Albert K Feeny1, Mongkol Tadarati2, David E Freund3, Neil M Bressler4, Philippe Burlina5. 1. Applied Physics Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University, MD, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, MD, USA. 2. Retina Division, Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins University, MD, USA; Rajavithi Hospital, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand. 3. Applied Physics Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University, MD, USA. 4. Retina Division, Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins University, MD, USA. 5. Applied Physics Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University, MD, USA; Retina Division, Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins University, MD, USA; Department of Computer Science, The Johns Hopkins University, MD, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), left untreated, is the leading cause of vision loss in people older than 55. Severe central vision loss occurs in the advanced stage of the disease, characterized by either the in growth of choroidal neovascularization (CNV), termed the "wet" form, or by geographic atrophy (GA) of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) involving the center of the macula, termed the "dry" form. Tracking the change in GA area over time is important since it allows for the characterization of the effectiveness of GA treatments. Tracking GA evolution can be achieved by physicians performing manual delineation of GA area on retinal fundus images. However, manual GA delineation is time-consuming and subject to inter-and intra-observer variability. METHODS: We have developed a fully automated GA segmentation algorithm in color fundus images that uses a supervised machine learning approach employing a random forest classifier. This algorithm is developed and tested using a dataset of images from the NIH-sponsored Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS). GA segmentation output was compared against a manual delineation by a retina specialist. RESULTS: Using 143 color fundus images from 55 different patient eyes, our algorithm achieved PPV of 0.82±0.19, and NPV of 0:95±0.07. DISCUSSION: This is the first study, to our knowledge, applying machine learning methods to GA segmentation on color fundus images and using AREDS imagery for testing. These preliminary results show promising evidence that machine learning methods may have utility in automated characterization of GA from color fundus images.
BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), left untreated, is the leading cause of vision loss in people older than 55. Severe central vision loss occurs in the advanced stage of the disease, characterized by either the in growth of choroidal neovascularization (CNV), termed the "wet" form, or by geographic atrophy (GA) of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) involving the center of the macula, termed the "dry" form. Tracking the change in GA area over time is important since it allows for the characterization of the effectiveness of GA treatments. Tracking GA evolution can be achieved by physicians performing manual delineation of GA area on retinal fundus images. However, manual GA delineation is time-consuming and subject to inter-and intra-observer variability. METHODS: We have developed a fully automated GA segmentation algorithm in color fundus images that uses a supervised machine learning approach employing a random forest classifier. This algorithm is developed and tested using a dataset of images from the NIH-sponsored Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS). GA segmentation output was compared against a manual delineation by a retina specialist. RESULTS: Using 143 color fundus images from 55 different patient eyes, our algorithm achieved PPV of 0.82±0.19, and NPV of 0:95±0.07. DISCUSSION: This is the first study, to our knowledge, applying machine learning methods to GA segmentation on color fundus images and using AREDS imagery for testing. These preliminary results show promising evidence that machine learning methods may have utility in automated characterization of GA from color fundus images.
Authors: Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Christian K Brinkmann; Florian Alten; Philipp Herrmann; Nina K Stratmann; Arno P Göbel; Monika Fleckenstein; Martin Diller; Glenn J Jaffe; Frank G Holz Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Muthu Rama Krishnan Mookiah; U Rajendra Acharya; Joel E W Koh; Vinod Chandran; Chua Kuang Chua; Jen Hong Tan; Choo Min Lim; E Y K Ng; Kevin Noronha; Louis Tong; Augustinus Laude Journal: Comput Biol Med Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 4.589
Authors: Neil M Bressler; Tom S Chang; Ivan J Suñer; Jennifer T Fine; Chantal M Dolan; James Ward; Tsontcho Ianchulev Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2010-03-02 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Keven J Blinder; Shannon Bradley; Neil M Bressler; Susan B Bressler; Guy Donati; Yong Hao; Colin Ma; Ugo Menchini; Joan Miller; Michael J Potter; Constantin Pournaras; Al Reaves; Philip J Rosenfeld; H Andrew Strong; Michael Stur; Xiang Yao Su; Gianni Virgili Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Anne S Lindblad; Patricia C Lloyd; Traci E Clemons; Gary R Gensler; Frederick L Ferris; Michael L Klein; Jane R Armstrong Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2009-09
Authors: Bernhard Baumann; Erich Gotzinger; Michael Pircher; Harald Sattmann; Christopher Schuutze; Ferdinand Schlanitz; Christian Ahlers; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth; Christoph K Hitzenberger Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2010 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Philippe M Burlina; Neil Joshi; Michael Pekala; Katia D Pacheco; David E Freund; Neil M Bressler Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 7.389