| Literature DB >> 26317414 |
Libao Deng1, Qingzhi Liang2, Xinhua He3, Cong Luo4, Hu Chen4, Zhenshi Qin5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Knowledge about genetic diversity and relationships among germplasms could be an invaluable aid in diospyros improvement strategies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26317414 PMCID: PMC4552666 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136510
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The localities of the natural D. kaki var. silvestris Mak samples.
Diospyros germplasm resources and their respective localities.
| NO. | Germplasms | Species | Localities | NO. | Germplasms | Species | Localities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yueshi |
| Gongcheng county | 49 | PL1 |
| Pingle county |
| 2 | Niuxinshi |
| Pingle county | 50 | PL2 |
| Pingle county |
| 3 | Jixinshi |
| Longlin county | 51 | JC1 |
| Jinchengjiang district |
| 4 | Xiaofangshi |
| Leye county | 52 | JC2 |
| Jinchengjiang district |
| 5 | Dafangshi |
| Leye county | 53 | YZ1 |
| Yizhou city |
| 6 | Huoshi |
| Gongcheng county | 54 | YZ2 |
| Yizhou city |
| 7 | Jingshi |
| Hengxian county | 55 | YZ3 |
| Yizhou city |
| 8 | HZ |
| Zhongshan county | 56 | YZ4 |
| Yizhou city |
| 9 | LQ1 |
| Liangqing district | 57 | YZ5 |
| Yizhou city |
| 10 | LQ2 |
| Liangqing district | 58 | YZ6 |
| Yizhou city |
| 11 | LL1 |
| Longlin county | 59 | YZ7 |
| Yizhou city |
| 12 | LL2 |
| Longlin county | 60 | YZ8 |
| Yizhou city |
| 13 | LL3 |
| Longlin county | 61 | YZ9 |
| Yizhou city |
| 14 | LL4 |
| Longlin county | 62 | YZ10 |
| Yizhou city |
| 15 | LY1 |
| Leye county | 63 | YZ11 |
| Yizhou city |
| 16 | LY2 |
| Leye county | 64 | YZ12 |
| Yizhou city |
| 17 | LY3 |
| Leye county | 65 | YZ13 |
| Yizhou city |
| 18 | LY4 |
| Leye county | 66 | QZ1 |
| Quanzhou county |
| 19 | LY5 |
| Leye county | 67 | QZ2 |
| Quanzhou county |
| 20 | LY6 |
| Leye county | 68 | QZ3 |
| Quanzhou county |
| 21 | LY7 |
| Leye county | 69 | QZ4 |
| Quanzhou county |
| 22 | LY8 |
| Leye county | 70 | QZ5 |
| Quanzhou county |
| 23 | GN1 |
| Gangnan district | 71 | QZ6 |
| Quanzhou county |
| 24 | GN2 |
| Gangnan district | 72 | QZ7 |
| Quanzhou county |
| 25 | GN3 |
| Gangnan district | 73 | QZ8 |
| Quanzhou county |
| 26 | GN4 |
| Gangnan district | 74 | QZ9 |
| Quanzhou county |
| 27 | GN5 |
| Gangnan district | 75 | QZ10 |
| Quanzhou county |
| 28 | GB1 |
| Gangbei district | 76 | XL1 |
| Xilin county |
| 29 | GB2 |
| Gangbei district | 77 | XL2 |
| Xilin county |
| 30 | GB3 |
| Gangbei district | 78 | XL3 |
| Xilin county |
| 31 | GB4 |
| Gangbei district | 79 | XL4 |
| Xilin county |
| 32 | GB5 |
| Gangbei district | 80 | XL5 |
| Xilin county |
| 33 | GB6 |
| Gangbei district | 81 | XL6 |
| Xilin county |
| 34 | GB7 |
| Gangbei district | 82 | XL7 |
| Xilin county |
| 35 | GB8 |
| Gangbei district | 83 | XL8 |
| Xilin county |
