Literature DB >> 26317385

Length but not transverse diameter of the excision specimen for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2-3) is a predictor of pregnancy outcome.

Carlo A Liverani1, Jacopo Di Giuseppe, Nicolò Clemente, Giovanni Delli Carpini, Ermelinda Monti, Fabiana Fanetti, Giorgio Bolis, Andrea Ciavattini.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of cone characteristics (depth, transverse diameter, and volume) on subsequent pregnancies after the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2-3). Pregnancy outcomes (preterm birth, gestational age at birth, mode of delivery, and birth weight) of 501 women with singleton gestations and no previous preterm birth or history of late miscarriage, who had previously undergone a single LEEP for CIN 2-3, were retrospectively analyzed with respect to length, transverse diameter, and volume of the excision specimen. The overall incidence of preterm birth was 2.4%. The rate of preterm birth in women with length greater than 20 mm or volume greater than 2.5 cm was significantly higher than that in women with length between 15 and 19 mm (15.6 vs. 3.9%, P=0.02) or women with volume between 2.0 and 2.4 cm (5.8 vs. 1.6%, P=0.04). A linear inverse correlation (r=-0.3, P<0.001) between gestational age at birth and length, but not volume (r=0.0, P=0.9) or transverse diameter (r=0.2, P<0.0001), emerged. The mode of delivery was not affected by cone characteristics. Length, but not transverse diameter and volume, of the excised specimen seems to be related to a lower gestational age at birth. When excisions are performed under strict colposcopic guidance, with a correct modulation of cone length, the risk for preterm birth and cesarean delivery in subsequent pregnancies is not increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26317385     DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  10 in total

1.  The role of endocervical curettage in detection and treatment of cervical canal lesions.

Authors:  Lin Lang; Ying Jia; Zhaoning Duan; Jin Wu; Ming Luo; Pu Tian
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 2.  Innovative Diagnostic and Therapeutic Interventions in Cervical Dysplasia: A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Julia M Hecken; Günther A Rezniczek; Clemens B Tempfer
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  The Appropriate of Cone Depth in Loop Electrical Excision Procedure (LEEP) for Negative Pathological Margin from High Grade Precancerous Lesion of Cervix, Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Noppames Srijarusith; Nopporn Rodpenpear
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2022-02-01

4.  Study on the correlation between hTREC and HPV load and cervical CINI/II/III lesions and cervical cancer.

Authors:  Haizhen He; Qionghui Pan; Jiajia Pan; Yumei Chen; Liqin Cao
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  Long-term observational approach in women with histological diagnosis of cervical low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: an Italian multicentric retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Andrea Ciavattini; Matteo Serri; Jacopo Di Giuseppe; Carlo Antonio Liverani; Barbara Gardella; Maria Papiccio; Giovanni Delli Carpini; Stefano Morini; Nicolò Clemente; Francesco Sopracordevole
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure and Cone Conundrum: The Role of Cumulative Excised Depth in Predicting Preterm Birth.

Authors:  Danielle M Panelli; Rachel L Wood; Kevin M Elias; Whitfield B Growdon; Anjali J Kaimal; Sarah Feldman; Thomas F McElrath
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2022-02-04

7.  Incisal margin condition after LEEP for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia patients and prognosis.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Xiufeang Liu; Lina Xu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Effect of age and cone dimensions on cervical regeneration: an Italian multicentric prospective observational study.

Authors:  Andrea Ciavattini; Giovanni Delli Carpini; Lorenzo Moriconi; Nicolò Clemente; Nina Montik; Rosa De Vincenzo; Anna Del Fabro; Monica Buttignol; Caterina Ricci; Francesca Moro; Francesco Sopracordevole
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Influence of training level on cervical cone size and resection margin status at conization: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Eliana Montanari; Christoph Grimm; Richard Schwameis; Lorenz Kuessel; Stephan Polterauer; Chiara Paternostro; Heinrich Husslein
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 2.344

10.  Evaluation of cervical length and optimal timing for pregnancy after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Xiao Zhang; Jinfei Tong; Xudong Ma; Hailan Yu; Xiaojing Guan; Jianqiong Li; Jianhua Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.