Literature DB >> 26318568

Stent linker effect in a porcine coronary restenosis model.

Jun-Kyu Park1, Kyung Seob Lim2, In-Ho Bae2, Joung-Pyo Nam3, Jae Hwa Cho4, Changyong Choi3, Jae-Woon Nah3, Myung Ho Jeong5.   

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the mechanical effects of different stent linker designs on in-stent restenosis in porcine coronary arteries. We fabricated stents with an open-cell structure composed of nine main cells and three linker structures in model 1 (I-type), model 2 (S-types) and model 3 (U-types)) as well as Model 4, which is similar to a commercial bare metal stent design. The stent cells were 70 mm thick and wide, with a common symmetrical wave pattern. As the radial force increased, the number of main cells increased and the length of linker decreased. Radial force was higher in model 1, with a linear I-linker, than in models with S- or U-linkers. The flexibility measured by three-point bending showed a force of 1.09 N in model 1, 0.35 N in model 2, 0.19 N in model 3, and 0.31 N in model 4. The recoil results were similar in all models except model 4 and were related to the shape of the main cells. The foreshortening results were related to linker shape, with the lowest foreshortening observed in model 3 (U-linker). Restenosis areas in the porcine restenosis model 4 weeks after implantation were 35.4 ± 8.39% (model 1), 30.4 ± 7.56% (model 2), 40.6 ± 9.87% (model 3) and 45.1 ± 12.33% (model 4). In-stent restenosis rates measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) showed similar trends as percent area stenosis measured by micro-CT. Model 2, with optimized flexibility and radial force due to its S-linker, showed significantly reduced restenosis in the animal model compared to stents with different linker designs. These results suggest that the optimal stent structure has a minimum radial force for vascular support and maximum flexibility for vascular conformability. The importance of the effects of these differences in stent design and their potential relationship with restenosis remains to be determined.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary stent; Linker; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Restenosis; Stent design

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26318568     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  4 in total

1.  Wireless Miniature Magnetic Phase-Change Soft Actuators.

Authors:  Yichao Tang; Mingtong Li; Tianlu Wang; Xiaoguang Dong; Wenqi Hu; Metin Sitti
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 32.086

2.  Native extracellular matrix orientation determines multipotent vascular stem cell proliferation in response to cyclic uniaxial tensile strain and simulated stent indentation.

Authors:  P S Mathieu; E Fitzpatrick; M Di Luca; P A Cahill; C Lally
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2021-12-23

3.  Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel Polymer-free Everolimus-eluting Stent in a Mid-term Porcine Coronary Restenosis Model.

Authors:  Kyung Hoon Cho; Myung Ho Jeong; Dae Sung Park; Moonki Kim; JungHa Kim; Jun-Kyu Park; Xiongyi Han; Dae Young Hyun; Min Chul Kim; Doo Sun Sim; Young Joon Hong; Ju Han Kim; Youngkeun Ahn
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Determination of the Influence of Strut Connector on Stent Deployment.

Authors:  V Hashim; S L Resmi; P N Dileep
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 1.664

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.