Literature DB >> 26316395

Comparison of the treatment outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with parapharyngeal space extension.

Ling-Long Tang1, Lei Chen1, Yan-Ping Mao1, Wen-Fei Li1, Ying Sun1, Li-Zhi Liu2, Ai-Hua Lin3, Hai-Qiang Mai4, Jian-Yong Shao5, Li Li2, Jun Ma6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: This study investigated the contribution of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to improved treatment outcome in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and parapharyngeal space (PPS) extension.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 1052 cases with PPS extension were retrospectively reviewed, including 512 (48.7%) patients treated with two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-CRT) and 540 (51.3%) patients treated with IMRT.
RESULTS: Significant differences in local relapse-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) (P<0.001, P<0.001, respectively), but not distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS; P=0.383), were observed between the 2D-CRT and IMRT groups in univariate analysis. The radiotherapy technique was found to be an independent prognostic factor for death (HR=0.674, 95% CI: 0.537-0.846, P=0.001) and local recurrence (HR=0.486, 95% CI: 0.324-0.727, P<0.001), but not for DMFS. IMRT improved local control in patients with carotid space (CS) involvement compared to 2D-CRT (P<0.001). LRFS was significantly different between patients with and without CS extension in the 2D-CRT group (P<0.001), but not in the IMRT group (P=0.215).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to 2D-CRT, IMRT improved LRFS in patients with PPS extension, especially patients with CS extension, but did not improve DMFS. CS extension was not statistically prognostic for local control in NPC patients with PPS extension.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Parapharyngeal space; Prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26316395     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  5 in total

1.  Stage-specific concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without induction chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective, population-based study.

Authors:  Wei-Xiong Xia; Hu Liang; Xing Lv; Lin Wang; Yan-Fang Ye; Liang-Ru Ke; Lin-Hao Xu; Xiang Guo; Yan-Qun Xiang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.989

2.  Validation of the 8th edition of the UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Min Kang; Pingting Zhou; Guisheng Li; Haolin Yan; Guosheng Feng; Meilian Liu; Jinxian Zhu; Rensheng Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-02

3.  A knowledge-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning technique for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy.

Authors:  Penggang Bai; Xing Weng; Kerun Quan; Jihong Chen; Yitao Dai; Yuanji Xu; Fasheng Lin; Jing Zhong; Tianming Wu; Chuanben Chen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Low Skeletal Muscle Mass Impairs Quality of Life in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Xin Hua; Jun-Fang Liao; Shan Liu; Jun Zhang; Han-Ying Huang; Wen Wen; Zhi-Qing Long; Wen-Wen Zhang; Ling Guo; Huan-Xin Lin
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2020-01-15

5.  Staging of T2 and T3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Proposed modifications for improving the current AJCC staging system.

Authors:  Chunyan Cui; Haojiang Li; Huali Ma; Annan Dong; Fei Xie; Shaobo Liang; Li Li; Jian Zhou; Chuanbo Xie; Yue Yan; Lizhi Liu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.