| Literature DB >> 26316133 |
Mette Berendt1, Robyn G Farquhar2, Paul J J Mandigers3, Akos Pakozdy4, Sofie F M Bhatti5, Luisa De Risio6, Andrea Fischer7, Sam Long8, Kaspar Matiasek9, Karen Muñana10, Edward E Patterson11, Jacques Penderis12, Simon Platt13, Michael Podell14, Heidrun Potschka15, Martí Batlle Pumarola16, Clare Rusbridge17,18, Veronika M Stein19, Andrea Tipold20, Holger A Volk21.
Abstract
Dogs with epilepsy are among the commonest neurological patients in veterinary practice and therefore have historically attracted much attention with regard to definitions, clinical approach and management. A number of classification proposals for canine epilepsy have been published during the years reflecting always in parts the current proposals coming from the human epilepsy organisation the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE). It has however not been possible to gain agreed consensus, "a common language", for the classification and terminology used between veterinary and human neurologists and neuroscientists, practitioners, neuropharmacologists and neuropathologists. This has led to an unfortunate situation where different veterinary publications and textbook chapters on epilepsy merely reflect individual author preferences with respect to terminology, which can be confusing to the readers and influence the definition and diagnosis of epilepsy in first line practice and research studies.In this document the International Veterinary Epilepsy Task Force (IVETF) discusses current understanding of canine epilepsy and presents our 2015 proposal for terminology and classification of epilepsy and epileptic seizures. We propose a classification system which reflects new thoughts from the human ILAE but also roots in former well accepted terminology. We think that this classification system can be used by all stakeholders.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26316133 PMCID: PMC4552272 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-015-0461-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Veterinary terminology and its most common amendments over time
| Early terminology | Terminology currently in use | Suggested veterinary terminology 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|
| Petit Mal | Partial/focal seizure | Focal epileptic seizurea |
| Aura | - Simple partial/focal seizure (consciousness unimpaireda) | ||
| -Will present with focal motor, autonomic or behavioural signs alone or in combination | |||
| - Complex partial/focal seizure (consciousness impaireda) | |||
|
| Grand Mal (always implicating convulsions) | Primary generalized seizure | Generalized epileptic seizure |
|
| Partial seizure with secondary generalization (secondary generalized seizure) | Focal seizure with secondary generalization | Focal epileptic seizure evolving to become generalized |
|
| |||
| Epilepsy classified by aetiology | Primary Epilepsy | Idiopathic Epilepsy | Idiopathic Epilepsy |
| - Epilepsy where no structural cerebral pathology is suspected | - Epilepsy where no structural cerebral pathology is suspected. A genetic component may be involved | 1. Proven genetic background | |
| 2. Suspected genetic background | |||
| 3. Unknown cause and no indication of structural epilepsy | |||
| Epilepsy classified by aetiology | Secondary or Acquired epilepsy | Symptomatic Epilepsy | Structural epilepsy |
| - Epilepsy caused by identified cerebral pathology | - Epilepsy caused by identified cerebral pathology | - Epilepsy caused by identified cerebral pathology | |
| Epilepsy classified by aetiology | Cryptogenic | Probably or possibly symptomatic epilepsy | Unknown cause |
| - Meaning hidden | - A suspected symptomatic cause, which however remains obscure |
aRegarding our ability to evaluate if consciousness is unimpaired or impaired during focal seizures (former termed simple and complex focal seizures). We recommend that it is not attempted to interpret signs occurring during focal seizures where dogs may appear e.g. confused, unable to recognize the owner or not responding to commands as impaired consciousness, as this cannot objectively be investigated in animals
Development of ILAE classifications
| ILAE 1981 and 1989 | ILAE 2010 | Berg and Scheffer 2011 [ |
|---|---|---|
| Generalized seizures are those in which the first clinical and electroencephalographic changes indicate initial involvement of both cerebral hemispheres. | Generalized seizures are conceptualized as originating at some point within and rapidly engaging bilaterally distributed networks. Such bilateral networks can include cortical and subcortical structures, but do not necessarily include the entire cortex. Generalized seizures can be asymmetric. | |
| Focal seizures (previously defined as partial) are those in which the first clinical and electroencephalographic changes indicate initial activation of a system of neurons limited to a part of one cerebral hemisphere. | Focal seizures are conceptualized as originating at some point within networks limited to one hemisphere. They may be discretely localized or more widely distributed. Focal seizures may originate in subcortical structures. For each seizure type, ictal onset is consistent from one seizure to another, with preferential propagation patterns that can involve the contralateral hemisphere. The Glossary of Ictal Semiology [ | |
| Idiopathic epilepsy: there is no underlying cause other than a possible hereditary predisposition. | Genetic epilepsy: the epilepsy is, as best as understood, the direct result of a known or presumed genetic defect(s) in which seizures are the core symptom of the disorder. This attribution must be supported by specific forms of evidence (e.g. specific molecular genetic studies or family studies). | Genetic: The epilepsy is a direct result of a genetic cause. Ideally, a gene and the mechanisms should be identified; however, this term would also apply to electroclinical syndromes for which twin or family segregation studies reproducibly show clinical evidence of a genetic basis (e.g., in the case of the genetic generalized epilepsies). At this time, channelopathies are the best example of genetic epilepsies. Ultimately, we expect causes of epilepsies to be identified by the mechanisms involved (i.e., channelopathies, mitochondrial respiratory chaindefects, etc.). |
| Symptomatic epilepsy: this type of epilepsy is the consequence of a known or suspected disorder of the central nervous system. | Structural and metabolic epilepsy: this type of epilepsy is the secondary result of a distinct structural or metabolic condition. These structural or metabolic disorders may be of acquired or genetic origin (as is the case for malformations of cortical development and certain metabolic disorders). | Structural-Metabolic: The epilepsy is the secondary result of a separate structural or metabolic condition. Structural and metabolic were combined to separate the concept from genetic and also because the two are often inseparable. Note that structural brain lesions, including many malformations of cortical development, often have genetic causes and most metabolic disorders are also of genetic origin. The distinction between “genetic epilepsy” and epilepsy due to a structural/metabolic cause is far from perfect, but we anticipate more specific characterizations of cause in the upcoming years. |
| Cryptogenic (probable symptomatic) epilepsy: this refers to a disorder whose cause is hidden or occult. Cryptogenic epilepsies are presumed to be symptomatic. | Unknown epilepsy: the nature of the underlying cause is as yet unknown; it may have a fundamental genetic basis (e.g., a previously unrecognized channelopathy) or it may be the consequence of an unrecognized structural or metabolic disorder not yet identified. | Unknown: Plain and direct, this label simply and accurately indicates ignorance and that further investigation is needed to identify the cause of the epilepsy. Unlike cryptogenic (presumed symptomatic), it makes no presumptions and requires no explanation or reinterpretation. |