| 36 | GB9 |
| Gangbei district | 84 | XL9 |
| Xilin county |
| 37 | GB10 |
| Gangbei district | 85 | XL10 |
| Xilin county |
| 38 | GB11 |
| Gangbei district | 86 | TL1 |
| Tianilin county |
| 39 | GB12 |
| Gangbei district | 87 | TL2 |
| Tianilin county |
| 40 | QB1 |
| Qinbei district | 88 | TL3 |
| Tianilin county |
| 41 | QB2 |
| Qinbei district | 89 | WX |
| Laibin county |
| 42 | QB3 |
| Qinbei district | 90 | Yeshi1 |
| Pingle county |
| 43 | QB4 |
| Qinbei district | 91 | Yeshi2 |
| Pingle county |
| 44 | QB5 |
| Qinbei district | 92 | Yeshi3 |
| Leye county |
| 45 | QB6 |
| Qinbei district | 93 | Yeshi4 |
| Tianlin county |
| 46 | GC1 |
| Gongcheng county | 94 | Yeshi5 |
| Quanzhou county |
| 47 | GC2 |
| Gongcheng county | 95 | Junqianzi |
| Gongcheng county |
| 48 | GC3 |
| Gongcheng county |
Note: The germplasms that have not been previously reported, or whose names are not sure were temporarily named after the first letter of their localities and numbers.
Fig 2UPGMA dendrogram of the accessions of 95 diospyros germplasms based on SCoT molecular markers.
Fig 3UPGMA dendrogram of the accessions of 95 diospyros germplasms based on SSR molecular markers.
Results of analysis of the genetic diversity of the 12 natural D. kaki var. silverstris Mak. populations.
| Population | size | Observed number of allele/Na | Effective number of allele/Ne | Shannon’s information index/Ho | Nei’s gene diversity/He | Percentage of polymorphic loci (PPL)/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LL | 16.000 | 1.528 | 1.224 | 0.239 | 0.146 | 64.15 |
| XL | 15.000 | 1.226 | 1.247 | 0.233 | 0.150 | 53.46 |
| TL | 19.000 | 1.415 | 1.258 | 0.247 | 0.157 | 62.89 |
| YJ | 15.000 | 1.239 | 1.199 | 0.192 | 0.122 | 48.43 |
| QZ | 14.000 | 1.201 | 1.278 | 0.240 | 0.160 | 49.69 |
| HJ | 16.000 | 1.170 | 1.218 | 0.196 | 0.128 | 45.28 |
| ZS | 14.000 | 1.321 | 1.307 | 0.269 | 0.178 | 57.23 |
| LZ | 16.000 | 1.277 | 1.272 | 0.245 | 0.160 | 57.23 |
| WX | 15.000 | 1.164 | 1.224 | 0.201 | 0.131 | 48.43 |
| QT | 18.000 | 1.289 | 1.232 | 0.222 | 0.142 | 54.09 |
| LQ | 16.000 | 1.333 | 1.249 | 0.232 | 0.149 | 57.86 |
| LY | 15.000 | 1.434 | 1.260 | 0.257 | 0.162 | 63.52 |
| mean | 15.750 | 1.300 | 1.247 | 0.231 | 0.149 | 55.19 |
| total | 189.000 | 1.975 | 1.424 | 0.417 | 0.266 | 97.48 |
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) within and among natural D. kaki var. silvestris Mak. populations.
| Source of variance | d.f | SSD | MSD | Variance component | Percentage(%) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among populations (AP) | 11 | 2198.555 | 199.869 | 11.814 | 45.88 | < 0.001 |
| Within populations (WP) | 177 | 2466.979 | 13.938 | 13.938 | 54.12 | < 0.001 |
| Total | 188 | 4665.534 |
Note: MSD,expected mean squares
*Number of permutation = 1,000
Fig 4UPGMA dendrogram of the natural D. kaki var. silvestris Mak populations based on Nei’s genetic distance.