Literature DB >> 26316372

External Validation of CROES Nephrolithometry as a Preoperative Predictive System for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes.

Stavros Sfoungaristos1, Ofer N Gofrit2, Vladimir Yutkin2, Ezekiel H Landau2, Dov Pode2, Mordechai Duvdevani2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We externally validated CROES (Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society) nephrolithometry and evaluated the predictive accuracy of the nomogram.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected on patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy between January 2012 and February 2015. The CROES nomogram was applied to all patients and externally validated. The AUC and calibration plot were used for discrimination and clinical validity assessment.
RESULTS: A total of 176 patients were included in study. Mean ± SD patient age was 55.2 ± 13.9 years and the mean stone burden was 640.0 ± 911.4 mm(2). The CROES nomogram was significantly associated with stone number, location and burden, and the number of implicated calyces, punctures and tracts. The postoperative treatment success rate was 85.8%. The number of stones, number of implicated calyces and CROES score were independent predictors of treatment success. The estimated AUC was 0.715 and the model provided good calibration.
CONCLUSIONS: The CROES nomogram is an accurate tool to estimate renal stone complexity. CROES nephrolithometry provides great accuracy to predict postoperative efficacy.
Copyright © 2016 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calculi; kidney; nephrostomy, percutaneous; nomograms; prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26316372     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Do the urolithiasis scoring systems predict the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in cases with anatomical abnormalities?

Authors:  Ramazan Kocaaslan; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Ibrahim Buldu; Muhammed Tosun; Mehmet Mazhar Utangac; Tolga Karakan; Ekrem Ozyuvali; Namik Kemal Hatipoglu; Ali Unsal; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Comparison of STONE, CROES and Guy's nephrolithometry scoring systems for predicting stone-free status and complication rates after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Faruk Ozgor; Fatih Yanaral; Metin Savun; Harun Ozdemir; Omer Sarilar; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Current clinical scoring systems of percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes.

Authors:  Wayland J Wu; Zeph Okeke
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Comparison of CROES, S.T.O.N.E, and Guy's scoring systems for the prediction of stone-free status and complication rates following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Fatih Yanaral; Faruk Ozgor; Metin Savun; Murat Sahan; Omer Sarilar; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  What is the quickest scoring system to predict percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes? A comparative study among S.T.O.N.E score, guy's stone score and croes nomogram.

Authors:  Fabio C Vicentini; Felipe R Serzedello; Kay Thomas; Giovanni S Marchini; Fabio C M Torricelli; Miguel Srougi; Eduardo Mazzucchi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  Comparison of Scoring Systems in Predicting Success of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Authors:  Muzaffer Akçay; Muhammed Tosun; Fatih Gevher; Senad Kalkan; Cevper Ersöz; Yunus Kayalı; Abdulkadir Tepeler
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.021

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.