Literature DB >> 26316275

Concurrent and Predictive Validity of Composite Methods to Assess Nutritional Status in Older Adults on Hemodialysis.

Fernanda Galvão de Oliveira Santin1, Fernanda Guedes Bigogno1, Juliana Cordeiro Dias Rodrigues1, Lilian Cuppari2, Carla Maria Avesani3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of subjective global assessment (SGA), malnutrition inflammation score (MIS), and mini nutritional assessment short-form (MNA-SF) in older adults on hemodialysis (HD) by evaluating their concurrent and predictive validity.
DESIGN: An observational and prospective study including older adults on HD.
SETTING: Six dialysis units.
SUBJECTS: We assessed 137 HD patients aged ≥60 years (71.7% male, 70.2 ± 7.2 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The nutritional status was assessed by 7-point SGA, MIS and MNA-SF, and by objective methods. Patients were followed up for 14.5 (8; 26.3) months (median and interquartile) to assess survival.
RESULTS: Protein energy wasting (PEW) was present in 63% of the patients when assessed by SGA, in 77% by MIS, and in 26% by MNA-SF. Most objective parameters of patients classified with PEW were lower (P < .05) than those from patients classified as well-nourished by SGA, MIS, and MNA-SF. In addition, the hazard of death was higher for patients classified as PEW by SGA (hazard ratio 2.63 [95% confidence interval 1.14-6.00]), MIS (5.13 [1.19-13.7]), and MNA-SF (2.53 [1.34-4.77]) in comparison to well-nourished patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of PEW varied depending on the tool applied. SGA, MIS, and MNA-SF had good concurrent and predictive validity for the assessment of nutritional status, but SGA and MIS were likely to perform better than MNA-SF.
Copyright © 2016 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26316275     DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2015.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ren Nutr        ISSN: 1051-2276            Impact factor:   3.655


  7 in total

1.  The predictive value of malnutrition for functional and cognitive status in elderly hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Irina Mihaela Abdulan; Mihai Onofriescu; Ramona Stefaniu; Alexandra Mastaleru; Veronica Mocanu; Ioana-Dana Alexa; Adrian Covic
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Subjective Global Assessment-Dialysis Malnutrition Score and cardiovascular risk in hemodialysis patients: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Leonardo Spatola; Silvia Finazzi; Albania Calvetta; Francesco Reggiani; Emanuela Morenghi; Silvia Santostasi; Claudio Angelini; Salvatore Badalamenti; Giacomo Mugnai
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 3.902

3.  Comparison of Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis (BIVA) to 7-point Subjective Global Assessment for the diagnosis of malnutrition.

Authors:  Clara S A Sugizaki; Nayara P Queiroz; Débora M Silva; Ana T V S Freitas; Nara A Costa; Maria R G Peixoto
Journal:  J Bras Nefrol       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun

4.  Evaluation of nutritional status using anthropometric measurements and MQSGA in geriatric hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Irem Pembegul Yigit; Ramazan Ulu; Huseyin Celiker; Ayhan Dogukan
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2016-11-26

5.  The screening score of Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) is a useful routine screening tool for malnutrition risk in patients on maintenance dialysis.

Authors:  Els Holvoet; Karsten Vanden Wyngaert; Amaryllis H Van Craenenbroeck; Wim Van Biesen; Sunny Eloot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Agreement Between Two Nutritional Assessment Scores as Markers of Malnutrition in Patients with End-stage Renal Disease.

Authors:  Abdul Rehman Arshad; Shanzay Jamal; Khadija Amanullah
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-03-26

7.  Clinical global assessment of nutritional status as predictor of mortality in chronic kidney disease patients.

Authors:  Lu Dai; Hideyuki Mukai; Bengt Lindholm; Olof Heimbürger; Peter Barany; Peter Stenvinkel; Abdul Rashid Qureshi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.