Literature DB >> 26318528

Solving the paradox between same-object advantage and different-object advantage.

Hui Chen1, Liqiang Huang2.   

Abstract

The same-object advantage (SOA) effect is usually cited as evidence for object-based attention. However, the different-object advantage (DOA) effect, which appears to be the opposite of the SOA effect, has also been reported by some researchers. The present study was designed to resolve this apparent inconsistency. As the SOA effect has been well documented, here we focus on exploring when and why the DOA effect occurs. With a series of four experiments, we manipulated the identicality between two targets and found the SOA effect when the targets were different but the DOA effect when they were identical. These results demonstrate that the presence of SOA vs. DOA effects can be critically determined by the identicality between targets. Moreover, Experiment 4 provides direct evidence for our hypothesis that the DOA effect arises from the benefit of placing two identical targets in distinct objects (e.g., rectangles) that can help the differentiation between targets.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Different-object advantage; Object-based attention; Same-object advantage; Token individuation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26318528     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  2 in total

1.  Location-Specific Orientation Set Is Independent of the Horizontal Benefit with or Without Object Boundaries.

Authors:  Zhe Chen; Ailsa Humphries; Kyle R Cave
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-14

2.  Excess success in articles on object-based attention.

Authors:  Gregory Francis; Evelina Thunell
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.199

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.