| Literature DB >> 26317999 |
Haoyi Wu1, Sum Wai Chiang1, Cheng Yang1, Ziyin Lin2, Jingping Liu1, Kyoung-Sik Moon2, Feiyu Kang3, Bo Li1, Ching Ping Wong4.
Abstract
Electrically small antennas (ESAs) are becoming one of the key components in the compact wireless devices for telecommunications, defence, and aerospace systems, especially for the spherical one whose geometric layout is more closely approaching Chu's limit, thus yielding significant bandwidth improvements relative to the linear and planar counterparts. Yet broad applications of the volumetric ESAs are still hindered since the low cost fabrication has remained a tremendous challenge. Here we report a state-of-the-art technology to transfer electrically conductive composites (ECCs) from a planar mould to a volumetric thermoplastic substrate by using pad-printing technology without pattern distortion, benefit from the excellent properties of the ECCs as well as the printing-calibration method that we developed. The antenna samples prepared in this way meet the stringent requirement of an ESA (ka is as low as 0.32 and the antenna efficiency is as high as 57%), suggesting that volumetric electronic components i.e. the antennas can be produced in such a simple, green, and cost-effective way. This work can be of interest for the development of studies on green and high performance wireless communication devices.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26317999 PMCID: PMC4552618 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136939
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1(a) A schematic illustration of the pad-printing process for the ESAs with a spherical helix shape. (b) A photographic image which shows the cliché, the pad, the PMMA substrate and the printed ESA. (c) A photograph of a double helix ESA and a coin.
Fig 2(a) A virtual image of the helix antennas. (b) Photograph of the helix antennas fabricated by pad-printing. (c) Return loss of the helix antennas. (d)~(f) Normalized radiation patterns for ESA samples 1, 2 and 3 (black line: x-z plane, red line: x-y plane).
Performance of the antenna fabricated by various methods.
| Samples |
| Center frequency (GHz) | Bandwidth (%) | Efficiency (%) |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECC pad-printing (this work) | ESA-1 | 0.35 | 1.38 | 13.1 | 51 | 15.3 | 1.2 |
| ESA-2 | 0.32 | 1.28 | 7.1 | 57 | 28.2 | 1.5 | |
| ESA-2R | 0.32 | 1.28 | 5.7 | 62 | 35.1 | 1.7 | |
| ESA-3 | 0.43 | 1.71 | 23.1 | 55 | 8.7 | 1.1 | |
| Silver ink printing [ | — | 0.46 | 1.70 | 15.2 | 71 | 13.1 | 1.5 |
| — | 0.21 | 0.79 | 6.3 | 14 | 31.9 | 2.0 | |
| Direct transfer printing [ | — | 0.23 | 1.12 | 2.0 | 52 | — | 2.1 |
| — | 0.31 | 1.52 | 5.3 | 69 | — | 1.8 | |
| Liquid alloy inflating [ | — | 0.22 | 0.426 | 1.9 | 55 | 53 | 1.0 |
| Holographic photolithography [ | — | 0.43 | 2.06 | 13.6 | 46 | 14.7 | 2.15 |
* ESA-2R: Sample ESA-2 after the 1000 hours-reliability test.
Fig 3Return loss of ESA-2 before and after the reliability test (85°C/85%RH for 1000 hours).
Standardized life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) results of a bottle cap and an pad-printed antenna.
(The dimensionless numbers are the ratio of the emission equivalent weight to reference value.)
| Impact Category | Bottle Cap | ESA |
|---|---|---|
| GWP (Global Warming Potential) | 1.45 × 10−12 | 3.34 × 10−12 |
| POCP (Photochem. Ozone Creation Potentia) | 1.26 × 10−12 | 3.74 × 10−12 |