Literature DB >> 26316655

Conclusions Regarding Cross-Group Differences in Happiness Depend on Difficulty of Reaching Respondents.

Ori Heffetz1, Matthew Rabin2.   

Abstract

A growing literature explores differences in subjective well-being across demographic groups, often relying on surveys with high nonresponse rates. By using the reported number of call attempts made to participants in the University of Michigan's Surveys of Consumers, we show that comparisons among easy-to-reach respondents differ from comparisons among hard-to-reach ones. Notably, easy-to-reach women are happier than easy-to-reach men, but hard-to-reach men are happier than hard-to-reach women, and conclusions of a survey could reverse with more attempted calls. Better alternatives to comparing group sample averages might include putting greater weight on hard-to-reach respondents or even extrapolating trends in responses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  happiness; nonresponse bias; selection bias; surveys

Year:  2013        PMID: 26316655      PMCID: PMC4548978          DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.7.3001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Econ Rev        ISSN: 0002-8282


  5 in total

1.  The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment.

Authors:  R Curtin; S Presser; E Singer
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

2.  Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey.

Authors:  S Keeter; C Miller; A Kohut; R M Groves; S Presser
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

3.  High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being.

Authors:  Daniel Kahneman; Angus Deaton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States.

Authors:  Arthur A Stone; Joseph E Schwartz; Joan E Broderick; Angus Deaton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  How social processes distort measurement: the impact of survey nonresponse on estimates of volunteer work in the United States.

Authors:  Katharine G Abraham; Stanley Presser; Sara Helms
Journal:  AJS       Date:  2009-01
  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Self-reported wellbeing indicators are a valuable complement to traditional economic indicators but are not yet ready to compete with them.

Authors:  Dan Benjamin; Kristen Cooper; Ori Heffetz; Miles Kimball
Journal:  Behav Public Policy       Date:  2020-01-23

2.  Beyond Happiness and Satisfaction: Toward Well-Being Indices Based on Stated Preference.

Authors:  Daniel J Benjamin; Miles S Kimball; Ori Heffetz; Nichole Szembrot
Journal:  Am Econ Rev       Date:  2014-09

3.  Well-Being on Prince Edward Island, Canada: a Statistical Case-Study of Well-Being Related Community Factors.

Authors:  Connolly Aziz; Tim Lomas; Scarlette Mattoli
Journal:  Int J Community Wellbeing       Date:  2022-06-15

4.  Evaluative and hedonic wellbeing among those with and without children at home.

Authors:  Angus Deaton; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The Asymmetric Experience of Positive and Negative Economic Growth: Global Evidence Using Subjective Well-Being Data.

Authors:  Jan-Emmanuel De Neve; George Ward; Femke De Keulenaer; Bert Van Landeghem; Georgios Kavetsos; Michael I Norton
Journal:  Rev Econ Stat       Date:  2018-05-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.