| Literature DB >> 26316963 |
Eleanor Fleming1, Jared Oremo2, Katherine O'Connor3, Aloyce Odhiambo2, Tun Ye4, Simon Oswago5, Clement Zeh5, Robert Quick6, Mary L Kamb7.
Abstract
We evaluated the integration of rapid syphilis tests (RSTs) and penicillin treatment kits into routine antenatal clinic (ANC) services in two rural districts in Nyanza Province, Kenya. In February 2011, nurses from 25 clinics were trained in using RSTs and documenting test results and treatment. During March 2011-February 2012, free RSTs and treatment kits were provided to clinics for use during ANC visits. We analyzed ANC registry data from eight clinics during the 12-month periods before and during RST program implementation and compared syphilis testing, diagnosis, and treatment during the two periods. Syphilis testing at first ANC visit increased from 18% (279 of 1,586 attendees) before the intervention to 70% (1,123 of 1,614 attendees) during the intervention (P < 0.001); 35 women (3%) tested positive during the intervention period compared with 1 (<1%) before (P < 0.001). Syphilis treatment was not recorded according to training recommendations; seven clinics identified 28 RST-positive women and recorded 34 treatment kits as used. Individual-level data from three high-volume clinics supported that the intervention did not negatively affect HIV test uptake. Integrating RSTs into rural ANC services increased syphilis testing and detection. Record keeping on treatment of syphilis in RST-positive women remains challenging.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 26316963 PMCID: PMC4437431 DOI: 10.1155/2013/674584
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Sex Transm Dis ISSN: 2090-7958
Antenatal syphilis and HIV testing coverage and seropositivity rates at eight priority clinics, 12 months before and 12 months during implementation of a rapid syphilis testing intervention, Suba and Mbita Districts, Kenya, March 2010–February 2012.
| Clinic type | Before intervention | During intervention | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # at 1st ANC | # (%) Tested for syphilis | # (%) Tested for positive syphilis | # (%) Tested for HIV | # (%) Tested positive for HIV | # at 1st ANC | # (%) Tested for syphilis | # (%) Tested for positive syphilis | # (%) Tested for HIV | # (%) Tested positive for HIV | Change in syphilis testing | Change in HIV testing ( | |
| Dispensary | ||||||||||||
| Facility 1 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 33 (97) | 15 (46) | 70 | 66 (94) | 7 (11) | 58 (83)∗ | 24 (41) | <0.001 | 0.04 |
| Facility 2 | 162 | 0 | 0 | 153 (94) | 28 (18) | 171 | 132 (77) | 6 (5)∗∗ | 162 (95) | 22 (14) | <0.001 | 0.45 |
| Facility 3 | 157 | 0 | 0 | 151 (96) | 22 (15) | 122 | 90 (74) | 2 (2) | 92 (75)∗ | 9 (7) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
| Health center | ||||||||||||
| Facility 4 | 351 | 104 (30) | 0 | 307 (88) | 40 (13) | 345 | 161 (47) | 7 (4) | 300 (87) | 34 (11) | <0.001 | 0.84 |
| Facility 5 | 114 | 3 (7) | 0 | 97 (85) | 11 (11) | 144 | 115 (80) | 3 (3) | 126 (88) | 10 (8) | <0.001 | 0.57 |
| Facility 6 | 178 | 1 (1) | 0 | 165 (93) | 26 (16) | 216 | 166 (77) | 6 (4) | 174 (81)∗ | 12 (7) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Facility 7 | 297 | 98 (33) | 1 (1) | 239 (81) | 35 (15) | 255 | 206 (81) | 3 (2) | 159 (62)∗ | 38 (13) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
| Subdistrict hospital | ||||||||||||
| Facility 8 | 293 | 73 (25) | 0 | 241 (82) | 34 (14) | 291 | 187 (64) | 1 (1) | 221 (76)∗ | 23 (10) | <0.001 | 0.03 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Total | 1586 | 279 (18) | 1 (<1) | 1386 (87) | 211 (25) | 1614 | 1123 (70) | 35 (3) | 1292 (72) | 172 (15) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
1Dispensaries: lowest level of health system, typically have one nurse and provide simple ambulatory and preventive services.
2Health centres: lower-level facilities that are larger than dispensaries, under a clinical officer and with basic health staff (e.g., two or more nurses, a pharmacist), and provide ambulatory and preventive health services (e.g., vaccines).
3Subdistrict hospital: similar to health centre but has basic laboratory services (although not RPR testing).
∗Facilities reporting HIV test stock outs from February 29–April 2012.
∗∗Facility reporting syphilis test kit stock outs for the following dates: June 7–9, 2011, September 7, 2011, and October 11-12, 2011, due to problems with distribution.
Percentage of pregnant women tested for HIV, syphilis, or both, by clinic and gestational age, among consecutive women attending first antenatal care visit in three high-volume clinics, Suba and Mbita Districts, Kenya, from March 2011 to February 2012.
| HIV test only | Syphilis test only | Both tests | Neither test | Any HIV test | Any syphilis test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Women at 1st ANC visit ( | 66 (20.0) | 29 (8.8) | 222 (67.3) | 13 (3.9) | 288 (87.3) | 251 (76.1) |
| Clinic | ||||||
| Facility 4 ( | 20 (20.0) | 3 (3.0) | 77 (77.0) | 0 | 97 (97.0) | 80 (80.0) |
| Facility 7 ( | 6 (5.0) | 10 (8.3) | 100 (83.3) | 4 (3.3) | 106 (88.3) | 110 (91.7%) |
| Facility 8 ( | 40 (36.4) | 16 (14.6) | 45 (40.9) | 9 (8.2) | 85 (77.3) | 61 (55.5) |
| Gestational age at 1st ANC∗ | ||||||
| ≤12 weeks ( | 4 (25.0) | 3 (18.8) | 9 (56.3) | 0 | 13 (81.3) | 12 (75.0) |
| 13–24 weeks ( | 21 (16.2) | 9 (6.9) | 95 (73.1) | 5 (3.9) | 116 (89.2) | 104 (80.0) |
| weeks ( | 37 (22.7) | 15 (9.2) | 108 (66.3) | 3 (1.8%) | 145 (89.0) | 123 (75.5) |
*21 records had missing information.
Figure 1Percentage of pregnant women receiving syphilis and HIV tests at first ANC visit in three high-volume, rural health facilities Facilities evaluated included two health centres (facilities 4 and 7) and one subdistrict hospital (facility 8). 12 months before and 12 months during implementation of a rapid syphilis testing intervention.