Literature DB >> 26318124

Efficient ligase 3-dependent microhomology-mediated end joining repair of DNA double-strand breaks in zebrafish embryos.

Mu-Dan He1, Feng-Hua Zhang1, Hua-Lin Wang1, Hou-Peng Wang2, Zuo-Yan Zhu2, Yong-Hua Sun3.   

Abstract

DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair is of considerable importance for genomic integrity. Homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) are considered as two major mechanistically distinct pathways involved in repairing DSBs. In recent years, another DSB repair pathway, namely, microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ), has received increasing attention. MMEJ is generally believed to utilize an alternative mechanism to repair DSBs when NHEJ and other mechanisms fail. In this study, we utilized zebrafish as an in vivo model to study DSB repair and demonstrated that efficient MMEJ repair occurred in the zebrafish genome when DSBs were induced using TALEN (transcription activator-like effector nuclease) or CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/Cas9 technologies. The wide existence of MMEJ repair events in zebrafish embryos was further demonstrated via the injection of several in vitro-designed exogenous MMEJ reporters. Interestingly, the inhibition of endogenous ligase 4 activity significantly increased MMEJ frequency, and the inhibition of ligase 3 activity severely decreased MMEJ activity. These results suggest that MMEJ in zebrafish is dependent on ligase 3 but independent of ligase 4. This study will enhance our understanding of the mechanisms of MMEJ in vivo and facilitate inducing desirable mutations via DSB-induced repair.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/Cas9; Double-strand breaks repair; Ligase 3; Ligase 4; Microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ); Transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26318124     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2015.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  10 in total

Review 1.  Zebrafish Genome Engineering Using the CRISPR-Cas9 System.

Authors:  Mingyu Li; Liyuan Zhao; Patrick S Page-McCaw; Wenbiao Chen
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Polq-Mediated End Joining Is Essential for Surviving DNA Double-Strand Breaks during Early Zebrafish Development.

Authors:  Summer B Thyme; Alexander F Schier
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 3.  In vivo genome editing thrives with diversified CRISPR technologies.

Authors:  Xun Ma; Avery Sum-Yu Wong; Hei-Yin Tam; Samuel Yung-Kin Tsui; Dittman Lai-Shun Chung; Bo Feng
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2018-03-18

4.  Expanding the CRISPR Toolbox with ErCas12a in Zebrafish and Human Cells.

Authors:  Wesley A Wierson; Brandon W Simone; Zachary WareJoncas; Carla Mann; Jordan M Welker; Bibekananda Kar; Michael J Emch; Iddo Friedberg; William A C Gendron; Michael A Barry; Karl J Clark; Drena L Dobbs; Maura A McGrail; Stephen C Ekker; Jeffrey J Essner
Journal:  CRISPR J       Date:  2019-11-19

5.  A simple method using CRISPR-Cas9 to knock-out genes in murine cancerous cell lines.

Authors:  Airi Ishibashi; Kotaro Saga; Yuuta Hisatomi; Yue Li; Yasufumi Kaneda; Keisuke Nimura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Genome Engineering with TALE and CRISPR Systems in Neuroscience.

Authors:  Han B Lee; Brynn N Sundberg; Ashley N Sigafoos; Karl J Clark
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Acute multi-sgRNA knockdown of KEOPS complex genes reproduces the microcephaly phenotype of the stable knockout zebrafish model.

Authors:  Tilman Jobst-Schwan; Johanna Magdalena Schmidt; Ronen Schneider; Charlotte A Hoogstraten; Jeremy F P Ullmann; David Schapiro; Amar J Majmundar; Amy Kolb; Kaitlyn Eddy; Shirlee Shril; Daniela A Braun; Annapurna Poduri; Friedhelm Hildebrandt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  CRISPR/Cas9 targeting events cause complex deletions and insertions at 17 sites in the mouse genome.

Authors:  Ha Youn Shin; Chaochen Wang; Hye Kyung Lee; Kyung Hyun Yoo; Xianke Zeng; Tyler Kuhns; Chul Min Yang; Teresa Mohr; Chengyu Liu; Lothar Hennighausen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Robust activation of microhomology-mediated end joining for precision gene editing applications.

Authors:  Hirotaka Ata; Thomas L Ekstrom; Gabriel Martínez-Gálvez; Carla M Mann; Alexey V Dvornikov; Kyle J Schaefbauer; Alvin C Ma; Drena Dobbs; Karl J Clark; Stephen C Ekker
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  The Zebrafish as an Emerging Model to Study DNA Damage in Aging, Cancer and Other Diseases.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Cayuela; Kathleen B M Claes; Miguel Godinho Ferreira; Catarina Martins Henriques; Fredericus van Eeden; Máté Varga; Jeroen Vierstraete; Maria Caterina Mione
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2019-01-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.