Literature DB >> 26316190

Multi-Layer and Recursive Neural Networks for Metagenomic Classification.

Gregory Ditzler, Robi Polikar, Gail Rosen.   

Abstract

Recent advances in machine learning, specifically in deep learning with neural networks, has made a profound impact on fields such as natural language processing, image classification, and language modeling; however, feasibility and potential benefits of the approaches to metagenomic data analysis has been largely under-explored. Deep learning exploits many layers of learning nonlinear feature representations, typically in an unsupervised fashion, and recent results have shown outstanding generalization performance on previously unseen data. Furthermore, some deep learning methods can also represent the structure in a data set. Consequently, deep learning and neural networks may prove to be an appropriate approach for metagenomic data. To determine whether such approaches are indeed appropriate for metagenomics, we experiment with two deep learning methods: i) a deep belief network, and ii) a recursive neural network, the latter of which provides a tree representing the structure of the data. We compare these approaches to the standard multi-layer perceptron, which has been well-established in the machine learning community as a powerful prediction algorithm, though its presence is largely missing in metagenomics literature. We find that traditional neural networks can be quite powerful classifiers on metagenomic data compared to baseline methods, such as random forests. On the other hand, while the deep learning approaches did not result in improvements to the classification accuracy, they do provide the ability to learn hierarchical representations of a data set that standard classification methods do not allow. Our goal in this effort is not to determine the best algorithm in terms accuracy-as that depends on the specific application-but rather to highlight the benefits and drawbacks of each of the approach we discuss and provide insight on how they can be improved for predictive metagenomic analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26316190     DOI: 10.1109/TNB.2015.2461219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Nanobioscience        ISSN: 1536-1241            Impact factor:   2.935


  18 in total

Review 1.  A Survey of Data Mining and Deep Learning in Bioinformatics.

Authors:  Kun Lan; Dan-Tong Wang; Simon Fong; Lian-Sheng Liu; Kelvin K L Wong; Nilanjan Dey
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  MetaPheno: A critical evaluation of deep learning and machine learning in metagenome-based disease prediction.

Authors:  Nathan LaPierre; Chelsea J-T Ju; Guangyu Zhou; Wei Wang
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Metrics for Performance Evaluation of Patient Exercises during Physical Therapy.

Authors:  Aleksandar Vakanski; Jake M Ferguson; Stephen Lee
Journal:  Int J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-04-20

4.  Inflammatory bowel disease biomarkers of human gut microbiota selected via different feature selection methods.

Authors:  Burcu Bakir-Gungor; Hilal Hacılar; Amhar Jabeer; Ozkan Ufuk Nalbantoglu; Oya Aran; Malik Yousef
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.061

5.  Gene Prediction in Metagenomic Fragments with Deep Learning.

Authors:  Shao-Wu Zhang; Xiang-Yang Jin; Teng Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  MetaLonDA: a flexible R package for identifying time intervals of differentially abundant features in metagenomic longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Ahmed A Metwally; Jie Yang; Christian Ascoli; Yang Dai; Patricia W Finn; David L Perkins
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 14.650

7.  Phylogenetic convolutional neural networks in metagenomics.

Authors:  Diego Fioravanti; Ylenia Giarratano; Valerio Maggio; Claudio Agostinelli; Marco Chierici; Giuseppe Jurman; Cesare Furlanello
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine.

Authors:  Travers Ching; Daniel S Himmelstein; Brett K Beaulieu-Jones; Alexandr A Kalinin; Brian T Do; Gregory P Way; Enrico Ferrero; Paul-Michael Agapow; Michael Zietz; Michael M Hoffman; Wei Xie; Gail L Rosen; Benjamin J Lengerich; Johnny Israeli; Jack Lanchantin; Stephen Woloszynek; Anne E Carpenter; Avanti Shrikumar; Jinbo Xu; Evan M Cofer; Christopher A Lavender; Srinivas C Turaga; Amr M Alexandari; Zhiyong Lu; David J Harris; Dave DeCaprio; Yanjun Qi; Anshul Kundaje; Yifan Peng; Laura K Wiley; Marwin H S Segler; Simina M Boca; S Joshua Swamidass; Austin Huang; Anthony Gitter; Casey S Greene
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.293

9.  Scalable metagenomics alignment research tool (SMART): a scalable, rapid, and complete search heuristic for the classification of metagenomic sequences from complex sequence populations.

Authors:  Aaron Y Lee; Cecilia S Lee; Russell N Van Gelder
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  ECG data compression using a neural network model based on multi-objective optimization.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Jiasheng Zhao; Xiao Chen; Jianhuang Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.