Literature DB >> 26318548

Use of a contact force-sensing ablation catheter with advanced catheter location significantly reduces fluoroscopy time and radiation dose in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Geoffrey Lee1, Ross J Hunter2, Matthew J Lovell2, Malcom Finlay2, Waqas Ullah2, Victoria Baker2, Mehul B Dhinoja2, Simon Sporton2, Mark J Earley2, Richard J Schilling3.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 'real-world' impact of a novel contact force (CF)-sensing (SmartTouch™, Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) catheter coupled with an advanced catheter location (ACL) system on fluoroscopy time and fluoroscopy dose during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This was a retrospective observational cohort study of prospectively collected data of 1515 consecutive patients undergoing paroxysmal AF (PAF) and persistent AF (PerAF) ablation at a single institution between 2009 and 2014. Patients undergoing AF ablation with the SmartTouch catheter and the ACL system (SmartTouch group, n = 510) were compared with those undergoing AF ablation without this technology (control group, n = 1005). The primary outcomes were total fluoroscopy time (min) and fluoroscopy dose as measured by the dose-area product (mGy cm(2)). Secondary endpoints included total procedure time, total ablation time, and major cardiac complications (tamponade, pericardial effusion, and urgent cardiac surgery). The SmartTouch group had significantly lower fluoroscopy times (9.5 vs. 41 min, P < 0.001), radiation doses (1044 vs. 3571 mGy cm(2), P < 0.001), and shorter procedural time (195 vs. 240 min, P < 0.001) when compared with the control group. This was statistically significant for both PAF and PerAF ablations and for both de novo and redo AF procedures. After a learning curve, a median fluoroscopy time of 3.5 min (interquartile range 6) for all AF ablations was achieved. There was no difference in the rate of cardiac complications (∼ 1.5%).
CONCLUSION: SmartTouch™ CF-sensing catheter use with ACL™ during AF ablation significantly reduces fluoroscopy times by 77%, radiation dose by 71%, and procedural time by 19% but does not improve overall safety or the risk of cardiac complications. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ablation; Atrial fibrillation; Contact force; Fluoroscopy; Radiation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26318548     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euv186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  11 in total

1.  Fluoroscopy-free AF ablation using transesophageal echocardiography and electroanatomical mapping technology.

Authors:  Benjamin O'Brien; Damian C Balmforth; Ross J Hunter; Richard J Schilling
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  The Impact of Advances in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Devices on the Incidence and Prevention of Complications.

Authors:  Fehmi Keçe; Katja Zeppenfeld; Serge A Trines
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-08

3.  Feasibility of zero or near zero fluoroscopy during catheter ablation procedures.

Authors:  Laurent M Haegeli; Linda Stutz; Mohammed Mohsen; Thomas Wolber; Corinna Brunckhorst; Chol-Jun On; Firat Duru
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.737

4.  Impact of contact force technology on reducing the recurrence and major complications of atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xianhui Zhou; Wenkui Lv; Wenhui Zhang; Yuanzheng Ye; Yaodong Li; Qina Zhou; Qiang Xing; Jianghua Zhang; Yanmei Lu; Ling Zhang; Hongli Wang; Wen Qin; Baopeng Tang
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.596

5.  A decade of atrial fibrillation ablation : Shifts in patient characteristics and procedural outcomes.

Authors:  C Teunissen; N Clappers; R J Hassink; J F van der Heijden; F H Wittkampf; P Loh
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Reducing radiation exposure during atrial fibrillation ablation using lectures to promote awareness.

Authors:  Yosuke Miwa; Akiko Ueda; Michitsugu Komeda; Shinsuke Takeuchi; Mika Nagaoka; Yuichi Momose; Noriko Nonoguchi; Kyoko Hoshida; Mutsumi Enomoto; Ikuko Togashi; Akiko Maeda; Yo Hagiwara; Toshiaki Sato; Kyoko Soejima
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2019-06-24

7.  How to leverage local impedance to guide effective ablation strategy: A case series.

Authors:  Francesco Solimene; Francesco Maddaluno; Maurizio Malacrida; Giuseppe Stabile
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2020-11-07

8.  Low-fluoroscopy atrial fibrillation ablation with contact force and ultrasound technologies: a learning curve.

Authors:  Paul C Zei; Tina D Hunter; Larry M Gache; Gerri O'Riordan; Tina Baykaner; Chad R Brodt
Journal:  Pragmat Obs Res       Date:  2019-01-10

Review 9.  Catheter ablation for the management of atrial fibrillation: current technical perspectives.

Authors:  Kathryn Lauren Hong; Jazlyn Borges; Benedict Glover
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-05

10.  Fluoroless and contrast-free catheter ablation without a lead apron in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Takumi J Matsubara; Katsuhito Fujiu; Yu Shimizu; Tsukasa Oshima; Jun Matsuda; Hiroshi Matsunaga; Gaku Oguri; Eriko Hasumi; Toshiya Kojima; Issei Komuro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.