D Cannizzaro1, W Brinjikji2, S Rammos3, M H Murad4, G Lanzino1. 1. From the Departments of Neurosurgery (D.C., G.L.). 2. Radiology (W.B.) brinjikji.waleed@mayo.edu. 3. Department of Neurosurgery (S.R.), Arkansas Neuroscience Institute, Little Rock, Arkansas. 4. Center for Science of Healthcare Delivery (M.H.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas are characterized by a high hemorrhagic risk. We evaluated trends in outcomes and management of tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas and performed a meta-analysis evaluating clinical and angiographic outcomes by treatment technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search for studies on surgical and endovascular treatment of tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas. We compared the proportion of patients undergoing endovascular, surgical, and combined endovascular/surgical management; the proportion of patients presenting with ruptured tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas; and proportion of patients with good neurologic outcome across 3 time periods: 1980-1995, 1996-2005, and 2006-2014. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis, evaluating the rates of occlusion, long-term good neurologic outcome, perioperative morbidity, and resolution of symptoms for the 3 treatment modalities. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies with 274 patients were included. The proportion of patients treated with surgical treatment alone decreased from 38.7% to 20.4% between 1980-1995 and 2006-2014. The proportion of patients treated with endovascular therapy alone increased from 16.1% to 48.0%. The proportion of patients presenting with ruptured tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas decreased from 64.4% to 43.6%. The rate of good neurologic outcome increased from 80.7% to 92.9%. Complete occlusion rates were highest for patients receiving multimodality treatment (84.0%; 95% CI, 72.0%-91.0%) and lowest for endovascular treatment (71.0%; 95% CI, 56.0%-83.0%; P < .01). Long-term good neurologic outcome was highest in the endovascular group (89.0%; 95% CI, 80.0%-95.0%) and lowest for the surgical group (73.0%; 95% CI, 51.0%-87.0%; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas are increasingly presenting with unruptured lesions, being treated endovascularly, and experiencing higher rates of good neurologic outcomes. Endovascular treatment was associated with superior neurologic outcomes but lower occlusion rates.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas are characterized by a high hemorrhagic risk. We evaluated trends in outcomes and management of tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas and performed a meta-analysis evaluating clinical and angiographic outcomes by treatment technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search for studies on surgical and endovascular treatment of tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas. We compared the proportion of patients undergoing endovascular, surgical, and combined endovascular/surgical management; the proportion of patients presenting with ruptured tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas; and proportion of patients with good neurologic outcome across 3 time periods: 1980-1995, 1996-2005, and 2006-2014. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis, evaluating the rates of occlusion, long-term good neurologic outcome, perioperative morbidity, and resolution of symptoms for the 3 treatment modalities. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies with 274 patients were included. The proportion of patients treated with surgical treatment alone decreased from 38.7% to 20.4% between 1980-1995 and 2006-2014. The proportion of patients treated with endovascular therapy alone increased from 16.1% to 48.0%. The proportion of patients presenting with ruptured tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas decreased from 64.4% to 43.6%. The rate of good neurologic outcome increased from 80.7% to 92.9%. Complete occlusion rates were highest for patients receiving multimodality treatment (84.0%; 95% CI, 72.0%-91.0%) and lowest for endovascular treatment (71.0%; 95% CI, 56.0%-83.0%; P < .01). Long-term good neurologic outcome was highest in the endovascular group (89.0%; 95% CI, 80.0%-95.0%) and lowest for the surgical group (73.0%; 95% CI, 51.0%-87.0%; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas are increasingly presenting with unruptured lesions, being treated endovascularly, and experiencing higher rates of good neurologic outcomes. Endovascular treatment was associated with superior neurologic outcomes but lower occlusion rates.
Authors: Huai-Che Yang; Hideyuki Kano; Douglas Kondziolka; Ajay Niranjan; John C Flickinger; Michael B Horowitz; L Dade Lunsford Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Anna Piippo; Mika Niemelä; Jouke van Popta; Marko Kangasniemi; Jaakko Rinne; Juha E Jääskeläinen; Juha Hernesniemi Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Patrick R Tomak; Harry J Cloft; Akihiko Kaga; C Michael Cawley; Jacques Dion; Daniel L Barrow Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Mohammed A Azab; Emma R Dioso; Matthew C Findlay; Jayson Nelson; Cameron A Rawanduzy; Philip Johansen; Brandon Lucke-Wold Journal: J Rare Dis Orphan Drugs Date: 2022-06-07
Authors: D Cannizzaro; S Peschillo; M Cenzato; G Pero; M C Resta; G Guidetti; N Burdi; M Piccirilli; A Santoro; G Lanzino Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 3.042