Literature DB >> 26317538

A Four-Plex Real-Time PCR Assay, Based on rfbE, stx1, stx2, and eae Genes, for the Detection and Quantification of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli O157 in Cattle Feces.

Lance W Noll1, Pragathi B Shridhar1, Xiaorong Shi1, Baoyan An2, Natalia Cernicchiaro1, David G Renter1, Tiruvoor G Nagaraja1, Jianfa Bai2.   

Abstract

Several real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays have been developed to detect and quantify Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O157:H7, but none have targeted the O-antigen specific gene (rfbEO157) in combination with the three major virulence genes, stx1, stx2, and eae. Our objectives were to develop and validate a four-plex, quantitative PCR (mqPCR) assay targeting rfbE(O157), stx1, stx2, and eae for the detection and quantification of STEC O157 in cattle feces, and compare the applicability of the assay to detect STEC O157 to a culture method and conventional PCR (cPCR) targeting the same four genes. Specificity of the mqPCR assay to differentially detect the four genes was confirmed with strains of O157 and non-O157 STEC with different profiles of target genes. In cattle feces spiked with pure cultures, detection limits were 2.8×10(4) and 2.8×10(0) colony-forming units/g before and after enrichment, respectively. Detection of STEC O157 in feedlot cattle fecal samples (n=278) was compared between mqPCR, cPCR, and a culture method. The mqPCR detected 48.9% (136/278) of samples as positive for E. coli O157. Of the 100 samples that were randomly picked from 136 mqPCR-positive samples, 35 and 48 tested positive by cPCR and culture method, respectively. Of the 100 samples randomly chosen from 142 mqPCR-negative samples, all were negative by cPCR, but 21 samples tested positive by the culture method. McNemar's chi-square tests indicated significant disagreement between the proportions of positive samples detected by the three methods. In conclusion, the mqPCR assay that targets four genes is a novel and more sensitive method than the cPCR or culture method to detect STEC O157 in cattle feces. However, the use of real-time PCR as a screening method to identify positive samples and then subjecting only positive samples to a culture method may underestimate the presence of STEC O157 in fecal samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26317538     DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2015.1951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis        ISSN: 1535-3141            Impact factor:   3.171


  9 in total

1.  Development of multiplex TaqMan qPCR for simultaneous detection and differentiation of eight common swine viral and bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Feng Yang; Jie Gao; Weimin Zhang; Xingang Xu
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 2.476

2.  Single-Cell-Based Digital PCR Detection and Association of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Serogroups and Major Virulence Genes.

Authors:  Xuming Liu; Lance Noll; Xiaorong Shi; Elizabeth Porter; Yin Wang; Colin Stoy; Nanyan Lu; T G Nagaraja; Gary Anderson; Jianfa Bai
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Development of 11-Plex MOL-PCR Assay for the Rapid Screening of Samples for Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Travis A Woods; Heather M Mendez; Sandy Ortega; Xiaorong Shi; David Marx; Jianfa Bai; Rodney A Moxley; T G Nagaraja; Steven W Graves; Alina Deshpande
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.293

4.  Occurrence and quantification of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli from food matrices.

Authors:  C Sethulekshmi; C Latha; C J Anu
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2018-02-03

5.  Prevalence and concentration of stx+ E. coli and E. coli O157 in bovine manure from Florida farms.

Authors:  Christopher A Baker; Jaysankar De; Bruna Bertoldi; Laurel Dunn; Travis Chapin; Michele Jay-Russell; Michelle D Danyluk; Keith R Schneider
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Identification, Shiga toxin subtypes and prevalence of minor serogroups of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in feedlot cattle feces.

Authors:  Kaylen M Capps; Justin B Ludwig; Pragathi B Shridhar; Xiaorong Shi; Elisabeth Roberts; Chitrita DebRoy; Natalia Cernicchiaro; Randall K Phebus; Jianfa Bai; T G Nagaraja
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Comparison of Droplet Digital PCR and qPCR for the Quantification of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Bovine Feces.

Authors:  Bavo Verhaegen; Koen De Reu; Lieven De Zutter; Karen Verstraete; Marc Heyndrickx; Els Van Coillie
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.546

8.  Multiplex PCR Assays for the Detection of One Hundred and Thirty Seven Serogroups of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Associated With Cattle.

Authors:  Justin B Ludwig; Xiaorong Shi; Pragathi B Shridhar; Elisabeth L Roberts; Chitrita DebRoy; Randy K Phebus; Jianfa Bai; T G Nagaraja
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.293

9.  A multiplex real-time PCR panel assay for simultaneous detection and differentiation of 12 common swine viruses.

Authors:  Xiju Shi; Xuming Liu; Qin Wang; Amaresh Das; Guiping Ma; Lu Xu; Qing Sun; Lalitha Peddireddi; Wei Jia; Yanhua Liu; Gary Anderson; Jianfa Bai; Jishu Shi
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.014

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.