee Choi; Young Joo Park; Ki Woong Kim; Jae Young Lim; Kyong Soo Park; Hak Chul Jang
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Validity of segmental multiple-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate body composition of adults across a range of body mass indexes.

Authors:  Kimberly J Shafer; William A Siders; LuAnn K Johnson; Henry C Lukaski
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 4.008

Review 10.  Sarcopenic obesity: how do we treat it?

Authors:  Matthew F Bouchonville; Dennis T Villareal
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.243

View more
  16 in total

1.  The association between sarcopenia and functional outcomes among older patients with hip fracture undergoing in-hospital rehabilitation.

Authors:  F Landi; R Calvani; E Ortolani; S Salini; A M Martone; L Santoro; A Santoliquido; A Sisto; A Picca; E Marzetti
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: aetiology, epidemiology and treatment strategies.

Authors:  John A Batsis; Dennis T Villareal
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 3.  Frailty and exercise interventions : Evidence and barriers for exercise programs.

Authors:  E Freiberger; W Kemmler; M Siegrist; C Sieber
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 4.  Sarcopenic obesity: research advances in pathogenesis and diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  Wen-Qing Xie; Ge-Lei Xiao; Yi-Bin Fan; Miao He; Shan Lv; Yu-Sheng Li
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Prevalence of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in older German men using recognized definitions: high accordance but low overlap!

Authors:  W Kemmler; M Teschler; A Weißenfels; C Sieber; E Freiberger; S von Stengel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Sarcopenia is associated with disability status-results from the KORA-Age study.

Authors:  A Phillips; R Strobl; S Vogt; K-H Ladwig; B Thorand; E Grill
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Sarcopenic Obesity: Epidemiologic Evidence, Pathophysiology, and Therapeutic Perspectives.

Authors:  Chrysi Koliaki; Stavros Liatis; Maria Dalamaga; Alexander Kokkinos
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2019-12

8.  Impact of whole body electromyostimulation on cardiometabolic risk factors in older women with sarcopenic obesity: the randomized controlled FORMOsA-sarcopenic obesity study.

Authors:  Katharina Wittmann; Cornel Sieber; Simon von Stengel; Matthias Kohl; Ellen Freiberger; Franz Jakob; Michael Lell; Klaus Engelke; Wolfgang Kemmler
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Developing sarcopenia criteria and cutoffs for an older Caucasian cohort - a strictly biometrical approach.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kemmler; Simon von Stengel; Matthias Kohl
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 10.  Reference Values for Skeletal Muscle Mass - Current Concepts and Methodological Considerations.

Authors:  Carina O Walowski; Wiebke Braun; Michael J Maisch; Björn Jensen; Sven Peine; Kristina Norman; Manfred J Müller; Anja Bosy-Westphal
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.