OBJECTIVE: Lower limb amputees are at high risk of falling as current prosthetic legs provide only limited functionality for recovering balance after unexpected disturbances. For instance, the most established control method used on powered leg prostheses tracks local joint impedance functions without taking the global function of the leg in balance recovery into account. Here, we explore an alternative control policy for powered transfemoral prostheses that considers the global leg function and is based on a neuromuscular model of human locomotion. METHODS: We adapt this model to describe and simulate an amputee walking with a powered prosthesis using the proposed control, and evaluate the gait robustness when confronted with rough ground and swing leg disturbances. We then implement and partially evaluate the resulting controller on a leg prosthesis prototype worn by a nonamputee user. RESULTS: In simulation, the proposed prosthesis control leads to gaits that are more robust than those obtained by the impedance control method. The initial hardware experiments with the prosthesis prototype show that the proposed control reproduces normal walking patterns qualitatively and effectively responds to disturbances in early and late swing. However, the response to midswing disturbances neither replicates human responses nor averts falls. CONCLUSIONS: The neuromuscular model control is a promising alternative to existing prosthesis controls, although further research will need to improve on the initial implementation and determine how well these results transfer to amputee gait. SIGNIFICANCE: This paper provides a potential avenue for future development of control policies that help to improve amputee balance recovery.
OBJECTIVE: Lower limb amputees are at high risk of falling as current prosthetic legs provide only limited functionality for recovering balance after unexpected disturbances. For instance, the most established control method used on powered leg prostheses tracks local joint impedance functions without taking the global function of the leg in balance recovery into account. Here, we explore an alternative control policy for powered transfemoral prostheses that considers the global leg function and is based on a neuromuscular model of human locomotion. METHODS: We adapt this model to describe and simulate an amputee walking with a powered prosthesis using the proposed control, and evaluate the gait robustness when confronted with rough ground and swing leg disturbances. We then implement and partially evaluate the resulting controller on a leg prosthesis prototype worn by a nonamputee user. RESULTS: In simulation, the proposed prosthesis control leads to gaits that are more robust than those obtained by the impedance control method. The initial hardware experiments with the prosthesis prototype show that the proposed control reproduces normal walking patterns qualitatively and effectively responds to disturbances in early and late swing. However, the response to midswing disturbances neither replicates human responses nor averts falls. CONCLUSIONS: The neuromuscular model control is a promising alternative to existing prosthesis controls, although further research will need to improve on the initial implementation and determine how well these results transfer to amputee gait. SIGNIFICANCE: This paper provides a potential avenue for future development of control policies that help to improve amputee balance recovery.
Authors: Frank Sup; Huseyin Atakan Varol; Jason Mitchell; Thomas J Withrow; Michael Goldfarb Journal: IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron Date: 2009 Impact factor: 5.303
Authors: David Quintero; Dario J Villarreal; Daniel J Lambert; Susan Kapp; Robert D Gregg Journal: IEEE Trans Robot Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 5.567
Authors: V Monaco; P Tropea; F Aprigliano; D Martelli; A Parri; M Cortese; R Molino-Lova; N Vitiello; S Micera Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Seungmoon Song; Łukasz Kidziński; Xue Bin Peng; Carmichael Ong; Jennifer Hicks; Sergey Levine; Christopher G Atkeson; Scott L Delp Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2021-08-16 Impact factor: 4.262
Authors: Cristina Bayón; Gabriel Delgado-Oleas; Leticia Avellar; Francesca Bentivoglio; Francesco Di Tommaso; Nevio L Tagliamonte; Eduardo Rocon; Edwin H F van Asseldonk Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Cristina Bayón; Arvid Q L Keemink; Michelle van Mierlo; Wolfgang Rampeltshammer; Herman van der Kooij; Edwin H F van Asseldonk Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 4.262
Authors: Amy R Wu; Florin Dzeladini; Tycho J H Brug; Federica Tamburella; Nevio L Tagliamonte; Edwin H F van Asseldonk; Herman van der Kooij; Auke J Ijspeert Journal: Front Neurorobot Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Alejandro F Azocar; Luke M Mooney; Jean-François Duval; Ann M Simon; Levi J Hargrove; Elliott J Rouse Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2020-10-05 Impact factor: 25.671